Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle) Forum
- sublime
- Posts: 17385
- Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:21 pm
- romanticegotist
- Posts: 1773
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 4:15 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Acceptance package came in the mail and a FULL RIDE (WTF) along with it. I laughed out loud and said "I forgive you for your '167 or bust' hubris now." But now I've got some decisions to make....
-
- Posts: 2578
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:33 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Congrats man! That's so strange that when they were gunning for a 167 they didnt give out full rides, now everyone with a 166 is getting them....interesting.romanticegotist wrote:Acceptance package came in the mail and a FULL RIDE (WTF) along with it. I laughed out loud and said "I forgive you for your '167 or bust' hubris now." But now I've got some decisions to make....
- romanticegotist
- Posts: 1773
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 4:15 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Yeah they have certainly done some strange things this cycle, but I'm not gonna spend too much time questioning it. Do you think it would work if the 167s now came in and asked 'hey, where's my money?!'wannabelawstudent wrote:Congrats man! That's so strange that when they were gunning for a 167 they didnt give out full rides, now everyone with a 166 is getting them....interesting.romanticegotist wrote:Acceptance package came in the mail and a FULL RIDE (WTF) along with it. I laughed out loud and said "I forgive you for your '167 or bust' hubris now." But now I've got some decisions to make....
-
- Posts: 2578
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:33 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I'd hope so but it doesnt sound like anyone is having very much luck, maybe after the first deposit.romanticegotist wrote:Yeah they have certainly done some strange things this cycle, but I'm not gonna spend too much time questioning it. Do you think it would work if the 167s now came in and asked 'hey, where's my money?!'wannabelawstudent wrote:Congrats man! That's so strange that when they were gunning for a 167 they didnt give out full rides, now everyone with a 166 is getting them....interesting.romanticegotist wrote:Acceptance package came in the mail and a FULL RIDE (WTF) along with it. I laughed out loud and said "I forgive you for your '167 or bust' hubris now." But now I've got some decisions to make....
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Nova
- Posts: 9102
- Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:55 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
No. The 167s dont have 3.8s too, dude.romanticegotist wrote:Yeah they have certainly done some strange things this cycle, but I'm not gonna spend too much time questioning it. Do you think it would work if the 167s now came in and asked 'hey, where's my money?!'wannabelawstudent wrote:Congrats man! That's so strange that when they were gunning for a 167 they didnt give out full rides, now everyone with a 166 is getting them....interesting.romanticegotist wrote:Acceptance package came in the mail and a FULL RIDE (WTF) along with it. I laughed out loud and said "I forgive you for your '167 or bust' hubris now." But now I've got some decisions to make....
- romanticegotist
- Posts: 1773
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 4:15 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
haha fair, and the 167s didn't chide the admissions director over the phone for over-emphasizing the LSAT median (which this guy may or may not have done ).Nova wrote:No. The 167s dont have 3.8s too, dude.romanticegotist wrote:Yeah they have certainly done some strange things this cycle, but I'm not gonna spend too much time questioning it. Do you think it would work if the 167s now came in and asked 'hey, where's my money?!'wannabelawstudent wrote:Congrats man! That's so strange that when they were gunning for a 167 they didnt give out full rides, now everyone with a 166 is getting them....interesting.romanticegotist wrote:Acceptance package came in the mail and a FULL RIDE (WTF) along with it. I laughed out loud and said "I forgive you for your '167 or bust' hubris now." But now I've got some decisions to make....
On an unrelated note, I seem to recall a point in this thread, maybe it was another one, where a biglaw alum talked for a bit about the MN legal market. Anyone know what pages that was on?
-
- Posts: 2578
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:33 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Did you really? I want details haha....romanticegotist wrote:
haha fair, and the 167s didn't chide the admissions director over the phone for over-emphasizing the LSAT median (which this guy may or may not have done ).
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Minnesota may have just decided to stop giving a shit about its LSAT median halfway through the cycle. 172 here with an equal or lower aid award than tons of mid 160'swannabelawstudent wrote:Did you really? I want details haha....romanticegotist wrote:
haha fair, and the 167s didn't chide the admissions director over the phone for over-emphasizing the LSAT median (which this guy may or may not have done ).
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2012 12:50 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Like a few others here, I was initially waitlisted, accepted via phone call, then received the admit packet in the mail informing me about a full ride (!!!!!) I wish I always came home from work to such good news!
- BitterSplitter
- Posts: 244
- Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2012 2:17 am
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
.
