Stanford 2010!!! Forum

[Core]

Bah no JR2 today, hope tomorrow brings a SLS acceptance so I can finally put an end to the anxiety...

[Sakura3210]

Bah no JR2 today, hope tomorrow brings a SLS acceptance so I can finally put an end to the anxiety...

+1000000

I'm sending out a LOCI just in case; I know they say to wait 'til you're waitlisted/held, but not hearing a thing from S. has made me antsy.

[Kretzy]

Giant envelope from SLS in my mailbox today. Freaked out, thinking it was my financial aid award.

Nope, just an invitation to apply for housing, and a copy of the Independence Test that I sent in 3 weeks ago...

[anmo]

Giant envelope from SLS in my mailbox today. Freaked out, thinking it was my financial aid award.

Nope, just an invitation to apply for housing, and a copy of the Independence Test that I sent in 3 weeks ago...

Same... got it yesterday.

[crackberry]

Giant envelope from SLS in my mailbox today. Freaked out, thinking it was my financial aid award.

Nope, just an invitation to apply for housing, and a copy of the Independence Test that I sent in 3 weeks ago...

Haha yeah, I got that a couple days ago and was similarly confused and disappointed upon opening it. Also, a PSA: EV and Rains are NOT cool. I guess if you're married and looking for couples housing, EV is okay, but you would probably be better served getting an apartment off campus at Oak Creek or Sharon Green provided you have a car. If you're single and you can afford Munger, it is SO much nicer than Rains. No one should pick Rains over Munger unless they absolutely cannot stomach the extra cost. Trust me, it is worth it.

[Kronk]

I am meeting an infamous Stanford TLS poaster tomorrow.

[crackberry]

I am meeting an infamous Stanford TLS poaster tomorrow.

Interesting spelling. Also, who? Anyone I know?

[Kronk]

I am meeting an infamous Stanford TLS poaster tomorrow.

Interesting spelling. Also, who? Anyone I know?

Yes, perhaps he/she will out him/herself. And I do most of my poasting in the mornings. It's when I prefer to poast.

[crackberry]

I am meeting an infamous Stanford TLS poaster tomorrow.

Interesting spelling. Also, who? Anyone I know?

Yes, perhaps he/she will out him/herself. And I do most of my poasting in the mornings. It's when I prefer to poast.

Was "infamous" indeed the right word? The only "infamous" Stanford posters I can think of on TLS are myself (blatant me trolling) and CR. The 1Ls who post on here regularly could hardly be called "infamous," and I can't think of any other 0L who I would so immediately ID with Stanford. I suppose you could be referring to an older student, but then I don't really care because I won't get the significance.

[Kretzy]

I am meeting an infamous Stanford TLS poaster tomorrow.

Interesting spelling. Also, who? Anyone I know?

Yes, perhaps he/she will out him/herself. And I do most of my poasting in the mornings. It's when I prefer to poast.

That'd be me. I get to meet the infamous Kronkers tomorrow afternoon up in Dtown.

[crackberry]

I am meeting an infamous Stanford TLS poaster tomorrow.

Interesting spelling. Also, who? Anyone I know?

Yes, perhaps he/she will out him/herself. And I do most of my poasting in the mornings. It's when I prefer to poast.

That'd be me. I get to meet the infamous Kronkers tomorrow afternoon up in Dtown.

Terrible misuse of the word "infamous" on Kronk's part.

[Kronk]

I am meeting an infamous Stanford TLS poaster tomorrow.

Interesting spelling. Also, who? Anyone I know?

Yes, perhaps he/she will out him/herself. And I do most of my poasting in the mornings. It's when I prefer to poast.

Was "infamous" indeed the right word? The only "infamous" Stanford posters I can think of on TLS are myself (blatant me trolling) and CR. The 1Ls who post on here regularly could hardly be called "infamous," and I can't think of any other 0L who I would so immediately ID with Stanford. I suppose you could be referring to an older student, but then I don't really care because I won't get the significance.

Using the wrong word is for sub-170 proles.

[crackberry]

Using the wrong words is for sub-170 proles.

See above post.

[Kronk]

Using the wrong word is for sub-170 proles.

See above post.

Pfft--are you claiming Kretzy isn't MVP?

[crackberry]

Using the wrong word is for sub-170 proles.

See above post.

Pfft--are you claiming Kretzy isn't MVP?

1) I'm not sure what MVP refers to here.
2) I am most certainly claiming that Kretzy cannot reasonable be classified as an "infamous" poster.

