Page 1 of 4
.
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2015 10:13 am
by Biglaw1990
.
Re: Semi-Reverse Splitters Unite (2015-2016 cycle)
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2015 11:02 am
by pancakes3
Saves time for everyone to tell you guys to retake.
Re: Semi-Reverse Splitters Unite (2015-2016 cycle)
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2015 11:14 am
by Mack.Hambleton
This is not a thing
Re: Semi-Reverse Splitters Unite (2015-2016 cycle)
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2015 11:17 am
by silenttimer
Mack.Hambleton wrote:This is not a thing
LOL
Re: Semi-Reverse Splitters Unite (2015-2016 cycle)
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2015 11:30 am
by Clearly
Mack.Hambleton wrote:This is not a thing
Re: Semi-Reverse Splitters Unite (2015-2016 cycle)
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2015 11:34 am
by lymenheimer
Guys. Quit being mean to the semi-reverse splitter OP. He may ban you if you say the R-word.
Re: Semi-Reverse Splitters Unite (2015-2016 cycle)
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2015 11:46 am
by Biglaw1990
.
Post removed.
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2015 11:57 am
by benwyatt
Post removed.
Re: Semi-Reverse Splitters Unite (2015-2016 cycle)
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2015 12:03 pm
by JD116
This is so much not a thing that you could write a diversity statement on this.
*meta
Re: Semi-Reverse Splitters Unite (2015-2016 cycle)
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2015 12:10 pm
by emkay625
Yeah I don't see how an LSAT score in the 97th percentile and a 4.0 makes you a splitter in any sense of the word.
Post removed.
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2015 12:15 pm
by benwyatt
Post removed.
Re: Semi-Reverse Splitters Unite (2015-2016 cycle)
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2015 12:16 pm
by mintme
Post removed.
Re: Semi-Reverse Splitters Unite (2015-2016 cycle)
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2015 12:22 pm
by Clemenceau
OP take a lap
Then retake the lsat
And pull your ED app before its too late
Post removed.
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2015 12:24 pm
by ugg
Post removed.
Re: Semi-Reverse Splitters Unite (2015-2016 cycle)
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2015 12:27 pm
by lymenheimer
Clemenceau wrote:OP take a lap
Then retake the lsat
And pull your ED app before its too late
banned
Re: Semi-Reverse Splitters Unite (2015-2016 cycle)
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2015 12:29 pm
by emkay625
OP I know you don't like the r word, so I won't use it. But just 3 or 4 LSAT points would mean tens of thousands, and maybe 100K+, in scholarship money. If you haven't maxed out your r******, you should give it a shot in December. I think you will be admitted at many of the schools you have applied to, but it will be at sticker or with little $. Your future self will be kicking yourself for not trying to minimize your debt.
Sincerely,
a recent graduate who has just started making loan payments
Re: Semi-Reverse Splitters Unite (2015-2016 cycle)
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2015 12:30 pm
by A. Nony Mouse
To be fair to the OP, people have created these threads in at least one other application cycle. (Still doesn't make it a thing, but he's not the originator.)
Re: Semi-Reverse Splitters Unite (2015-2016 cycle)
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2015 12:49 pm
by Biglaw1990
.
Re: Semi-Reverse Splitters Unite (2015-2016 cycle)
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2015 12:55 pm
by Generally
Biglaw1990 wrote:emkay625 wrote:OP I know you don't like the r word, so I won't use it. But just 3 or 4 LSAT points would mean tens of thousands, and maybe 100K+, in scholarship money. If you haven't maxed out your r******, you should give it a shot in December. I think you will be admitted at many of the schools you have applied to, but it will be at sticker or with little $. Your future self will be kicking yourself for not trying to minimize your debt.
Sincerely,
a recent graduate who has just started making loan payments
I am actually scheduled to "r-word" in December, since I was scoring in the low to mid 170s. I will be graduating with little (30-40k) to no debt so I'm not against EDing. Moreover, Penn is my top choice.
You realize EDing means your little $30,000-$40,000 could easily turn into like $330,000 to $340,000? If your cool with that, have at it.
Re: Semi-Reverse Splitters Unite (2015-2016 cycle)
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2015 12:58 pm
by Biglaw1990
.
Re: Semi-Reverse Splitters Unite (2015-2016 cycle)
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2015 1:02 pm
by Generally
Biglaw1990 wrote:Generally wrote:Biglaw1990 wrote:emkay625 wrote:OP I know you don't like the r word, so I won't use it. But just 3 or 4 LSAT points would mean tens of thousands, and maybe 100K+, in scholarship money. If you haven't maxed out your r******, you should give it a shot in December. I think you will be admitted at many of the schools you have applied to, but it will be at sticker or with little $. Your future self will be kicking yourself for not trying to minimize your debt.
Sincerely,
a recent graduate who has just started making loan payments
I am actually scheduled to "r-word" in December, since I was scoring in the low to mid 170s. I will be graduating with little (30-40k) to no debt so I'm not against EDing. Moreover, Penn is my top choice.
You realize EDing means your little $30,000-$40,000 could easily turn into like $330,000 to $340,000? If your cool with that, have at it.
My family will be paying for most, if not all of it, so I don't see how that's quite possible. Perhaps you can explain.
Lucky you then. Have at it, my advice was qualified to those who don't have the luxury to throw $200,000 away.
Post removed.
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2015 1:04 pm
by Hildegard15
Post removed.
Re: Semi-Reverse Splitters Unite (2015-2016 cycle)
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2015 1:07 pm
by Fiddlesticks
.
Re: Semi-Reverse Splitters Unite (2015-2016 cycle)
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2015 1:10 pm
by Clearly
Fiddlesticks wrote:You could not be an immature puke and try to save your family 200k. If I saw my kid saying "well my family will pay for it, so fuck it" id beat him into next year.
Yeah seriously. You get a few more questions right and your parents get 300k. Don't be a dick, money is money.
Re: Semi-Reverse Splitters Unite (2015-2016 cycle)
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2015 1:11 pm
by JD116
Folks, let's give OP a break. At the end of the day, they get to make their own decisions. OP never asked for our critique of the forum idea. If no one can relate to it, then just don't post. Market demand will drive the thread. If it dies, it dies. The thread was made to be a productive outlet, not a place for condescension and divisiveness surrounding socioeconomic background. Believe me, I agree with the majority that OP should not ED if they would prefer a T-6 over UPenn.