Page 1 of 2
Hawaii 2011 Applicants
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 12:35 pm
by Mountain Madness
Anyone out there trying to get into Richardson?
I sent in everything in Sept. and wondering how long they take to get out letters?
Re: Hawaii 2011 Applicants
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2010 4:07 pm
by mrwarre85
I applied a few weeks ago. Haven't heard anything.
Too bad I didn't get a fee waiver that really hurt. Anyone know anything about the area the LS is in?
2.9/164 by the way.
Re: Hawaii 2011 Applicants
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2010 4:19 pm
by dowon
Richardson is in Manoa, which is like a suburb of Honolulu (~15 min from downtown). It's about 10 min from Waikiki. Most people are residents though and commute to school, so they don't necessarily live in the Honolulu area. The law school is literally across the street from the main campus; the building is 2 stories and the classrooms are pretty decent. It's not exactly an exciting college town but has decent ethnic restaurants nearby (but so do most areas in Hawaii since the local population is predominantly Asian/Pacific Islander).
Re: Hawaii 2011 Applicants
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2010 9:02 pm
by berkeleyman
Does anyone know what kind of numbers an out-of-stater from say, CA, would need for Richardson? Im assuming its considerably higher than the school's medians.
Re: Hawaii 2011 Applicants
Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 3:16 am
by Mountain Madness
I guessing that is the case. They only accepted 23% non-res last year.
I am hoping my chipper personality and stellar non trad. resume makes up for my 154/3.88 ughh...
Guess we'll find out sometime soon. But it is my top choice, I'd take Hawaii over any other school for location alone. Of course this is coming from a guy that skis 50+ days a year and doesn't miss a class.
Re: Hawaii 2011 Applicants
Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 11:38 am
by mrwarre85
wonder if they would prefer a above 75 median LSAT or GPA. I heard they put a lot of people on the waitlist from OOS but if you write a good why hawaii letter you can get off.
Re: Hawaii 2011 Applicants
Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 5:22 am
by jeremydc
Hawaii isn't all that great guys. With the high cost of living and weak economy/low median salary Hawaii sucks. I lived here all my life, I love the beaches and what Hawaii has to offer but its like any other tourist attraction; you get sick of it after a while.
Re: Hawaii 2011 Applicants
Posted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 8:06 pm
by insegnilo
Applying as a total mainlander from a great school with a 157 and a 3.62 - thoughts? App was complete just this Friday (letter of rec. that just took forever to wrangle in!)
Re: Hawaii 2011 Applicants
Posted: Wed Dec 22, 2010 4:56 pm
by mrwarre85
insegnilo wrote:Applying as a total mainlander from a great school with a 157 and a 3.62 - thoughts? App was complete just this Friday (letter of rec. that just took forever to wrangle in!)
I don't know... I've got a higher LSAT and a lower GPA and am really hoping for an admit. I think its pretty rough if you don't have ties to the islands.
Did you submit a why hawaii? I tried to talk about environmental law and wanting to stay on the islands, but I think its a tough sell.
Re: Hawaii 2011 Applicants
Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2010 4:35 pm
by shoteka
Got into Hawaii last night via phone call. Anyone else?
Re: Hawaii 2011 Applicants
Posted: Mon Dec 27, 2010 2:34 pm
by mrwarre85
shoteka wrote:Got into Hawaii last night via phone call. Anyone else?
thats awesome. what do you think got you in? when did you apply?
Re: Hawaii 2011 Applicants
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 9:46 pm
by letshula1987
i'm in at hawaii as out of state (CA), and i'm considering it very seriously as i'm interested in environmental/energy law. i'm trying to weigh the benefits and cons between hawaii and USD. i have zero interest in going to a firm after law grad, and want a government gig, either at the EPA or a state commission. here are my thoughts going in, any feedback is appreciated:
-CA has an indefinite government hiring freeze and an already saturated legal market. all the firm jobs will be eaten up by CA schools with better rankings, most likely, and what is left of government jobs will be taken by the top few from the smaller schools. Hawaii is owned by Richardson since it's the only school there, and it does have 100% employment rate (though this number could be doubtful), and if the top of UH-M's graduating class will be looking for private employment, my chances at getting a government position are probably better. However, I have already been working as a RA for San Diego and am getting some good face time with institute directors who have connections to employment opportunities in the future. However, that is banking on a "maybe"...
