Did they give any insight on what types of employment they want while in the PT program? Is it any type just FT employment?YYZ wrote:My understanding from talking to lawyers in Dallas is that, in general, they are impressed with the PT students for 2 reasons:
1. Working full time and going to law school is very difficult; and
2. Work experience/maturity is looked upon favorably.
I would definitely attend FT if you have the opportunity. PT or FT, law school takes up a ton of your time, so it's nice if you can devote 100% to it.
But, if the PT works better for you, I think the opportunities are out there.
SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle) Forum
-
- Posts: 274
- Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2012 11:45 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
- StylinNProfilin
- Posts: 410
- Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 4:27 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Just sent off my application, ready for the long wait.
October LSAT takers were down 16%, lowest June & October takers since 2000-2001.TheJanitor6203 wrote:Why do you think the apps are down? Has this been a trend over the past few years or just this year?
- kalvano
- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
YYZ wrote:My understanding from talking to lawyers in Dallas is that, in general, they are impressed with the PT students for 2 reasons:
1. Working full time and going to law school is very difficult; and
2. Work experience/maturity is looked upon favorably.
I would definitely attend FT if you have the opportunity. PT or FT, law school takes up a ton of your time, so it's nice if you can devote 100% to it.
But, if the PT works better for you, I think the opportunities are out there.
Caveat - if you are 22 and in the PT program and working as a law firm secretary 9 - 3, I think they know you couldn't get into the FT program, and that might hurt you.
-
- Posts: 343
- Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 12:32 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Having been through OCI, I think it is a little more nuanced than this. For the vast majority of OCI firms, PT vs. FT is meaningless. Of the remaining firms, there are a handful that don't hire PT students and a handful that are very passionate about hiring PT students. For the firms that don't hire PT, it could be an age issue (average PT student is older). A key point to keep in mind about legal hiring is that it is not linear. So many variables go into hiring decisions that I caution anybody from applying any hard and fast rules to legal hiring or assuming that any one variable is always a positive or negative.YYZ wrote:My understanding from talking to lawyers in Dallas is that, in general, they are impressed with the PT students for 2 reasons:
1. Working full time and going to law school is very difficult; and
2. Work experience/maturity is looked upon favorably.
I would definitely attend FT if you have the opportunity. PT or FT, law school takes up a ton of your time, so it's nice if you can devote 100% to it.
But, if the PT works better for you, I think the opportunities are out there.
- JXander
- Posts: 966
- Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 10:23 am
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
.
Last edited by JXander on Mon Mar 25, 2013 9:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- TheRedBlueBerry
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 3:12 am
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
JakeAsch wrote:I was the first applicant to be accepted to SMU. They typically do not release decisions before January, but there were extenuating circumstances in my case.
154; 3.9; URM; male.
Awesome, Congrats!!
Last edited by TheRedBlueBerry on Tue Dec 04, 2012 8:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- mg7
- Posts: 237
- Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 3:15 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
congrats manJakeAsch wrote:I was the first applicant to be accepted to SMU. They typically do not release decisions before January, but there were extenuating circumstances in my case.
154; 3.9; URM; male.
- TheJanitor6203
- Posts: 879
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2012 5:12 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Congradulations!JakeAsch wrote:I was the first applicant to be accepted to SMU. They typically do not release decisions before January, but there were extenuating circumstances in my case.
154; 3.9; URM; male.
Just curious if you wanted to share that "extenuating circumstance"???
-
- Posts: 204
- Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 3:33 am
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
you're a lucky manJakeAsch wrote:I was the first applicant to be accepted to SMU. They typically do not release decisions before January, but there were extenuating circumstances in my case.
154; 3.9; URM; male.
-
- Posts: 700
- Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 2:43 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I've never met any night students that actually work during the day. The night program is a good way to back door yourself into better grades, though.YYZ wrote:My understanding from talking to lawyers in Dallas is that, in general, they are impressed with the PT students for 2 reasons:
1. Working full time and going to law school is very difficult; and
2. Work experience/maturity is looked upon favorably.
I would definitely attend FT if you have the opportunity. PT or FT, law school takes up a ton of your time, so it's nice if you can devote 100% to it.
But, if the PT works better for you, I think the opportunities are out there.
-
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 11:01 am
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Accepted via status checker 12/13. My status date changed to today a couple of hours ago and then when I just checked again it said admitted! Good luck to everyone!
- JXander
- Posts: 966
- Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 10:23 am
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Congratulations! Is SMU high on your list or will you wait for scholarship info before making that placement?nmlf16 wrote:Accepted via status checker 12/13. My status date changed to today a couple of hours ago and then when I just checked again it said admitted! Good luck to everyone!
