Cornell waiting room Forum

Hopefullawstudent · Post by **Hopefullawstudent** » Wed Feb 03, 2010 1:05 am

managamy wrote:
caliborn wrote:
managamy wrote:When someone like veritas actually expresses "dislike," you know that the object of this uncharacteristic emotion is BAD.

I don't like it either.
Who are you?
Not a Cornell applicant. I just dropped by when I saw that Veritas had posted because I hadn't heard from much him lately.

Which player is your tar managamy?

Burger in a can · Post by **Burger in a can** » Wed Feb 03, 2010 1:15 am

Hopefullawstudent wrote: Which player is your tar managamy?

+1. I always want to know who managamy's tar is...

CardinalRules · Post by **CardinalRules** » Wed Feb 03, 2010 1:17 am

Burger in a can wrote:
Hopefullawstudent wrote: Which player is your tar managamy?
+1. I always want to know who managamy's tar is...

It's Ana Ivanovic, the recently slumping but forever sensuous Serbian star. She's a very nice girl too, by all accounts, kind and intelligent. I was incredibly thrilled to meet her at the Indian Wells tournament last year.

Burger in a can · Post by **Burger in a can** » Wed Feb 03, 2010 1:19 am

managamy wrote:
Burger in a can wrote:
Hopefullawstudent wrote: Which player is your tar managamy?
+1. I always want to know who managamy's tar is...
It's Ana Ivanovic, the recently slumping but forever sensuous Serbian star. She's a very nice girl too, by all accounts, kind and intelligent. I was incredibly thrilled to meet her at the Indian Wells tournament last year.

Have all of your previous tars been Ms. Ivanovic as well? (She's purrrrdy)

CardinalRules · Post by **CardinalRules** » Wed Feb 03, 2010 1:23 am

Burger in a can wrote:
managamy wrote:
Burger in a can wrote:
Hopefullawstudent wrote: Which player is your tar managamy?
+1. I always want to know who managamy's tar is...
It's Ana Ivanovic, the recently slumping but forever sensuous Serbian star. She's a very nice girl too, by all accounts, kind and intelligent. I was incredibly thrilled to meet her at the Indian Wells tournament last year.
Have all of your previous tars been Ms. Ivanovic as well? (She's purrrrdy)

Yes. She's done quite a bit of modeling as well (Vogue, FHM, Hello!, French and Italian magazines), so there are a variety of images and poses from which to choose.

Burger in a can · Post by **Burger in a can** » Wed Feb 03, 2010 1:25 am

managamy wrote:
Yes. She's done quite a bit of modeling as well (Vogue, FHM, Hello!, French and Italian magazines), so there are a variety of images and poses from which to choose.

Thanks! (obsessive google image search, commence!) And sorry for hijacking this thread, Cornellians.

CardinalRules · Post by **CardinalRules** » Wed Feb 03, 2010 1:27 am

Google "FHM Ivanovic" for the really hot ones.

Go on her website at anaivanovic.com, though, for a full collection of her in various outfits and semi-outfits.

Click on media, then gallery, then enjoy.

Snoopy1216 · Post by **Snoopy1216** » Wed Feb 03, 2010 1:28 am

managamy wrote:
Burger in a can wrote:
Hopefullawstudent wrote: Which player is your tar managamy?
+1. I always want to know who managamy's tar is...
It's Ana Ivanovic, the recently slumping but forever sensuous Serbian star. She's a very nice girl too, by all accounts, kind and intelligent. I was incredibly thrilled to meet her at the Indian Wells tournament last year.

ahh, ana... good choice managamy!
tall girls are hot

CardinalRules · Post by **CardinalRules** » Wed Feb 03, 2010 1:30 am

Snoopy1216 wrote:
managamy wrote:
Burger in a can wrote:
Hopefullawstudent wrote: Which player is your tar managamy?
+1. I always want to know who managamy's tar is...
It's Ana Ivanovic, the recently slumping but forever sensuous Serbian star. She's a very nice girl too, by all accounts, kind and intelligent. I was incredibly thrilled to meet her at the Indian Wells tournament last year.
ahh, ana... good choice managamy!
tall girls are hot

+a lot on the tiny part. She and Maria Sharapova have unbelievable bodies; now, if only they could play unbelievable tennis so we could see them on TV more often. (Not that I object to the fashion shoots, though!)

