UCLA takes people with low UG GPAs Forum
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Sat May 08, 2010 10:06 am
UCLA takes people with low UG GPAs
Every time someone with a 3.1/172 asks about chances people invariably say they can't get UCLA because of GPA. Actually people like that do get in because I know two (anecdotal, but I don't know more than a handful of people's scores so take that for what it's worth.) In both cases they have been out for a few years, but that's the only mitigating factor. No great softs, no URM, and straight up admitted, not WL.
Adjust conventional wisdom accordingly.
Adjust conventional wisdom accordingly.
- FuManChusco
- Posts: 1217
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:56 pm
Re: UCLA takes people with low UG GPAs
http://ucla.lawschoolnumbers.com/stats
UCLA is pretty much red and yellow below 3.5. Your friends are an exception not the rule.
UCLA is pretty much red and yellow below 3.5. Your friends are an exception not the rule.
- DoubleChecks
- Posts: 2328
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 4:35 pm
Re: UCLA takes people with low UG GPAs
yes i will call your two friends and raise w/ my hundreds of data points that prove otherwise
lol of course it can still happen, but it is "conventional wisdom" because generally, UCLA isnt very nice towards low GPA applicants relative to other similar schools
lol of course it can still happen, but it is "conventional wisdom" because generally, UCLA isnt very nice towards low GPA applicants relative to other similar schools
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- flyingpanda
- Posts: 824
- Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 5:32 am
Re: UCLA takes people with low UG GPAs
Hey... alts are frowned upon. Reportedthisismynewalt wrote:Every time someone with a 3.1/172 asks about chances people invariably say they can't get UCLA because of GPA. Actually people like that do get in because I know two (anecdotal, but I don't know more than a handful of people's scores so take that for what it's worth.) In both cases they have been out for a few years, but that's the only mitigating factor. No great softs, no URM, and straight up admitted, not WL.
Adjust conventional wisdom accordingly.
Also...anecdotes ftl.
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Sat May 08, 2010 10:06 am
Re: UCLA takes people with low UG GPAs
I posted this because I saw a thread in which a splitter was told not to apply to UCLA because of low GPA. I think it's fair to tell someone not to bother applying to Boalt with a 3.1 and no great softs, especially because I heard Dean Tom actually say that the lowest GPA they accepted out of all applicants for the class of 2011 was a 3.3. But to tell someone not to apply to UCLA because they're a splitter seems over the top and could possibly result in a missed opportunity. It's also possible the Dean Schill started admitting more splitters, since I'm sure one of his top goals for UCLA was T14dom. Last thing anyone would want is for someone not to get into the best school for them because of TLS. I realize you are not the person making this recommendation - I just want to put this out there so that people don't lose out.DoubleChecks wrote:yes i will call your two friends and raise w/ my hundreds of data points that prove otherwise
lol of course it can still happen, but it is "conventional wisdom" because generally, UCLA isnt very nice towards low GPA applicants relative to other similar schools
Edit: said Dean Tom twice, second time meant Schill
Last edited by thisismynewalt on Mon May 10, 2010 1:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- DoubleChecks
- Posts: 2328
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 4:35 pm
Re: UCLA takes people with low UG GPAs
well someone w/ a 3.1/172 who wanted to stay in Cali or go to UCLA i would say yeah throw an app over. it isnt insane or anything. i wouldnt call it a good shot or probable, but possible.thisismynewalt wrote:I posted this because I saw a thread in which a splitter was told not to apply to UCLA because of low GPA. I think it's fair to tell someone not to bother applying to Boalt with a 3.1 and no great softs, especially because I heard Dean Tom actually say that the lowest GPA they accepted out of all applicants for the class of 2011 was a 3.3. But to tell someone not to apply to UCLA because they're a splitter seems over the top and could possibly result in a missed opportunity. It's also possible the Dean Tom started admitting more splitters, since I'm sure one of his top goals for UCLA was T14dom. Last thing anyone would want is for someone not to get into the best school for them because of TLS. I realize you are not the person making this recommendation - I just want to put this out there so that people don't lose out.DoubleChecks wrote:yes i will call your two friends and raise w/ my hundreds of data points that prove otherwise
lol of course it can still happen, but it is "conventional wisdom" because generally, UCLA isnt very nice towards low GPA applicants relative to other similar schools
if the poster, however, was really strapped for money and was only applying to x schools...well no, even then i guess UCLA could be his reach if he wanted to stay in cali haha.