-in terms of cost, I'm looking at going into government for the long haul and will try to take advantage of federal loans and repayment programs. Hawaii and San Diego, presuming no scholarship money at either, will cost roughly the same. Hawaii may even be cheaper by far if I claim residency after the first year (i have NH ancestry but since i'm CA born and bred, can't claim residency now)
-I'd like to practice either in Hawaii or California, but I like the idea of flexibility in both states. It seems harder to break into the Hawaii market from a California school than vice versa.
So, with this, it sounds like I'm favoring Hawaii, but I could totally be deluding myself!
Re: Hawaii 2011 Applicants
Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 12:46 am
by mrwarre85
letshula1987 wrote:i'm in at hawaii as out of state (CA), and i'm considering it very seriously as i'm interested in environmental/energy law. i'm trying to weigh the benefits and cons between hawaii and USD. i have zero interest in going to a firm after law grad, and want a government gig, either at the EPA or a state commission. here are my thoughts going in, any feedback is appreciated:
-CA has an indefinite government hiring freeze and an already saturated legal market. all the firm jobs will be eaten up by CA schools with better rankings, most likely, and what is left of government jobs will be taken by the top few from the smaller schools. Hawaii is owned by Richardson since it's the only school there, and it does have 100% employment rate (though this number could be doubtful), and if the top of UH-M's graduating class will be looking for private employment, my chances at getting a government position are probably better. However, I have already been working as a RA for San Diego and am getting some good face time with institute directors who have connections to employment opportunities in the future. However, that is banking on a "maybe"...
-in terms of cost, I'm looking at going into government for the long haul and will try to take advantage of federal loans and repayment programs. Hawaii and San Diego, presuming no scholarship money at either, will cost roughly the same. Hawaii may even be cheaper by far if I claim residency after the first year (i have NH ancestry but since i'm CA born and bred, can't claim residency now)
-I'd like to practice either in Hawaii or California, but I like the idea of flexibility in both states. It seems harder to break into the Hawaii market from a California school than vice versa.
So, with this, it sounds like I'm favoring Hawaii, but I could totally be deluding myself!
Same Q. Numbers? What do you think got you IN?
Re: Hawaii 2011 Applicants
Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 12:48 am
by mrwarre85
letshula1987 wrote:i'm in at hawaii as out of state (CA), and i'm considering it very seriously as i'm interested in environmental/energy law. i'm trying to weigh the benefits and cons between hawaii and USD. i have zero interest in going to a firm after law grad, and want a government gig, either at the EPA or a state commission. here are my thoughts going in, any feedback is appreciated:
-CA has an indefinite government hiring freeze and an already saturated legal market. all the firm jobs will be eaten up by CA schools with better rankings, most likely, and what is left of government jobs will be taken by the top few from the smaller schools. Hawaii is owned by Richardson since it's the only school there, and it does have 100% employment rate (though this number could be doubtful), and if the top of UH-M's graduating class will be looking for private employment, my chances at getting a government position are probably better. However, I have already been working as a RA for San Diego and am getting some good face time with institute directors who have connections to employment opportunities in the future. However, that is banking on a "maybe"...
-in terms of cost, I'm looking at going into government for the long haul and will try to take advantage of federal loans and repayment programs. Hawaii and San Diego, presuming no scholarship money at either, will cost roughly the same. Hawaii may even be cheaper by far if I claim residency after the first year (i have NH ancestry but since i'm CA born and bred, can't claim residency now)
-I'd like to practice either in Hawaii or California, but I like the idea of flexibility in both states. It seems harder to break into the Hawaii market from a California school than vice versa.
So, with this, it sounds like I'm favoring Hawaii, but I could totally be deluding myself!
PS your logic seems pretty good to me by the way. Only thing I'd mention is that Hawaii is very unique in the fact that it is very isolated; people that can handle isolation and small populations will likely enjoy Hawaii.
Re: Hawaii 2011 Applicants
Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:23 am
by toastpbj
-in terms of cost, I'm looking at going into government for the long haul and will try to take advantage of federal loans and repayment programs. Hawaii and San Diego, presuming no scholarship money at either, will cost roughly the same. Hawaii may even be cheaper by far if I claim residency after the first year (i have NH ancestry but since i'm CA born and bred, can't claim residency now)
I have NH ancestry and was mainland born and bred and was able to get in-state tuition. You just have to submit birth certificates or proof of ancestry to the registrar and they give in-state tuition rates to those of NH descent.