For reference:

1. disreputable, ill-famed, notorious. 2. disgraceful, scandalous; nefarious, odious, wicked, shocking, vile, base, heinous, villainous.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/infamous

[Kretzy]

Using the wrong word is for sub-170 proles.

See above post.

Pfft--are you claiming Kretzy isn't MVP?

1) I'm not sure what MVP refers to here.
2) I am most certainly claiming that Kretzy cannot reasonable be classified as an "infamous" poster.

For reference:

1. disreputable, ill-famed, notorious. 2. disgraceful, scandalous; nefarious, odious, wicked, shocking, vile, base, heinous, villainous.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/infamous

I don't like any of those words describing me. Except notorious. RIP Biggie.

[Kronk]

Using the wrong word is for sub-170 proles.

See above post.

Pfft--are you claiming Kretzy isn't MVP?

1) I'm not sure what MVP refers to here.
2) I am most certainly claiming that Kretzy cannot reasonable be classified as an "infamous" poster.

For reference:

1. disreputable, ill-famed, notorious. 2. disgraceful, scandalous; nefarious, odious, wicked, shocking, vile, base, heinous, villainous.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/infamous

tbf, the California lexicon has updated most of those words to mean generally positive things.

[Kronk]

Also, given your "definitions" from the "dictionary," I'd wonder why you're bragging about yourself being an infamous poaster. I believe this proves my point. If not, you're giving yourself far too much credit for annoying people. The only person you successfully troll is me.

[crackberry]

Also, given your "definitions" from the "dictionary," I'd wonder why you're bragging about yourself being an infamous poaster. I believe this proves my point. If not, you're giving yourself far too much credit for annoying people. The only person you successfully troll is me.

When you hear the words "Stanford" and "TLS" who is the first poster you think of?

[Kretzy]

Also, given your "definitions" from the "dictionary," I'd wonder why you're bragging about yourself being an infamous poaster. I believe this proves my point. If not, you're giving yourself far too much credit for annoying people. The only person you successfully troll is me.

When you hear the words "Stanford" and "TLS" who is the first poster you think of?

Everyone but you.

[crackberry]

Also, to quote adameus from the Chicago vs. NYU thread:

wow it seems any thread on here longer than 2 pages gets hijacked by people talking about vaguely related issues and crackberry coming in to whore/troll for Stanford. I don't think crack even has a friend who was considering between Chi and NYU, he just wanted to have a reason to come in here and weasel in some Stanford trolling

http://top-law-schools.com/forums/viewt ... &start=100

[Kronk]

Also, given your "definitions" from the "dictionary," I'd wonder why you're bragging about yourself being an infamous poaster. I believe this proves my point. If not, you're giving yourself far too much credit for annoying people. The only person you successfully troll is me.

When you hear the words "Stanford" and "TLS" who is the first poster you think of?

Doesn't make either of you disreputable. Note that I don't care about intricacies in definition, but you tend to correct my internet grammar so often I feel obligated.

[crackberry]

Also, given your "definitions" from the "dictionary," I'd wonder why you're bragging about yourself being an infamous poaster. I believe this proves my point. If not, you're giving yourself far too much credit for annoying people. The only person you successfully troll is me.

When you hear the words "Stanford" and "TLS" who is the first poster you think of?

Doesn't make either of you disreputable. Note that I don't care about intricacies in definition, but you tend to correct my internet grammar so often I feel obligated.

TBF, your grammar sucks.

[Kronk]

Also, to quote adameus from the Chicago vs. NYU thread:

wow it seems any thread on here longer than 2 pages gets hijacked by people talking about vaguely related issues and crackberry coming in to whore/troll for Stanford. I don't think crack even has a friend who was considering between Chi and NYU, he just wanted to have a reason to come in here and weasel in some Stanford trolling

http://top-law-schools.com/forums/viewt ... &start=100

Really proud of that one eh, boss?

[crackberry]

Also, to quote adameus from the Chicago vs. NYU thread:

wow it seems any thread on here longer than 2 pages gets hijacked by people talking about vaguely related issues and crackberry coming in to whore/troll for Stanford. I don't think crack even has a friend who was considering between Chi and NYU, he just wanted to have a reason to come in here and weasel in some Stanford trolling

http://top-law-schools.com/forums/viewt ... &start=100

Really proud of that one eh, boss?

No, not particularly, but I think it qualifies me as "infamous," which, to be fair, is not a good thing.