I've never understood why Stanford starts enforcing parking at 6 am. It's not like the cops are out their patrolling at 6; in reality they don't start ticketing until 8. Whatever, better for us I guess.ndnlawdc wrote:I guess that's true -- don't park in my EV parking lot. But most are 6-4, M-F. Everyone should just read the signs -- and in the garage nearly all are free.crackberry wrote:To be fair, some spots on campus are 24/7.ndnlawdc wrote:Parking on Saturday and Sunday is free.
In at Stanford! Forum
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: In at Stanford!
- im_blue
- Posts: 3272
- Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 3:53 am
Re: In at Stanford!
Residential spaces are enforced 24/7 (two-letter codes like EA, ES, etc). Commuter spaces (A or C) are enforced M-F 6am-4pm. Metered visitor spaces are enforced M-F 8am-4pm, except for a few meters with 24-hour signs. Some spots allow both residential or commuter permits (e.g. "ES or C") and are enforced during commuter hours. Confused yet?crackberry wrote:I've never understood why Stanford starts enforcing parking at 6 am. It's not like the cops are out their patrolling at 6; in reality they don't start ticketing until 8. Whatever, better for us I guess.ndnlawdc wrote:I guess that's true -- don't park in my EV parking lot. But most are 6-4, M-F. Everyone should just read the signs -- and in the garage nearly all are free.crackberry wrote:To be fair, some spots on campus are 24/7.ndnlawdc wrote:Parking on Saturday and Sunday is free.
Last edited by im_blue on Tue Mar 02, 2010 2:06 am, edited 2 times in total.
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: In at Stanford!
I can't tell you how many tickets I got while I was there for UG. I lived on the row and had an SO permit, but by GF lived in the Cowell cluster in an EA lot with 24/7 spots. I think I got like 25-30 tickets probably.im_blue wrote:Residential spaces are enforced 24/7 (two-letter codes like EA, ES, etc). Commuter spaces (A or C) are enforced M-F 6am-4pm. Metered visitor spaces are enforced M-F 8am-4pm, except for a few meters with 24-hour signs. Some spots allow both residential or commuter permits (e.g. "ES or C") and are enforced during commuter hours. Confused yet?
- CardinalRules
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: In at Stanford!
I've had umpteen warnings but only a couple of tickets.crackberry wrote:I can't tell you how many tickets I got while I was there for UG. I lived on the row and had an SO permit, but by GF lived in the Cowell cluster in an EA lot with 24/7 spots. I think I got like 25-30 tickets probably.im_blue wrote:Residential spaces are enforced 24/7 (two-letter codes like EA, ES, etc). Commuter spaces (A or C) are enforced M-F 6am-4pm. Metered visitor spaces are enforced M-F 8am-4pm, except for a few meters with 24-hour signs. Some spots allow both residential or commuter permits (e.g. "ES or C") and are enforced during commuter hours. Confused yet?
- im_blue
- Posts: 3272
- Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 3:53 am
Re: In at Stanford!
Off topic rant: I once got a "no permit displayed" ticket for parking in an ES lot, with my ES permit displayed on the passenger side. I contacted Parking, which claimed that they don't have time to check both sides of every windshield. If that's the case, then why didn't I get a ticket for the 1 year and 8 months before that? I conclude that either it was a recently hired meter maid, or the Parking department is increasing its efforts to give out tickets. /rantcrackberry wrote:I can't tell you how many tickets I got while I was there for UG. I lived on the row and had an SO permit, but by GF lived in the Cowell cluster in an EA lot with 24/7 spots. I think I got like 25-30 tickets probably.im_blue wrote:Residential spaces are enforced 24/7 (two-letter codes like EA, ES, etc). Commuter spaces (A or C) are enforced M-F 6am-4pm. Metered visitor spaces are enforced M-F 8am-4pm, except for a few meters with 24-hour signs. Some spots allow both residential or commuter permits (e.g. "ES or C") and are enforced during commuter hours. Confused yet?
Last edited by im_blue on Tue Mar 02, 2010 2:08 am, edited 1 time in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: In at Stanford!
I hate that the Stanford "police" (they can't reasonably be called real police) refuse to budge on parking tickets. First, my freshman year, tickets were $20; now they're $45-$60 (outrageous). Second, they literally won't allow you to contest tickets. It is such bullshit. I hate those damn cops. They have nothing better to do than troll for parking tickets and it bothers me to no end.im_blue wrote:Off topic rant: I once got a "no permit displayed" ticket for parking in an ES lot, with my ES permit displayed on the passenger side. I contacted Parking, which claimed that they don't have time to check both sides of every windshield. If that's the case, then why didn't I get a ticket for the 1 year and 8 months before that? I conclude that either it was a recently hired meter maid, or the Parking department is increasing its efforts to give out tickets. /rant
- CardinalRules
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: In at Stanford!
Cops vs. band: who wins the douchery contest?crackberry wrote:I hate that the Stanford "police" (they can't reasonably be called real police) refuse to budge on parking tickets. First, my freshman year, tickets were $20; now they're $45-$60 (outrageous). Second, they literally won't allow you to contest tickets. It is such bullshit. I hate those damn cops. They have nothing better to do than troll for parking tickets and it bothers me to no end.im_blue wrote:Off topic rant: I once got a "no permit displayed" ticket for parking in an ES lot, with my ES permit displayed on the passenger side. I contacted Parking, which claimed that they don't have time to check both sides of every windshield. If that's the case, then why didn't I get a ticket for the 1 year and 8 months before that? I conclude that either it was a recently hired meter maid, or the Parking department is increasing its efforts to give out tickets. /rant
Hint, though: if you're extra-nice and respectful to them, they will let you off the hook.
