Page 1 of 1

WL

Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 12:45 pm
by Paramont86
Who expects scholarships off the waitlist?

Re: WL

Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 12:46 pm
by helix23
ooo ME ME

Re: WL

Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 1:45 pm
by nickb285
.

Re: WL

Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 1:48 pm
by TheThriller
Cooley gives big $$$ of the WL

Re: WL

Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 1:55 pm
by SteelPenguin
TheThriller wrote:Cooley gives big $$$ of the WL
Cooley doesn't really have a WL, does it?

Re: WL

Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 3:31 pm
by callmemaybe84
SteelPenguin wrote:
TheThriller wrote:Cooley gives big $$$ of the WL
Cooley doesn't really have a WL, does it?
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/haroman415

and, harshly:

http://lawschoolnumbers.com/MissLaw87

Re: WL

Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 3:31 pm
by FKASunny
callmemaybe84 wrote:
SteelPenguin wrote:
TheThriller wrote:Cooley gives big $$$ of the WL
Cooley doesn't really have a WL, does it?
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/haroman415
Oh, man…

Re: WL

Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 3:42 pm
by nickb285
.

Re: WL

Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 3:49 pm
by luxurylawyer
callmemaybe84 wrote:
SteelPenguin wrote:
TheThriller wrote:Cooley gives big $$$ of the WL
Cooley doesn't really have a WL, does it?
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/haroman415
I was initially shocked that Cooley doesn't accept everyone that applies. That was until I read this. "I took the LSATS three times in the past year attempting to get a better score." Maybe (s)he's just a bad test taker...

Re: WL

Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 3:51 pm
by FKASunny
luxurylawyer wrote:
callmemaybe84 wrote:
SteelPenguin wrote:
TheThriller wrote:Cooley gives big $$$ of the WL
Cooley doesn't really have a WL, does it?
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/haroman415
I was initially shocked that Cooley doesn't accept everyone that applies. That was until I read this. "I took the LSATS three times in the past year attempting to get a better score." Maybe (s)he's just a bad test taker...
Wouldn't she statistically score better if she just answered "C" for every question?

Re: WL

Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 3:59 pm
by luxurylawyer
ლ(ಠ益ಠლ) wrote:
luxurylawyer wrote:
I was initially shocked that Cooley doesn't accept everyone that applies. That was until I read this. "I took the LSATS three times in the past year attempting to get a better score." Maybe (s)he's just a bad test taker...
Wouldn't she statistically score better if she just answered "C" for every question?
On the October LSAT, a 142 was 42 correct out of 100. Assuming that the answers were evenly distributed amongst A-E, answering C every time would have resulted in a 126. I'm not really certain a 126 is that much worse than a 142, though.

Re: WL

Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 4:09 pm
by untar614
Ouch. Hate to say it, but it's probably for the best that first girl didn't get in anywhere. The second one is gonna have a rough time with that OOS debt and 20% employment.

I don't want to be mean to people who aren't good at these tests, but they got less than half of the questions right and were in ~16th %ile. Can you really think that they should be lawyers given that? The ABA shouldn't be allowing these schools who are taking so many students who can't even answer half the LSAT correctly. Who you wanna be operated on by a doctor who couldn't even hit 20 on the MCAT? Maybe if it was because s/he straight up could barely speak English (but had a good translator!)



As to the original question, I asked the same thing, and apparently people do get money from the waitlist if the numbers and negotiating is good. I was shown a girl who got 105k off the waitlist from UChicago