UtilityMonster wrote:Lol, check out their ASW RSVP page - this is hilarious:
Uhhh, I'll take a lovely lady, and, uh, don't worry about me - I'll keep myself occupied.Gender preference for overnight host: *
Female
Male
No preference
I would prefer the following activity outside of the scheduled ASW programming: *
I would prefer to go out and socialize.
I would prefer to watch a movie or stay in for the evening.
I'm flexible and will go with the flow.
Don't worry about me; I plan to keep myself occupied.
Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
- VeeD101
- Posts: 333
- Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 9:49 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
- robot_socrates
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 9:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Got my invite to interview! November applicant, initial UR 1/9.
- LSATSCORES2012
- Posts: 770
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 2:12 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Got an interview invite! Complete 11/2, UR 1/3, submitted early Sept (they were waiting for Oct. LSAT), 170/3.86.
For those who also got invites, please fill out
For those who also got invites, please fill out
- trojandave
- Posts: 389
- Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2012 5:25 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
You sir, win the ASW award and are awarded a Ruby. On the flip side, I bet if you check "I would prefer to watch a movie or stay in for the evening" they revoke your acceptance.UtilityMonster wrote:Lol, check out their ASW RSVP page - this is hilarious:
Uhhh, I'll take a lovely lady, and, uh, don't worry about me - I'll keep myself occupied.Gender preference for overnight host: *
Female
Male
No preference
I would prefer the following activity outside of the scheduled ASW programming: *
I would prefer to go out and socialize.
I would prefer to watch a movie or stay in for the evening.
I'm flexible and will go with the flow.
Don't worry about me; I plan to keep myself occupied.
- 02889
- Posts: 479
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 12:21 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I just got an interview invite! Complete 11/1, UR 1/3. I thought I was either auto-ding or at best auto-WL given that I have no high LSAT to counter my meh GPA. Chicago was such an unlikely possibility that I haven't even researched the school at all. Guess I'll have to start!
Congrats to everyone who's been admitted so far. And for those who were rejected or waitlisted, I expect to be joining you very soon.
Congrats to everyone who's been admitted so far. And for those who were rejected or waitlisted, I expect to be joining you very soon.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Yukos
- Posts: 1774
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:47 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I think that would just mean you're going to fit in perfectly at UChitrojandave wrote: On the flip side, I bet if you check "I would prefer to watch a movie or stay in for the evening" they revoke your acceptance.
-
- Posts: 3070
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by 20141023 on Mon Feb 16, 2015 3:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- twinkletoes16
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Regulus wrote:Yukos, that wasn't nice and it wasn't funny. At the University of Chicago, we neither watch movies nor stay in our homes. Instead, we go to the library where we can actively engage in rigorous, solitary scholarship. Please do not ever make the mistake of associating us with "movies" or "lives at home" again because it is really damaging to our image.Yukos wrote:I think that would just mean you're going to fit in perfectly at UChitrojandave wrote: On the flip side, I bet if you check "I would prefer to watch a movie or stay in for the evening" they revoke your acceptance.
ahahahahaha
- Yukos
- Posts: 1774
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:47 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
180.Regulus wrote:Yukos, that wasn't nice and it wasn't funny. At the University of Chicago, we neither watch movies nor stay in our homes. Instead, we go to the library where we can actively engage in rigorous, solitary scholarship. Please do not ever make the mistake of associating us with "movies" or "lives at home" again because it is really damaging to our image.Yukos wrote:I think that would just mean you're going to fit in perfectly at UChitrojandave wrote: On the flip side, I bet if you check "I would prefer to watch a movie or stay in for the evening" they revoke your acceptance.
- broadstreet11
- Posts: 175
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 7:34 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Interview request. Complete since November. Updated LSAT 1/3. I imagine the LSAT just got me thrown into a different pile.
- twinkletoes16
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
seems like they're going in chronologicalish order- no dec/jan people invited to interview yet.
- efresh88
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2012 8:19 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Invite to interview today 3.87/165 URM MA, dates below
Complete: 11/8
Under Review: 1/9
Complete: 11/8
Under Review: 1/9
-
- Posts: 180
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2013 7:13 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Is now a good time for 1/9 UR's to conclude that they will not be receiving interview invites? Or are they going out on a rolling basis? I never understand why they don't just do these things all at once.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 222
- Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2010 8:58 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Checking in. 4.04/172, non-traditional student. Chicago is one of my very top choices as it is close to my current home (Indianapolis), I have family in the area, and there are excellent opportunities for my wife in her line of work there.
Submitted 12/8/12
Complete 12/19/12
Nothing since...
Submitted 12/8/12
Complete 12/19/12
Nothing since...
- Crowing
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Why is "I would prefer to immerse myself in rigorous intellectual discovery" not an option? I thought I was going to Chicago, not casualville.UtilityMonster wrote:Lol, check out their ASW RSVP page - this is hilarious:
Uhhh, I'll take a lovely lady, and, uh, don't worry about me - I'll keep myself occupied.Gender preference for overnight host: *
Female
Male
No preference
I would prefer the following activity outside of the scheduled ASW programming: *
I would prefer to go out and socialize.
