Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
-
- Posts: 2578
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:33 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Hey Chi-town thread. Care if I chill with you guys for a while? Hows everyone's cycle going?
- lsacqueen
- Posts: 255
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2011 4:03 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I emailed Ann Perry a few days ago, and she said they had just started reviewing financial aid info.WhiteyCakes wrote:admitted student site says early march.RSterling wrote:Has anyone in the first wave of acceptance heard of anything money-wise? The e-mail we received said that offers would start going out at the end of Feb.
- UtilityMonster
- Posts: 315
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 3:16 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
My conception of what is fun is so different than the traditional one of parties, blasting music, intoxication, etc., that Chicago sounds like a lot of fun to me.robot_socrates wrote:
Let's not forget that UChicago is where "fun comes to die."
-
- Posts: 293
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 10:21 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
+1UtilityMonster wrote:My conception of what is fun is so different than the traditional one of parties, blasting music, intoxication, etc., that Chicago sounds like a lot of fun to me.robot_socrates wrote:
Let's not forget that UChicago is where "fun comes to die."
- banjo
- Posts: 1351
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 8:00 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
It was a joke. I was playfully implying that Chicago students might not have as many "fun" options on a Friday night (in reality, I'm sure they do).talesofyore wrote:How is it lame to take advantage of opportunities to learn?banjo wrote:Last year I think Paul Campos posted that Chicago was still willing to receive applicantions in July or something. They start a month later than everyone else, so I think that urgency is just not there.
Oh I had to add this gem from the TLS profile:
This visiting professor from NYU was literally incredulous at how lame Chicago students are.Brian Leiter wrote:A friend of mine from NYU’s faculty came to a conference here and participated in a Friday evening session of the conference and it wasn’t like it was a Supreme Court justice, it was a bunch of law professors on a Friday evening, and there were about a hundred and fifty students and he couldn’t believe it. He said this wouldn’t happen at NYU — there are more distractions.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Crowing
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Meh, drunk board game/video game nights, anyone?banjo wrote:It was a joke. I was playfully implying that Chicago students might not have as many "fun" options on a Friday night (in reality, I'm sure they do).talesofyore wrote:How is it lame to take advantage of opportunities to learn?banjo wrote:Last year I think Paul Campos posted that Chicago was still willing to receive applicantions in July or something. They start a month later than everyone else, so I think that urgency is just not there.
Oh I had to add this gem from the TLS profile:
This visiting professor from NYU was literally incredulous at how lame Chicago students are.Brian Leiter wrote:A friend of mine from NYU’s faculty came to a conference here and participated in a Friday evening session of the conference and it wasn’t like it was a Supreme Court justice, it was a bunch of law professors on a Friday evening, and there were about a hundred and fifty students and he couldn’t believe it. He said this wouldn’t happen at NYU — there are more distractions.
I don't need no book learnin'.
- Emma.
- Posts: 2408
- Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 7:57 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
TBF, I don't think all the students were hanging around on a Friday evening just for the law professors' scintillating conversation.banjo wrote:It was a joke. I was playfully implying that Chicago students might not have as many "fun" options on a Friday night (in reality, I'm sure they do).talesofyore wrote:How is it lame to take advantage of opportunities to learn?banjo wrote:Last year I think Paul Campos posted that Chicago was still willing to receive applicantions in July or something. They start a month later than everyone else, so I think that urgency is just not there.
Oh I had to add this gem from the TLS profile:
This visiting professor from NYU was literally incredulous at how lame Chicago students are.Brian Leiter wrote:A friend of mine from NYU’s faculty came to a conference here and participated in a Friday evening session of the conference and it wasn’t like it was a Supreme Court justice, it was a bunch of law professors on a Friday evening, and there were about a hundred and fifty students and he couldn’t believe it. He said this wouldn’t happen at NYU — there are more distractions.
There's free beer at school on Fridays.
