Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
-
- Posts: 2388
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 2:21 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Not sure of all my UR dates but I submited 1/8ish had a ur on 4/23 and now I'm at 5/6.
I'm expecting a WL/Ding - how about the rest of ya'll ?
I'm expecting a WL/Ding - how about the rest of ya'll ?
-
- Posts: 336
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 5:15 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
UR1 4/19
UR2 4/26
UR3 5/6
Not sure what to expect as a Jan submit
UR2 4/26
UR3 5/6
Not sure what to expect as a Jan submit
- JXander
- Posts: 966
- Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 10:23 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I am hoping they will also update us via Twitter.
-
- Posts: 336
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 5:15 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
That would be awesome, nice big batch of Monday decisions. Does anyone know how UR3 correlates with decision timing?JXander wrote:I am hoping they will also update us via Twitter.
-
- Posts: 12612
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
UR 3 almost always means a decision today. I got my email at 5:37pm CST FWIW. I'd expect decisions late tonight. Good luck everyone.FlowBro wrote:That would be awesome, nice big batch of Monday decisions. Does anyone know how UR3 correlates with decision timing?JXander wrote:I am hoping they will also update us via Twitter.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Decisions do come out late, don't expect much before 5PM CST.
If Chicago has an admit wave today, they will over-enroll. This will be interesting. Good luck all
If Chicago has an admit wave today, they will over-enroll. This will be interesting. Good luck all
-
- Posts: 12612
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
How could you possibly know that.jbagelboy wrote:Decisions do come out late, don't expect much before 5PM CST.
If Chicago has an admit wave today, they will over-enroll. This will be interesting. Good luck all
- Lavitz
- Posts: 3402
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
jbagelboy wrote:If Chicago has an admit wave today, they will over-enroll.
I fail to see how that logically follows. They know how many seats they have. They could easily choose to just only accept enough people to fill the remaining seats. Then they could turn to the WL if any of them choose to not attend.
-
- Posts: 2388
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 2:21 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
outed as a uchi dean of adminjbagelboy wrote:Decisions do come out late, don't expect much before 5PM CST.
If Chicago has an admit wave today, they will over-enroll. This will be interesting. Good luck all
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Lavitz wrote:jbagelboy wrote:If Chicago has an admit wave today, they will over-enroll.
I fail to see how that logically follows. They know how many seats they have. They could easily choose to just only accept enough people to fill the remaining seats. Then they could turn to the WL if any of them choose to not attend.
Okay, you're both right, of course they could have calculated a few admits in to the class. The only reasonable data we have (LSN) tells that the yield is already higher than last year prior to today's decisions (count attending 12-13 vs 11-12); thus, it follows they could most likely fill a class already. Chicago would not admit students at this juncture who they felt wouldn't attend, since that would unnecessarily hurt their admit and yield %.. if they admit a wave of students who would attend, they could easily overenroll.Mal Reynolds wrote:How could you possibly know that.jbagelboy wrote:Decisions do come out late, don't expect much before 5PM CST.
If Chicago has an admit wave today, they will over-enroll. This will be interesting. Good luck all
-
- Posts: 12612
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Or LSN gets more popular every year so it's impossible to use it as an accurate measure of actual enrollment.
-
- Posts: 12612
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Also fucking lol at a two person difference being significant.
-
- Posts: 538
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 4:06 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Do they always admit in waves? Is it ever a mixed bag of admits, WLs and dings?jbagelboy wrote:Lavitz wrote:jbagelboy wrote:If Chicago has an admit wave today, they will over-enroll.
I fail to see how that logically follows. They know how many seats they have. They could easily choose to just only accept enough people to fill the remaining seats. Then they could turn to the WL if any of them choose to not attend.Okay, you're both right, of course they could have calculated a few admits in to the class. The only reasonable data we have (LSN) tells that the yield is already higher than last year prior to today's decisions (count attending 12-13 vs 11-12); thus, it follows they could most likely fill a class already. Chicago would not admit students at this juncture who they felt wouldn't attend, since that would unnecessarily hurt their admit and yield %.. if they admit a wave of students who would attend, they could easily overenroll.Mal Reynolds wrote:How could you possibly know that.jbagelboy wrote:Decisions do come out late, don't expect much before 5PM CST.
If Chicago has an admit wave today, they will over-enroll. This will be interesting. Good luck all
Lastly, I'm assuming that every person (admit or ding) goes UR3 at some point or another. Is this true?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 12612
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
They always do a wave of admits, wait lists, and dings. You'll likely go UR 3 at some point. Don't really know if they break protocol this late in the game but I'd expect you to be UR 3 before you get a decision.
-
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 4:06 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Can you be admitted without an interview at this point?
- Lavitz
- Posts: 3402
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Yes.Goodman wrote:Can you be admitted without an interview at this point?
I believe most of the people admitted recently have gotten in without interviews. They may have actually stopped doing interviews at this point.
-
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Thu Apr 18, 2013 2:09 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I'm also under review as of today. Anyone know whether we should expect decisions today based on past cycles?JXander wrote:UR1, 4/17; UR2 4/26; UR3 5/6.
Is the decision typically made on the day of the third UR?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 12612
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Can you not read five posts up?atomist wrote:I'm also under review as of today. Anyone know whether we should expect decisions today based on past cycles?JXander wrote:UR1, 4/17; UR2 4/26; UR3 5/6.
Is the decision typically made on the day of the third UR?
-
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Thu Apr 18, 2013 2:09 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Your, et al's posts that we should expect letters today? I'm interested in actual data from previous cycles.Mal Reynolds wrote:Can you not read five posts up?atomist wrote:I'm also under review as of today. Anyone know whether we should expect decisions today based on past cycles?JXander wrote:UR1, 4/17; UR2 4/26; UR3 5/6.
Is the decision typically made on the day of the third UR?
-
- Posts: 12612
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
What the hell are you talking about? There is actual data from this cycle and last cycle. Everyone goes UR3 and then receives a decision. What else are you looking for. It could be different but that's the only data you're gonna get.
- jvincent11
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 1:38 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
UR3 also. Something tells me this wave isn't good...
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Micdiddy
- Posts: 2231
- Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2012 3:38 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
UR3. After they deny me I can finally tack on that 1% for when I tell people "I am 99% going to northwestern."
- JXander
- Posts: 966
- Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 10:23 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Yeah. Super nervous.jvincent11 wrote:UR3 also. Something tells me this wave isn't good...
-
- Posts: 336
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 5:15 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Now past the 5 o'clock hour...
-
- Posts: 475
- Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 5:05 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
So, anyone hear today?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login