I would prefer to watch a movie or stay in for the evening.
I'm flexible and will go with the flow.
Don't worry about me; I plan to keep myself occupied.
- LSATSCORES2012
- Posts: 770
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 2:12 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Sooooo... I don't own a suit. But looks like everyone suggests wearing a suit. I'm a K-JD, so I kinda want to look not immature. I'm also fat, so I want to avoid looking like a slob.
I'm thinking I should go get fitted for a suit...
I'm thinking I should go get fitted for a suit...
- cwid1391
- Posts: 475
- Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 10:41 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Sooner rather than later. It can take a couple weeks to get a suit back from most places. Though, if you have a sport coat, you could just wear a dress shirt and tie (it doesn't matter about your lower half) and they'd be none the wiser.LSATSCORES2012 wrote:Sooooo... I don't own a suit. But looks like everyone suggests wearing a suit. I'm a K-JD, so I kinda want to look not immature. I'm also fat, so I want to avoid looking like a slob.
I'm thinking I should go get fitted for a suit...
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 3070
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by 20141023 on Mon Feb 16, 2015 3:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- applemaroon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by applemaroon on Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 475
- Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 5:05 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Agree that you should definitely get one. However, if you've never worn a suit before, and you feel as though you won't be comfortable in it the first couple times, I wouldn't wear it to an interview. As long as you have on a collared shirt, black shoes, and no jeans, you shouldn't be negatively judged. On the converse, if you wear a suit and feel uncomfortable, that discomfort will show through in your body language possibly to your detriment.cwid1391 wrote:Sooner rather than later. It can take a couple weeks to get a suit back from most places. Though, if you have a sport coat, you could just wear a dress shirt and tie (it doesn't matter about your lower half) and they'd be none the wiser.LSATSCORES2012 wrote:Sooooo... I don't own a suit. But looks like everyone suggests wearing a suit. I'm a K-JD, so I kinda want to look not immature. I'm also fat, so I want to avoid looking like a slob.
I'm thinking I should go get fitted for a suit...
- twinkletoes16
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
nba101790 wrote:Agree that you should definitely get one. However, if you've never worn a suit before, and you feel as though you won't be comfortable in it the first couple times, I wouldn't wear it to an interview. As long as you have on a collared shirt, black shoes, and no jeans, you shouldn't be negatively judged. On the converse, if you wear a suit and feel uncomfortable, that discomfort will show through in your body language possibly to your detriment.cwid1391 wrote:Sooner rather than later. It can take a couple weeks to get a suit back from most places. Though, if you have a sport coat, you could just wear a dress shirt and tie (it doesn't matter about your lower half) and they'd be none the wiser.LSATSCORES2012 wrote:Sooooo... I don't own a suit. But looks like everyone suggests wearing a suit. I'm a K-JD, so I kinda want to look not immature. I'm also fat, so I want to avoid looking like a slob.
I'm thinking I should go get fitted for a suit...
It's a skype interview, so as long as he has a collared shirt and a sport coat on he would be fine. He could wear boxers and Crocs along with it for ultimate comfort and Chicago would have no idea. If you can't afford one right now, save up- don't rush an investment piece. you'll need one before 1L starts, certainly, but it takes time for fittings and all that.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- ajclark1992
- Posts: 103
- Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 7:21 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I wore a button down, collared shirt and a nice wool sweater. I think you'll be fine as long as you look professional
Edit: I am also fat.
Edit: I am also fat.
- LSATSCORES2012
- Posts: 770
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 2:12 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Thank you so much for the input everyone! I'll see what I can find tonight/tomorrow and go from there.
- reallysearch
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2012 1:57 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I actually dressed the full set since I was afraid they might ask me to stand up and walk around in front of the web cam.... Of course that is totally unwarranted, but you know, application panic...twinkletoes16 wrote:nba101790 wrote:Agree that you should definitely get one. However, if you've never worn a suit before, and you feel as though you won't be comfortable in it the first couple times, I wouldn't wear it to an interview. As long as you have on a collared shirt, black shoes, and no jeans, you shouldn't be negatively judged. On the converse, if you wear a suit and feel uncomfortable, that discomfort will show through in your body language possibly to your detriment.cwid1391 wrote:Sooner rather than later. It can take a couple weeks to get a suit back from most places. Though, if you have a sport coat, you could just wear a dress shirt and tie (it doesn't matter about your lower half) and they'd be none the wiser.LSATSCORES2012 wrote:Sooooo... I don't own a suit. But looks like everyone suggests wearing a suit. I'm a K-JD, so I kinda want to look not immature. I'm also fat, so I want to avoid looking like a slob.
I'm thinking I should go get fitted for a suit...
It's a skype interview, so as long as he has a collared shirt and a sport coat on he would be fine. He could wear boxers and Crocs along with it for ultimate comfort and Chicago would have no idea. If you can't afford one right now, save up- don't rush an investment piece. you'll need one before 1L starts, certainly, but it takes time for fittings and all that.
- Crowing
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I did too but it was because I would feel weird being like half suited up.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login