No, nothing like that. Good softs: work experience, speaks several languages, extracurriculars, etc. And my app. was not generic, it was specific and included an Epstein public interest essay.timeandspace11 wrote:Sorry to hear that. Im shocked you were waitlisted. Any disciplinary issues?Mdenis1 wrote:WL email numbers in profile, my app was specific and UCLA-tailored
UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
- Mdenis1
- Posts: 356
- Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2012 2:06 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
- CO2016YEAH
- Posts: 578
- Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2012 11:42 am
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Tough break. Sorry to hear about the WL. The consolation is that you are already in at Boalt, GTown, and a few other fine, fine, schools. And you still may get in off the WL. Good luck!Mdenis1 wrote:No, nothing like that. Good softs: work experience, speaks several languages, extracurriculars, etc. And my app. was not generic, it was specific and included an Epstein public interest essay.timeandspace11 wrote:Sorry to hear that. Im shocked you were waitlisted. Any disciplinary issues?Mdenis1 wrote:WL email numbers in profile, my app was specific and UCLA-tailored
Westwood is just fine. I've still got my fingers crossed.
- francesfarmer
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:52 am
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
WL email today. 3.4/172/no Why UCLA.
- hhockberger
- Posts: 174
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2012 3:28 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
WL as well
- FallingHigher
- Posts: 113
- Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 4:18 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Is was nice while it lasted. WL by email :/
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Mdenis1
- Posts: 356
- Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2012 2:06 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Shit :/ What were your #s?!FallingHigher wrote:Is was nice while it lasted. WL by email :/
Random thought : I had already been admitted by Berk when I got WL by UCLA, can it be linked?! Like do deans of UC schools shared lists of admitted applicants and maybe UCLA thought it was pointless to admit me ever since Berk is more highly ranked?! Especially in my case, as an international applicant, I obviously have no ties to Los Angeles, maybe they would treat differently someone already in at Berkeley but with LA ties.
- bellagio
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 11:08 am
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
No, graduate schools aren't linked so closely as the undergrad institutions are. Sorry to say that In your case, I'm sure if you submitted an LOCI or two, they'd be happy to accept you, probably with some money. Were you hoping to go to UCLA by any chance?Mdenis1 wrote:Shit :/ What were your #s?!FallingHigher wrote:Is was nice while it lasted. WL by email :/
Random thought : I had already been admitted by Berk when I got WL by UCLA, can it be linked?! Like do deans of UC schools shared lists of admitted applicants and maybe UCLA thought it was pointless to admit me ever since Berk is more highly ranked?! Especially in my case, as an international applicant, I obviously have no ties to Los Angeles, maybe they would treat differently someone already in at Berkeley but with LA ties.
- timeandspace11
- Posts: 605
- Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2012 11:16 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
December LSAT takers down 15.6% from last year. If you really want to go to UCLA and are on the waitlist I would not give up. I have a feeling moving students off of waitlists is where we will really see the effects of reduced applicants and applications.
- hhockberger
- Posts: 174
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2012 3:28 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Bless youtimeandspace11 wrote:December LSAT takers down 15.6% from last year. If you really want to go to UCLA and are on the waitlist I would not give up. I have a feeling moving students off of waitlists is where we will really see the effects of reduced applicants and applications.
-
- Posts: 381
- Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2012 6:34 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
where did you get this stat on Dec LSAT from?timeandspace11 wrote:December LSAT takers down 15.6% from last year. If you really want to go to UCLA and are on the waitlist I would not give up. I have a feeling moving students off of waitlists is where we will really see the effects of reduced applicants and applications.
- timeandspace11
- Posts: 605
- Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2012 11:16 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
http://www.lsac.org/lsacresources/data/ ... stered.aspcurious66 wrote:where did you get this stat on Dec LSAT from?timeandspace11 wrote:December LSAT takers down 15.6% from last year. If you really want to go to UCLA and are on the waitlist I would not give up. I have a feeling moving students off of waitlists is where we will really see the effects of reduced applicants and applications.
- harveyfan
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:36 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Just got the call! I'm in! Applied early November. 169/3.83 (now 3.88). Wrote the programmatic contribution essay but no other Why UCLA.
