ssanonymous wrote:Definitely clears things up. Thank you!
You're welcome
elterrible78 wrote:Because Yale seems a lot less numbers-based than some other schools (and when I say that, I really mean to say that great numbers don't seem to be enough), what kind of things do you think make someone an auto-admit?
The kind of softs that you, elterrible, already have
But seriously, it's whatever Asha decides.
This is all I could find on the matter:
There are roughly 50-80 applicants each year who are "presumptive admits" and who bypass the three reader process. Instead, they are reviewed by myself and a a faculty member who serves as the Chair of the Admissions Committee. These are students who are truly outstanding in every way, not just scores -- again, we are trying to fill the class with interesting and well-rounded students, not just students who can take tests well! It's hard to articulate what places a student into the presumptive admit category, so I'll just borrow Justice Potter Stewart's view: I know it when I see it.
I also attempted to look up backgrounds on some of the previous cycle's auto-admits (yes, including you, ElstonGunn
) but nothing really stands out. Some have ivy undergrads, some have non-prestigious undergrads; some are K-JD, some are non-traditional, some have advanced degrees; some have an average resume, some have strong work or PI experience; some have academic awards with publications, some have academic awards but no publications; some have 180s, some have 174s; some have 4.0s, some have 3.8s.
And no Nobel Prize winners, although I doubt they'd be on LSN or TLS anyway.