I better stop before a prudish mod times me out for corrupting the minds of TLS-ers.

Snoopy1216 · Post by **Snoopy1216** » Wed Feb 03, 2010 1:35 am

managamy wrote:
+a lot on the tiny part. She and Maria Sharapova have unbelievable bodies; now, if only they could play unbelievable tennis so we could see them on TV more often. (Not that I object to the fashion shoots, though!)

I better stop before a prudish mod times me out for corrupting the minds of TLS-ers.

Haha 1+ on their tennis skills... Atleast Sharapova has the nikon thing going on

Veritas · Post by **Veritas** » Wed Feb 03, 2010 1:47 am

managamy wrote:
+a lot on the tiny part. She and Maria Sharapova have unbelievable bodies; now, if only they could play unbelievable tennis so we could see them on TV more often. (Not that I object to the fashion shoots, though!)

I better stop before a prudish mod times me out for corrupting the minds of TLS-ers.

You're safe, the prudish mod resigned

CardinalRules · Post by **CardinalRules** » Wed Feb 03, 2010 3:46 am

Snoopy1216 wrote:
managamy wrote:
+a lot on the tiny part. She and Maria Sharapova have unbelievable bodies; now, if only they could play unbelievable tennis so we could see them on TV more often. (Not that I object to the fashion shoots, though!)

I better stop before a prudish mod times me out for corrupting the minds of TLS-ers.
Haha 1+ on their tennis skills... Atleast Sharapova has the nikon thing going on

Nikon? It's Canon. Or do you mean Nike? That $70 million contract was the best ever for a female athlete.

Sharapova can hit a ball through a battleship and already has won three major titles, so she's established in the elite for good.

Ivanovic, on the other hand, still has some establishing to do.

Not that any of it really matters when their looks are worth gazillions. Sometimes I wonder why they go through all the training, the practicing, the injuries, the odd hours, and everything else, since they earn more than 90% of their recession-proof wealth (not kidding) sitting in an air-conditioned hotel suite or a gorgeous resort location wearing sexy clothes and smiling at photographers. Tennis must be a lot of fun to play, I guess.

CardinalRules · Post by **CardinalRules** » Wed Feb 03, 2010 3:48 am

Veritas wrote:
managamy wrote:
+a lot on the tiny part. She and Maria Sharapova have unbelievable bodies; now, if only they could play unbelievable tennis so we could see them on TV more often. (Not that I object to the fashion shoots, though!)

I better stop before a prudish mod times me out for corrupting the minds of TLS-ers.
You're safe, the prudish mod resigned

Wait, do you mean someone specific? Or do I just not get the joke? Anyway, I hope that I've enlivened the Cornell thread a bit.

Fancy Pants · Post by **Fancy Pants** » Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:38 am

Veritas wrote:
managamy wrote:
+a lot on the tiny part. She and Maria Sharapova have unbelievable bodies; now, if only they could play unbelievable tennis so we could see them on TV more often. (Not that I object to the fashion shoots, though!)

I better stop before a prudish mod times me out for corrupting the minds of TLS-ers.
You're safe, the prudish mod resigned

QFT

Veritas · Post by **Veritas** » Wed Feb 03, 2010 12:11 pm

managamy wrote:
Veritas wrote:
managamy wrote:
+a lot on the tiny part. She and Maria Sharapova have unbelievable bodies; now, if only they could play unbelievable tennis so we could see them on TV more often. (Not that I object to the fashion shoots, though!)

I better stop before a prudish mod times me out for corrupting the minds of TLS-ers.
You're safe, the prudish mod resigned
Wait, do you mean someone specific? Or do I just not get the joke? Anyway, I hope that I've enlivened the Cornell thread a bit.