I've noticed that the questions that were on the application mattered... last year they asked about foreign living/travel... just so happens a good amount of my classmates lived abroad at some point. Kinda feel like those questions were more important than LSAT/GPA unless you've got great scores like 165+
Make sure Hawaii is the right choice. Location is def not everything in law school. It's a good school but other factors can really weigh heavy on whether or not you enjoy it to the fullest and can feel comfortable. Trust me, the beach (that you will only see once, maybe twice a week if you're lucky) won't make up for certain things... those things being bugs (they are everywhere), constant traffic, bad drivers, zero parking in town, suuuuper expensive COL (think NYC but slightly less). The three mile drive from my house to Ward to watch a movie, hit ala moana beach, or go shopping is a giant pain in the butt. In fact, driving anywhere is kind of a pain in the butt. If you have friends here already, or you're moving with your family... that can be totally different. Just make sure it's Hawaii is the right choice, that's the main thing.
The school and professors are definitely worthy of the top tier, but the location isn't always paradise so just keep that in mind when you're making your decision to move from the mainland. Honolulu is paradise on saturdays... when you can escape from it to the beach

Re: Hawaii 2011 Applicants
Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 8:43 pm
by piilehua
UH called today to let me know that I'm in. I'm still waiting on USD, Pepperdine & Stanford.
Re: Hawaii 2011 Applicants
Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2011 6:34 pm
by Lookingforanswers
So I applied back in September 1st and I'm still waiting, does anyone think I have a chance? I got a 146 ( both times) and 3.4 GPA but pretty solid softs, anyone have any thoughts?
Re: Hawaii 2011 Applicants
Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2011 5:57 pm
by toastpbj
Lookingforanswers wrote:So I applied back in September 1st and I'm still waiting, does anyone think I have a chance? I got a 146 ( both times) and 3.4 GPA but pretty solid softs, anyone have any thoughts?
Of course it's always hard to tell, but I'd say you have a shot (but maybe for the part-time program) if you have a connection to the Island, a diverse background, or if you've faced adversity in your life. It's always hard to tell until that phone call comes in! Good luck!
Re: Hawaii 2011 Applicants
Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2011 5:31 pm
by mrwarre85
Crickets in the hawaii thread. Anyone receive any acceptances lately? I still haven't heard a peep. Submitted early Dec. OOS 164/2.9
Did get the email a few weeks back that was from admissions. Had a minor heart attack. Realized it was a "hey Hawaii is really cool email."
Dumb.
Re: Hawaii 2011 Applicants
Posted: Mon Feb 14, 2011 4:09 pm
by kitchuel
OOS With family (military) ties to Hawaii. Complete since 1/18 still waiting to hear back as well =)
Re: Hawaii 2011 Applicants
Posted: Mon Feb 14, 2011 5:18 pm
by mrwarre85
kitchuel wrote:OOS With family (military) ties to Hawaii. Complete since 1/18 still waiting to hear back as well =)
GL. Any current UH students care to chime in about the admissions process?
Re: Hawaii 2011 Applicants
Posted: Mon Feb 14, 2011 5:20 pm
by tropicalpeach
I was complete 1/11, then it updated to 2/11, which was odd. OOS, 2.9, 167, but with strong family ties to hawaii. I wish they would let us know soon!
Re: Hawaii 2011 Applicants
Posted: Mon Feb 14, 2011 5:23 pm
by wokeemilo
i'm surprised OOS people are interested in hawaii! i'm in state and was admitted back in december. good luck!
fyi admitted students day is march 17.
Re: Hawaii 2011 Applicants
Posted: Mon Feb 14, 2011 5:26 pm
by mrwarre85
wokeemilo wrote:i'm surprised OOS people are interested in hawaii! i'm in state and was admitted back in december. good luck!
fyi admitted students day is march 17.
I bet some of us would like to know why you are surprised. Hawaii has a great rep. I'm personally looking for a place to start a life and both my fiancee and I love Hawaii.
Re: Hawaii 2011 Applicants
Posted: Mon Feb 14, 2011 7:52 pm
by Bearlegdairy
Just g