Last edited by BitterSplitter on Thu Jun 13, 2013 3:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- dproduct
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 8:58 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Seems like 166, above the 25th but below median yields the 84k scholarship. 166 above the median is a full-ride.
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2012 12:50 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
3.75 and, I don't know how much it mattered,, but I had strong softs, a post-college fellowship and work experience.BitterSplitter wrote:what range is your GPA in?kdb wrote:Like a few others here, I was initially waitlisted, accepted via phone call, then received the admit packet in the mail informing me about a full ride (!!!!!) I wish I always came home from work to such good news!
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- sublime
- Posts: 17385
- Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:21 pm
- Presidentjlh
- Posts: 865
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 6:07 am
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Sounds like I should expect an 84k scholarship then.
- romanticegotist
- Posts: 1773
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 4:15 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I'm getting the impression that nobody in the admissions office follows TLS, or they'd know that we know the scholarships are wonky all of a sudden. Still, congrats to new admits!
-
- Posts: 94
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 7:38 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Yeah, it is frustrating to me a bit... wish they were open to negotiation.romanticegotist wrote:I'm getting the impression that nobody in the admissions office follows TLS, or they'd know that we know the scholarships are wonky all of a sudden. Still, congrats to new admits!
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 3311
- Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:04 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
They do negotiate with some people.historicrep wrote:Yeah, it is frustrating to me a bit... wish they were open to negotiation.romanticegotist wrote:I'm getting the impression that nobody in the admissions office follows TLS, or they'd know that we know the scholarships are wonky all of a sudden. Still, congrats to new admits!
-
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:13 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
minnbills wrote:They do negotiate with some people.historicrep wrote:Yeah, it is frustrating to me a bit... wish they were open to negotiation.romanticegotist wrote:I'm getting the impression that nobody in the admissions office follows TLS, or they'd know that we know the scholarships are wonky all of a sudden. Still, congrats to new admits!
They do? I tried to negotiate, and it seemed to me in the e-mail that they did not even consider it.
- alwayssunnyinfl
- Posts: 4100
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 9:34 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
NIUmelk wrote:minnbills wrote:They do negotiate with some people.historicrep wrote:Yeah, it is frustrating to me a bit... wish they were open to negotiation.romanticegotist wrote:I'm getting the impression that nobody in the admissions office follows TLS, or they'd know that we know the scholarships are wonky all of a sudden. Still, congrats to new admits!
They do? I tried to negotiate, and it seemed to me in the e-mail that they did not even consider it.
minnbills wrote: They do negotiate with some people.
- Xs20
- Posts: 815
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 8:03 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I sent a negotiation email yesterday. Will report back with their response.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 94
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 7:38 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Yeah, I understand that, I'm talking at a wider level.minnbills wrote:They do negotiate with some people.historicrep wrote:Yeah, it is frustrating to me a bit... wish they were open to negotiation.romanticegotist wrote:I'm getting the impression that nobody in the admissions office follows TLS, or they'd know that we know the scholarships are wonky all of a sudden. Still, congrats to new admits!
If the 167 isn't all that important to them anymore in this cycle, that's that.
-
- Posts: 2578
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:33 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I just find it ironic that they were so "167 or die" but didn't offer the kinda money they're giving 166 now, it's kinda a slap in the face. They could've had my 167 (and I'm sure a few others) for a full ride.historicrep wrote:Yeah, I understand that, I'm talking at a wider level.minnbills wrote:They do negotiate with some people.historicrep wrote:Yeah, it is frustrating to me a bit... wish they were open to negotiation.romanticegotist wrote:I'm getting the impression that nobody in the admissions office follows TLS, or they'd know that we know the scholarships are wonky all of a sudden. Still, congrats to new admits!
If the 167 isn't all that important to them anymore in this cycle, that's that.
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I think the full rides are only going out to above median GPAs. Even so, it is a pretty big slap in the face to high lsats. Seems like getting a scholarship package early (december) was a deathknell if you wanted a full ride... there were hardly any offered at that time. Seems it's preferable to apply very late in the cycle to Minnesota with median numbers when they will do anything to grab you.wannabelawstudent wrote: I just find it ironic that they were so "167 or die" but didn't offer the kinda money they're giving 166 now, it's kinda a slap in the face. They could've had my 167 (and I'm sure a few others) for a full ride.
that said, congrats to all the new admitted students!
-
- Posts: 94
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 7:38 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I absolutely agree... a full tuition ride would have had me signing a lease. $84,000 is great, need to see if they'll be beaten by Indiana or Washington now.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login