-
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 11:01 am
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
They're not particularly high on my list, but scholarship money could change that. I'm not expecting too much to be offered though.JakeAsch wrote:Congratulations! Is SMU high on your list or will you wait for scholarship info before making that placement?nmlf16 wrote:Accepted via status checker 12/13. My status date changed to today a couple of hours ago and then when I just checked again it said admitted! Good luck to everyone!
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 204
- Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 3:33 am
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Did you get an email to say to check or did you just randomly check and it said you were in?nmlf16 wrote:They're not particularly high on my list, but scholarship money could change that. I'm not expecting too much to be offered though.JakeAsch wrote:Congratulations! Is SMU high on your list or will you wait for scholarship info before making that placement?nmlf16 wrote:Accepted via status checker 12/13. My status date changed to today a couple of hours ago and then when I just checked again it said admitted! Good luck to everyone!
-
- Posts: 138
- Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2011 11:57 am
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Also in today!!! Yay!!bgoodrick wrote:Did you get an email to say to check or did you just randomly check and it said you were in?nmlf16 wrote:They're not particularly high on my list, but scholarship money could change that. I'm not expecting too much to be offered though.JakeAsch wrote:Congratulations! Is SMU high on your list or will you wait for scholarship info before making that placement?nmlf16 wrote:Accepted via status checker 12/13. My status date changed to today a couple of hours ago and then when I just checked again it said admitted! Good luck to everyone!
I only checked because I saw several people posting about acceptances, but I didn't get an email or anything like that letting me know.
I went complete 11/2.
-
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 11:01 am
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I just checked. I haven't gotten any e-mails from them yet. I submitted my app on 11/16, got my status checker and went complete on 11/26. 162/3.92bgoodrick wrote:Did you get an email to say to check or did you just randomly check and it said you were in?nmlf16 wrote:They're not particularly high on my list, but scholarship money could change that. I'm not expecting too much to be offered though.JakeAsch wrote:Congratulations! Is SMU high on your list or will you wait for scholarship info before making that placement?nmlf16 wrote:Accepted via status checker 12/13. My status date changed to today a couple of hours ago and then when I just checked again it said admitted! Good luck to everyone!
- JXander
- Posts: 966
- Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 10:23 am
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
You should get in. Especially if you are a URM.nmlf16 wrote:
I just checked. I haven't gotten any e-mails from them yet. I submitted my app on 11/16, got my status checker and went complete on 11/26. 162/3.92
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 3:50 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
In yesterday as well. 166 and 3.68. Is anyone else having trouble getting into the admitted students website? The password and username that they gave me doesn't seem to be working.
-
- Posts: 138
- Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2011 11:57 am
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
No I was having the same problem logging in. Several other schools I've been accepted to though don't activate their admitted students sections until January though so maybe SMU just hasn't activated or finished theirs yet either.DavidAg wrote:In yesterday as well. 166 and 3.68. Is anyone else having trouble getting into the admitted students website? The password and username that they gave me doesn't seem to be working.
I guess someone could always call and ask though?
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 3:50 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
^ Yeah that makes sense. I'm wanting to get on there because of the private scholarships they said that we should look up. Have you applied for any of those?
-
- Posts: 138
- Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2011 11:57 am
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I think they're probably referring to the Sumners and some of the other big ones they list elsewhere on their site. I didn't really think I fit the bill for any of them though... (I.E. One specifies you have to be a resident from a list of certain states, and I'm not from any of them, etc.)DavidAg wrote:^ Yeah that makes sense. I'm wanting to get on there because of the private scholarships they said that we should look up. Have you applied for any of those?
But I'm really hoping I qualify for some sort of merit aid as SMU is pretty pricey!
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- JXander
- Posts: 966
- Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 10:23 am
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Admissions just called and said they're sending me scholarship information and the official acceptance packet today.
- kalvano
- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Holy shit. SMU did something before January 31st?
Grab the kids and run to the basement, because the Apocalypse is nigh.
Grab the kids and run to the basement, because the Apocalypse is nigh.
-
- Posts: 138
- Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2011 11:57 am
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Haha my mind was blown! Reading through the past few year's thread, I never expected to hear anything before January or even February. Pleasantly surprisedkalvano wrote:Holy shit. SMU did something before January 31st?
Grab the kids and run to the basement, because the Apocalypse is nigh.
I also got that call to congratulate me on admission and to encourage me to apply for scholarships. Hope that means good things!
Keeping my fingers crossed for everyone still waiting!
- JXander
- Posts: 966
- Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 10:23 am
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Yeah...I wasn't lying when I said they called to admit me at the end of November... I guess this truly is unusual.kalvano wrote:Holy shit. SMU did something before January 31st?
Grab the kids and run to the basement, because the Apocalypse is nigh.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login