Page 1 of 1
VETO UW
Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2013 11:24 am
by justathought21
UW has chosen to take a stance that since its school is "so affordable" that there is no need for scholarship offers for many of its students.
Given the current economic climate and employment prospect I respectfully disagree.
So, here is my response to UW: thanks but not thanks.
Who is going to join me?
Re: VETO UW
Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2013 11:26 am
by ironbmike
I'M VETOING HARVARD BECAUSE THEY HAVE TAKEN THE POSITION THAT I'M NOT GOOD ENOUGH TO GET IN
Re: VETO UW
Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2013 11:28 am
by justathought21
Awesome....You hear that Harvard: YOU ARE OUT...You have been VETOED!
Re: VETO UW
Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2013 11:28 am
by Rheastoria
ironbmike wrote:I'M VETOING HARVARD BECAUSE THEY HAVE TAKEN THE POSITION THAT I'M NOT GOOD ENOUGH TO GET IN
+1
Re: VETO UW
Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2013 11:29 am
by MacB
I'm vetoing this thread, justathought21, and also Harvard for not letting me in.
Re: VETO UW
Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2013 11:31 am
by justathought21
Awesome, but the great thing about the thread and me, is that we were not going to place the proverbial Golden Handcuffs on ya!
So, thread, justathought21, and Harvard....YOU have been VETOED!
Re: VETO UW
Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2013 11:35 am
by MacB
Can I veto Penn while we're at it, for waitlisting me like a little bitch?
Re: VETO UW
Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2013 11:37 am
by ironbmike
MacB wrote:Can I veto Penn while we're at it, for waitlisting me like a little bitch?
I have a couple of schools on my veto-waitlist. You should create one.
Re: VETO UW
Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2013 11:42 am
by postard
Yeah, they should have tailored that email to in state applicants only.
Re: VETO UW
Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2013 12:00 pm
by romothesavior
This is your thread for discussing this issue. Do not start another thread on the topic or you will be banned.
Re: VETO UW
Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2013 12:15 pm
by mehh
ironbmike wrote:I'M VETOING HARVARD BECAUSE THEY HAVE TAKEN THE POSITION THAT I'M NOT GOOD ENOUGH TO GET IN
+1 hahahah
Re: VETO UW
Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2013 12:23 pm
by sublime
..
Re: VETO UW
Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2013 12:24 pm
by patricksouthern
If this is a troll attempt, this is spectacular.
If this is not a troll attempt, 145.
Re: VETO UW
Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2013 2:55 pm
by WisemanAEKDB
If you don't want to go to UW, great. I'll gladly take your spot off of the waitlist.
Re: VETO UW
Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2013 3:10 pm
by justathought21
sublime12089 wrote:You really should learn what the word veto means before attending law school.
A veto – Latin for "I forbid"...used in a sentence: UW "I forbid" you to place Golden Handcuffs on me....aka: UW, YOU have been VETOED
Re: VETO UW
Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2013 3:31 pm
by romothesavior
justathought21 wrote:sublime12089 wrote:You really should learn what the word veto means before attending law school.
A veto – Latin for "I forbid"...used in a sentence: UW "I forbid" you to place Golden Handcuffs on me....aka: UW, YOU have been VETOED
Hi, I'm the word boycott, have we met?
Unless you mean "veto" as in, "I will veto your next thread if you make another one on this subject."
Re: VETO UW
Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2013 3:38 pm
by dsn32
Epic thread is epic. I vote Veto. Too cool for school obviously.
Re: VETO UW
Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2013 12:19 am
by atay
I'm just glad justathought21 learned that it's veto, not vetoe...