-
- Posts: 293
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 10:21 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
banjo wrote:It was a joke. I was playfully implying that Chicago students might not have as many "fun" options on a Friday night (in reality, I'm sure they do).talesofyore wrote:How is it lame to take advantage of opportunities to learn?banjo wrote:Last year I think Paul Campos posted that Chicago was still willing to receive applicantions in July or something. They start a month later than everyone else, so I think that urgency is just not there.
Oh I had to add this gem from the TLS profile:
This visiting professor from NYU was literally incredulous at how lame Chicago students are.Brian Leiter wrote:A friend of mine from NYU’s faculty came to a conference here and participated in a Friday evening session of the conference and it wasn’t like it was a Supreme Court justice, it was a bunch of law professors on a Friday evening, and there were about a hundred and fifty students and he couldn’t believe it. He said this wouldn’t happen at NYU — there are more distractions.
Ooops. Number one problem with online communication: people ascribe tones of voice to sentences (often wrongly). Sorry!
- Jaqen
- Posts: 986
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 6:23 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Hell yeah.Crowing wrote:Meh, drunk board game/video game nights, anyone?
I don't need no book learnin'.
-
- Posts: 3070
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by 20141023 on Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Lavitz
- Posts: 3402
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
We're all in the Columbia thread.Regulus wrote:Any other SSB players out there?Jaqen wrote:Hell yeah.Crowing wrote:Meh, drunk board game/video game nights, anyone?
I don't need no book learnin'.
-
- Posts: 3070
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by 20141023 on Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Smumps
- Posts: 332
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 1:37 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
my roommate maintains he is the best SSB player of all time. if you beat him at ASW, I'll give you all my notes/outlines from this year.Regulus wrote:Any other SSB players out there?Jaqen wrote:Hell yeah.Crowing wrote:Meh, drunk board game/video game nights, anyone?
I don't need no book learnin'.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 3070
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by 20141023 on Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- TexasAggie13
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 4:42 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Are we talking N64, GameCube, or Wii?
- banjo
- Posts: 1351
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 8:00 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Yes definitely. However, like TexasAggie13, I will need to know N64/GCN/Wii so I can start my 0L prep.Crowing wrote: Meh, drunk board game/video game nights, anyone?
I don't need no book learnin'.
-
- Posts: 3070
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by 20141023 on Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2013 11:11 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by mambar on Thu Jun 01, 2017 12:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Crowing
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I'll play. I was never that good among my friends but that's because I have a few who were actually tourny players and do all the wavedashing and fancy moves and shit lol.Regulus wrote:Any other SSB players out there?Jaqen wrote:Hell yeah.Crowing wrote:Meh, drunk board game/video game nights, anyone?
I don't need no book learnin'.
I have a hard enough time just being able to selectively choose between tilts and smashes!
- postard
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 7:39 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Had my interview today, I think it went okay.
Good luck to the rest waiting on interviews!
Good luck to the rest waiting on interviews!
-
- Posts: 341
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 12:26 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Congrats, man. Feels good to get that behind you.postard wrote:Had my interview today, I think it went okay.
Good luck to the rest waiting on interviews!
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Inconceivable!
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 7:35 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
So where we are we at for complete --> under review dates? I am complete at 12/21, and still no under review.
-
- Posts: 60
- Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2013 8:28 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Where are we now? Depends on which thread you are in. Chicago and Yale still stuck in 2012.
IT'S 2013 GET WITH THE TIMES CHICAGO AND YALE.
IT'S 2013 GET WITH THE TIMES CHICAGO AND YALE.
- TexasAggie13
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 4:42 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Not gonna lie, getting pumped for ASW.Crowing wrote:I'll play. I was never that good among my friends but that's because I have a few who were actually tourny players and do all the wavedashing and fancy moves and shit lol.Regulus wrote:Any other SSB players out there?Jaqen wrote:Hell yeah.Crowing wrote:Meh, drunk board game/video game nights, anyone?
I don't need no book learnin'.
I have a hard enough time just being able to selectively choose between tilts and smashes!
-
- Posts: 222
- Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2010 8:58 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Went UR1 this evening. Submitted 12/8 and went complete 12/20.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login