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: UCLA takes people with low UG GPAs
While low GPA at UCLA is a longshot, it's not as much of a long shot as it used to be. They seem to be open to some splitters recently.
- AngryAvocado
- Posts: 774
- Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 11:22 pm
Re: UCLA takes people with low UG GPAs
They also seem to pay attention to quality of UG a little more than their peers, particularly when it comes to splitters.Desert Fox wrote:While low GPA at UCLA is a longshot, it's not as much of a long shot as it used to be. They seem to be open to some splitters recently.
- flyingpanda
- Posts: 824
- Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 5:32 am
Re: UCLA takes people with low UG GPAs
F... U...AngryAvocado wrote:They also seem to pay attention to quality of UG a little more than their peers, particularly when it comes to splitters.Desert Fox wrote:While low GPA at UCLA is a longshot, it's not as much of a long shot as it used to be. They seem to be open to some splitters recently.
- im_blue
- Posts: 3272
- Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 3:53 am
Re: UCLA takes people with low UG GPAs
As long as we're using anecdotes, I know an AA female with a sub-3.0 GPA who is attending Boalt (not class of 2011 though).thisismynewalt wrote:I think it's fair to tell someone not to bother applying to Boalt with a 3.1 and no great softs, especially because I heard Dean Tom actually say that the lowest GPA they accepted out of all applicants for the class of 2011 was a 3.3.
-
- Posts: 204
- Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2009 8:36 am
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Dr. Strangelove
- Posts: 557
- Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2010 5:59 pm
Re: UCLA takes people with low UG GPAs
I don't think UCLA is that big of a GPA whore.
It's probably easier for a splitter to get into UCLA than most of the T14.
It's probably easier for a splitter to get into UCLA than most of the T14.
- Richie Tenenbaum
- Posts: 2118
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 6:17 am
Re: UCLA takes people with low UG GPAs
Based on past numbers, no it's not (in terms of the lower T-14, no argument about T6+berkeley not being that splitter friendly)Dr. Strangelove wrote:I don't think UCLA is that big of a GPA whore.
It's probably easier for a splitter to get into UCLA than most of the T14.
From the last few years off LSN, ppl with 3.0-3.3 and 170-180:
University of Pennsylvania 40.87% 47 - 68
New York University 18.58% 21 - 92
University of Michigan Ann Arbor 40.57% 43 - 63
University of Virginia 30.2% 45 - 104
Duke University 17.07% 14 - 68
Georgetown University 60.22% 112 - 74
Northwestern University 60% 72 - 48
Cornell University 35% 21 - 39
University of California Los Angeles 26.73% 27 - 74
http://www.hourumd.com/?lsat=170-180&gp ... o&range=no
- kitt kat
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 3:39 pm
Re: UCLA takes people with low UG GPAs
I don't know what to say more ---
FUCLA for being so pretentiously stupid
or
FUSC for giving me a shit-for-brains, non-well rounded education and a useless BFA that brought down my GPA
woooo.
FUCLA for being so pretentiously stupid
or
FUSC for giving me a shit-for-brains, non-well rounded education and a useless BFA that brought down my GPA
woooo.
- Dr. Strangelove
- Posts: 557
- Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2010 5:59 pm
Re: UCLA takes people with low UG GPAs
I think this is all a conspiracy so that the only lawyers in the state of California are hard-working idiots..kitt kat wrote:I don't know what to say more ---
FUCLA for being so pretentiously stupid
or
FUSC for giving me a shit-for-brains, non-well rounded education and a useless BFA that brought down my GPA
woooo.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login