I'm referencing myself silly.....FP agrees ^^^

Veritas · Post by **Veritas** » Wed Feb 03, 2010 12:11 pm

managamy wrote:
Veritas wrote:
caliborn wrote:
cendien wrote:This gives me hope... How quickly after sending your app did you receive an email from them (like.. any email at all, not just this one)?
After sending my application through LSAC I received an e-mail confirming their receipt within a week ... I can't give you the exact date b/c I do not have access to my work e-mail. I did not receive an e-mail (that I know of) regarding my complete status. I used the status checker.
I really dislike that tar, cali
When someone like veritas actually expresses "dislike," you know that the object of this uncharacteristic emotion is BAD.

I don't like it either.

EDIT: I don't think that he could dislike the new one.

I do like the new one. I felt the other one was a poor representation of your nice self (and it was scary)

Rovias · Post by **Rovias** » Wed Feb 03, 2010 5:01 pm

Can anyone access the status checker site? I am getting an error message saying my IP address has been blocked.

neimanmarxist · Post by **neimanmarxist** » Wed Feb 03, 2010 5:04 pm

Rovias wrote:Can anyone access the status checker site? I am getting an error message saying my IP address has been blocked.

I just tried and it is not working for me either. I'm on the IP address blacklist! Zomg!

eta: it's a little disconcerting but I'm sure it's just a bug in the system. Maybe they're updating lots of things and that's why

that would be exciting!

BenJ · Post by **BenJ** » Wed Feb 03, 2010 5:05 pm

Rovias wrote:Can anyone access the status checker site? I am getting an error message saying my IP address has been blocked.

Dear Rovias,

You've visited our status checker three thousand, four hundred and ninety-one times in the past 48 hours. This makes us think that you are a psychopath, and we have therefore destroyed your application and blocked your IP address. Our best wishes in all your future endeavors.

Love,
Cornell

I'm getting the IP block, too. I guess it means that they're updating something (software, not the actual applications).

cindytran872 · Post by **cindytran872** » Wed Feb 03, 2010 5:08 pm

Rovias wrote:Can anyone access the status checker site? I am getting an error message saying my IP address has been blocked.

They may not have your email on file even though you sent your application online. I emailed them and I finally got in.

floppymex · Post by **floppymex** » Wed Feb 03, 2010 5:09 pm

Also IP errored.

Rovias · Post by **Rovias** » Wed Feb 03, 2010 5:10 pm

BenJ wrote:
Rovias wrote:Can anyone access the status checker site? I am getting an error message saying my IP address has been blocked.
Dear Rovias,

You've visited our status checker three thousand, four hundred and ninety-one times in the past 48 hours. This makes us think that you are a psychopath, and we have therefore destroyed your application. Our best wishes in all your future endeavors.

Love,
Cornell

I'm getting the IP block, too. I guess it means that they're updating something (software, not the actual applications).

When I saw it I was like they must have seen me compulsively checking this thing! Now I have the shakes from withdrawal

Oh well

aad · Post by **aad** » Wed Feb 03, 2010 5:12 pm

In on Monday. Got an email with the news... still waiting for an admit packet to come in the mail!

Submitted mid-November.

cpboy77 · Post by **cpboy77** » Wed Feb 03, 2010 6:24 pm

aad wrote:In on Monday. Got an email with the news... still waiting for an admit packet to come in the mail!

Submitted mid-November.

Congrats.

WhyBother? · Post by **WhyBother?** » Wed Feb 03, 2010 6:30 pm

The status checker is down for me. It appears to be an error with the website, not my account. Is this happening to anyone else?

Cornell waiting room Forum

Re: Cornell waiting room

Re: Cornell waiting room

Re: Cornell waiting room

Re: Cornell waiting room

Re: Cornell waiting room

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Re: Cornell waiting room

Re: Cornell waiting room

Re: Cornell waiting room

Re: Cornell waiting room

Register for access!

Re: Cornell waiting room

Re: Cornell waiting room

Re: Cornell waiting room

Re: Cornell waiting room

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

Re: Cornell waiting room

Re: Cornell waiting room

Re: Cornell waiting room

Re: Cornell waiting room

Register now!

Re: Cornell waiting room

Re: Cornell waiting room

Re: Cornell waiting room

Re: Cornell waiting room

Register now, it's still FREE!

Re: Cornell waiting room

Re: Cornell waiting room

Re: Cornell waiting room

Re: Cornell waiting room

Seriously? What are you waiting for?