Top Law Schools

"Congratulations again on your admission to ****! In recognition of your fine academic record and accomplishments, I write to offer your $75000.00 Faculty Fellowship. This grant is renewable each year provided that you remain in good standing. To accept this award, please pay both tuition deposits by the deadlines discussed in your admission letter"



Does this mean 75000/year? Or 75/three years?

$75,000 total. No law school has a $225,000 scholarship.

yea but thats not what the plain english states. and I know a couple students from this school that got that too. its private and im in the top of the admitted class

I mean I dont know why I tried to justify your response. You're probably right. its too good to be true otherwise.

lookingformoney wrote:I mean I dont know why I tried to justify your response. You're probably right. its too good to be true otherwise.

Yeah.They would've thrown in something about a living stipend if it was 75k a year. Because that deal is so sweet, you bet your ass they would've emphasized it was 'per year' if it was.

Plain meaning can also be read to say that its 75k total, pending you don't screw it up. If you screw it up, you lose whatever moneys you have left of the 75k (only renewable if your'e in good standing).

yea ok thanks i see you're right

i was so psyched. talk about being purposefully cryptic

lookingformoney wrote:i was so psyched. talk about being purposefully cryptic

Yeah, this is all speculation. I would 100% call and double check as soon as possible. If we're wrong, it'd be a pretty bad thing to blow cuz of our less-than-perfect offer interpretation skills.

do you think mayyyyyybe we're wrong?

lookingformoney wrote:do you think mayyyyyybe we're wrong?

hmmmm more thoughts on this

francesolaw wrote:hmmmm more thoughts on this

no. OP needs to call and report back.

im pretty sure its over 3 years. 75 is too much.

now on the other hand, if it said "25K", then I wouldnt think it was over the three years. i think the letter is purposefully confusing.

lookingformoney wrote:im pretty sure its over 3 years. 75 is too much.

now on the other hand, if it said "25K", then I wouldnt think it was over the three years. i think the letter is purposefully confusing.

make sure you update after you call. people will want to know.

yes i will. if its true, i'll give everyone a dollar

lookingformoney wrote:i think the letter is purposefully confusing.

Maybe they think nobody is stupid enough to think they've just been awarded a scholarship that's over tuition by $30,000/year.

i didnt think that, but the writing seemed confusing. I thought I'd check to see if others agreed with me that it was confusing and somewhat misleading.

lookingformoney wrote:i didnt think that, but the writing seemed confusing. I thought I'd check to see if others agreed with me that it was confusing and somewhat misleading.

I don't find it confusing or misleading at all.

good to know. i've asked 5-6 people and it went both ways. also, i know an individual at the school that got around the same too for being top of the admitted class.

Bildungsroman wrote:

lookingformoney wrote:i didnt think that, but the writing seemed confusing. I thought I'd check to see if others agreed with me that it was confusing and somewhat misleading.

I don't find it confusing or misleading at all.

Good for you. But if we're working under the assumption that "this grant" refers to the "$75000 Fellowship," grammatically speaking it means that 75k is renewable on a yearly basis. I don't think they're offering 75k a year, but the fact of the matter is that the offer was indeed poorly worded.

kaveman wrote:

Bildungsroman wrote:

lookingformoney wrote:i didnt think that, but the writing seemed confusing. I thought I'd check to see if others agreed with me that it was confusing and somewhat misleading.

I don't find it confusing or misleading at all.

Good for you. But if we're working under the assumption that "this grant" refers to the "$75000 Fellowship," grammatically speaking it means that 75k is renewable on a yearly basis.

No it doesn't.

Bildungsroman wrote:

kaveman wrote:

Bildungsroman wrote:

lookingformoney wrote:i didnt think that, but the writing seemed confusing. I thought I'd check to see if others agreed with me that it was confusing and somewhat misleading.

I don't find it confusing or misleading at all.

Good for you. But if we're working under the assumption that "this grant" refers to the "$75000 Fellowship," grammatically speaking it means that 75k is renewable on a yearly basis.

No it doesn't.

"This" is a pronoun; a pronoun must refer to (replace) a specific noun; we can only replace "this" with the "$75000 Fellowship." I look forward to your next substantive argument, something along the lines of, "No."

kaveman wrote:"This" is a pronoun; a pronoun must refer to (replace) a specific noun; we can only replace "this" with the "$75000 Fellowship." I look forward to your next substantive argument, something along the lines of, "No."

You're wrong.

InGoodFaith wrote:

kaveman wrote:"This" is a pronoun; a pronoun must refer to (replace) a specific noun; we can only replace "this" with the "$75000 Fellowship." I look forward to your next substantive argument, something along the lines of, "No."

You're wrong.

Maybe I am. But until one of you explains why, I'll just assume you don't know what the hell you're talking about.

InGoodFaith wrote:

kaveman wrote:"This" is a pronoun; a pronoun must refer to (replace) a specific noun; we can only replace "this" with the "$75000 Fellowship." I look forward to your next substantive argument, something along the lines of, "No."

You're wrong.

He really isn't. The statement almost surely means 75K total, but the wording could be phrased in a more clear manner. It's not hard to imagine that people would misunderstand it to mean 75k per year.