- moneyball026
- Posts: 208
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 10:07 am
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Just got the call! In!!!!! Really excited right now. numbers in profile, applied late nov....was beginning to lose hope with all the wl's.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 245
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 1:53 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Congratulations to both of you. May many more of us receive these calls today!
- twinkletoes16
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Got the call! So excited, my first phone call (: no mention of $ though...do they always mention $ in that phone call or am I totally SOL?
Edit- I think I'm getting no money based on this thread. Damn. Should I show them scholarships once I get some? UCLA is somewhere I would really like to be but I can't do it at sticker.
Edit- I think I'm getting no money based on this thread. Damn. Should I show them scholarships once I get some? UCLA is somewhere I would really like to be but I can't do it at sticker.
Last edited by twinkletoes16 on Wed Jan 09, 2013 5:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- ccook32691
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 3:43 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
When I got the call they told me about money right off the bat.. But I'm not sure if that is the usual practice or not...twinkletoes16 wrote:Got the call! So excited, my first phone call (: no mention of $ though...do they always mention $ in that phone call or am I totally SOL?
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Same for me. Twinkle might be one of those left hanging because there is a 0% chance she will actually attend. Or he just forgot to mention it.ccook32691 wrote:When I got the call they told me about money right off the bat.. But I'm not sure if that is the usual practice or not...twinkletoes16 wrote:Got the call! So excited, my first phone call (: no mention of $ though...do they always mention $ in that phone call or am I totally SOL?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- twinkletoes16
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
ccook32691 wrote:When I got the call they told me about money right off the bat.. But I'm not sure if that is the usual practice or not...twinkletoes16 wrote:Got the call! So excited, my first phone call (: no mention of $ though...do they always mention $ in that phone call or am I totally SOL?
Now I am really sad.
- timeandspace11
- Posts: 605
- Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2012 11:16 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Many people on hear said they recevied money off the bat. I wouldnt say you are SOL though. There is still plenty of time for negotiation.twinkletoes16 wrote:Got the call! So excited, my first phone call (: no mention of $ though...do they always mention $ in that phone call or am I totally SOL?
- twinkletoes16
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
BigZuck wrote:Same for me. Twinkle might be one of those left hanging because there is a 0% chance she will actually attend. Or he just forgot to mention it.ccook32691 wrote:When I got the call they told me about money right off the bat.. But I'm not sure if that is the usual practice or not...twinkletoes16 wrote:Got the call! So excited, my first phone call (: no mention of $ though...do they always mention $ in that phone call or am I totally SOL?
But I would attend, definitely. If berk stiffs me on $ i would happily go to USC or UCLA with $$$. That makes the most sense since I want to practice in CA, right?
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Enjoy Harvard.twinkletoes16 wrote:BigZuck wrote:Same for me. Twinkle might be one of those left hanging because there is a 0% chance she will actually attend. Or he just forgot to mention it.ccook32691 wrote:When I got the call they told me about money right off the bat.. But I'm not sure if that is the usual practice or not...twinkletoes16 wrote:Got the call! So excited, my first phone call (: no mention of $ though...do they always mention $ in that phone call or am I totally SOL?
But I would attend, definitely. If berk stiffs me on $ i would happily go to USC or UCLA with $$$. That makes the most sense since I want to practice in CA, right?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- 06102016
- Posts: 13460
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 1:29 pm
- poichi
- Posts: 103
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 11:31 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
This too. But UCLA seem like a school that, once they have decided they want you, want to make sure they get you, if money is the only thing holding you back. Definitely let them know you would attend if the price was right, and that you can't justify turning down Berkeley et al with zero monies from UCLA. 95% confident that you could talk them into a full ride further into the cycle with your numbers if you really want to go.BigZuck wrote:Enjoy Harvard.
- twinkletoes16
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
BigZuck wrote: Enjoy Harvard.
With my GPA? I wish. I'm optimistic, not delusional.
Last edited by twinkletoes16 on Wed Jan 09, 2013 7:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- twinkletoes16
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
It's not a guarantee, and lots of people submitted their matching scholarships and got nothing at all from Berk. It sounds fairly common.slack_academic wrote:
I'd take Berkeley over USC/UCLA for Los Angeles. Also confused about Berkeley stiffing you when they match scholarships from all T14 schools except NU.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login