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: In at Stanford!
Honestly, it's hard to say. Probably the Band, if only because the cops don't reflect badly on the school itself. But if we're talking negative effect on my life, definitely the pigs.CardinalRules wrote:Cops vs. band: who wins the douchery contest?crackberry wrote:I hate that the Stanford "police" (they can't reasonably be called real police) refuse to budge on parking tickets. First, my freshman year, tickets were $20; now they're $45-$60 (outrageous). Second, they literally won't allow you to contest tickets. It is such bullshit. I hate those damn cops. They have nothing better to do than troll for parking tickets and it bothers me to no end.im_blue wrote:Off topic rant: I once got a "no permit displayed" ticket for parking in an ES lot, with my ES permit displayed on the passenger side. I contacted Parking, which claimed that they don't have time to check both sides of every windshield. If that's the case, then why didn't I get a ticket for the 1 year and 8 months before that? I conclude that either it was a recently hired meter maid, or the Parking department is increasing its efforts to give out tickets. /rant
- Kronk
- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: In at Stanford!
Why does everyone hate the Stanford band?
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: In at Stanford!
They are an embarrassment to the school. Yes, some of the shit they do is funny, but when it comes down to it, they are embarrassing. Much of their humor is so esoteric that no one gets it, and they reflect poorly on the University.Kronk wrote:Why does everyone hate the Stanford band?
- CardinalRules
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: In at Stanford!
Aren't we replaying almost verbatim a discussion from another thread? Off to get the DVR.crackberry wrote:They are an embarrassment to the school. Yes, some of the shit they do is funny, but when it comes down to it, they are embarrassing. Much of their humor is so esoteric that no one gets it, and they reflect poorly on the University.Kronk wrote:Why does everyone hate the Stanford band?
- Kronk
- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: In at Stanford!
I've just never seen their shenanigans, I guess.
- CardinalRules
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: In at Stanford!
I don't "see" them anymore, either, because now I avert my eyes. They're either offensive, boring, or both.Kronk wrote:I've just never seen their shenanigans, I guess.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Kronk
- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: In at Stanford!
Stanford band suspended after shows that included circling the field before a game in a white Ford Bronco with bloody handprints on the door, and a halftime show called "What If David Duke Became President of Stanford?"
Wow. First thing I found in google.
- CardinalRules
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: In at Stanford!
+a lot. The Band people should be flattered that a place like TLS discusses them not once but twice.ConMan345 wrote:deja vu
o_O
And Kronk, they've done much worse things. There's a long description on wiki. Highlights include anti-Catholic and anti-Mormon insults.
- Kronk
- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: In at Stanford!
Jeez.CardinalRules wrote:+a lot. The Band people should be flattered that a place like TLS discusses them not once but twice.ConMan345 wrote:deja vu
o_O
And Kronk, they've done much worse things. There's a long description on wiki. Highlights include anti-Catholic and anti-Mormon insults.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Kronk
- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: In at Stanford!
I guess that's why Stanford is only junior ivy.
- CardinalRules
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: In at Stanford!
I may overreact to them sometimes because I'm Catholic and take offense at tasteless anti-Catholic insults, but other non-Catholic friends of mine feel the same way (I don't know whether CB is Catholic).Kronk wrote:Jeez.CardinalRules wrote:+a lot. The Band people should be flattered that a place like TLS discusses them not once but twice.ConMan345 wrote:deja vu
o_O
And Kronk, they've done much worse things. There's a long description on wiki. Highlights include anti-Catholic and anti-Mormon insults.
- Kronk
- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: In at Stanford!
I don't think he's religious. Just me and you. Although I'm actually Protestant, just attend our Catholic church here every so often.
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: In at Stanford!
While you're right, I am very curious how you guessed/inferred that.Kronk wrote:I don't think he's religious.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- ndnlawdc
- Posts: 181
- Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2008 9:09 pm
Re: In at Stanford!
Hmm. If they're truly acting as a municipal government, this would seem like a government denial of a right to due process.crackberry wrote:I hate that the Stanford "police" (they can't reasonably be called real police) refuse to budge on parking tickets. First, my freshman year, tickets were $20; now they're $45-$60 (outrageous). Second, they literally won't allow you to contest tickets. It is such bullshit. I hate those damn cops. They have nothing better to do than troll for parking tickets and it bothers me to no end.im_blue wrote:Off topic rant: I once got a "no permit displayed" ticket for parking in an ES lot, with my ES permit displayed on the passenger side. I contacted Parking, which claimed that they don't have time to check both sides of every windshield. If that's the case, then why didn't I get a ticket for the 1 year and 8 months before that? I conclude that either it was a recently hired meter maid, or the Parking department is increasing its efforts to give out tickets. /rant
- Kronk
- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: In at Stanford!
No quotsiescrackberry wrote:While you're right, I am very curious how you guessed/inferred that.Kronk wrote:I don't think he's religious.
gone
Last edited by Kronk on Tue Mar 02, 2010 1:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- MagicallyDelicious
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 9:22 pm
Re: In at Stanford!
Question to the Stanford-ites...how strictly do Stanford's adcoms adhere to their policy of not looking at Feb. scores even when they're still considering an app? It seems to me like it would be in their best interest to do so...aka if you're holding a 168/3.9 and they pull a 178, why treat them like a 168?
- Kronk
- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: In at Stanford!
People got rejected in similar situations last year. Also at NYU, which claims the same policy.MagicallyDelicious wrote:Question to the Stanford-ites...how strictly do Stanford's adcoms adhere to their policy of not looking at Feb. scores even when they're still considering an app? It seems to me like it would be in their best interest to do so...aka if you're holding a 168/3.9 and they pull a 178, why treat them like a 168?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login