Page 1 of 2

Rejected from my "SAFETY"

Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 2:11 pm
by kittenmittons
GPA 3.6 LSAT 175
URM: White as a saltine

NAME OF SAFETY: Cornell

OPTIONAL ESSAY: No. My question 16 answer was weak too.

WHAT GOT ME REJECTED: I am bland with no softs and I can't write good.

Re: Rejected from my "SAFETY"

Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 2:11 pm
by Kiersten1985
I think you were YP'ed, sir. I wouldn't worry about it too much.

Re: Rejected from my "SAFETY"

Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 2:12 pm
by Veritas
Kiersten1985 wrote:I think you were YP'ed, sir. I wouldn't worry about it too much.
lol YP is a WL, Rejection means you suck at life.

Re: Rejected from my "SAFETY"

Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 2:15 pm
by Veritas
jayzon wrote:
Veritas wrote:
Kiersten1985 wrote:I think you were YP'ed, sir. I wouldn't worry about it too much.
lol YP is a WL, Rejection means you suck at life.
YP is usually a WL, yes...but I think Cornell looked at OP's numbers and thought the exact same thing I did: "this kid is going to C/C/N, or maybe even S."
I wuz playing along with the thread

Re: Rejected from my "SAFETY"

Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 2:18 pm
by sarlis
kittenmittons wrote: WHAT GOT ME REJECTED: I am bland with no softs and I can't write good.
i see

Re: Rejected from my "SAFETY"

Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 2:19 pm
by Kiersten1985
sarlis wrote:
kittenmittons wrote: WHAT GOT ME REJECTED: I am bland with no softs and I can't write good.
i see
I think that was intentional...

Re: Rejected from my "SAFETY"

Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 2:20 pm
by MC Southstar
kittenmittons wrote:GPA 3.6 LSAT 175
URM: White as a saltine

NAME OF SAFETY: Cornell

OPTIONAL ESSAY: No. My question 16 answer was weak too.

WHAT GOT ME REJECTED: I am bland with no softs and I can't write good.
ROFL. That is all.

Re: Rejected from my "SAFETY"

Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 2:20 pm
by booboo
boo_pragmatism wrote:
sarlis wrote:
kittenmittons wrote: WHAT GOT ME REJECTED: I am bland with no softs and I can't write good.
i see
Hi! I'm sarcasm! Have we met?
I was hoping the latter portion was intended as irony.

Re: Rejected from my "SAFETY"

Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 2:20 pm
by sarlis
Kiersten1985 wrote:
sarlis wrote:
kittenmittons wrote: WHAT GOT ME REJECTED: I am bland with no softs and I can't write good.
i see
I think that was intentional...

haha i know.

Re: Rejected from my "SAFETY"

Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 2:32 pm
by cubswin
Good to see that Cornell is saving some room for me... :P

Re: Rejected from my "SAFETY"

Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 3:16 pm
by and the beast
shadowfrost000 wrote:
kittenmittons wrote:GPA 3.6 LSAT 175
URM: White as a saltine

NAME OF SAFETY: Cornell

OPTIONAL ESSAY: No. My question 16 answer was weak too.

WHAT GOT ME REJECTED: I am bland with no softs and I can't write good.
ROFL. That is all.

thinking of you laughing at this just made me actually laugh out loud. i don't even know you. is that sad?

Re: Rejected from my "SAFETY"

Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 3:19 pm
by MC Southstar
and the beast wrote:
shadowfrost000 wrote:
kittenmittons wrote:GPA 3.6 LSAT 175
URM: White as a saltine

NAME OF SAFETY: Cornell

OPTIONAL ESSAY: No. My question 16 answer was weak too.

WHAT GOT ME REJECTED: I am bland with no softs and I can't write good.
ROFL. That is all.

thinking of you laughing at this just made me actually laugh out loud. i don't even know you. is that sad?
Would you like to get to know me... in the shower?

Re: Rejected from my "SAFETY"

Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 3:20 pm
by rapstar
where, if anywhere, have you already been accepted?

Re: Rejected from my "SAFETY"

Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 3:23 pm
by and the beast
shadowfrost000 wrote:
and the beast wrote:
shadowfrost000 wrote:
kittenmittons wrote:GPA 3.6 LSAT 175
URM: White as a saltine

NAME OF SAFETY: Cornell

OPTIONAL ESSAY: No. My question 16 answer was weak too.

WHAT GOT ME REJECTED: I am bland with no softs and I can't write good.
ROFL. That is all.

thinking of you laughing at this just made me actually laugh out loud. i don't even know you. is that sad?
Would you like to get to know me... in the shower?
absolutely. you bring some soap and i'll bring some jello shots.

Re: Rejected from my "SAFETY"

Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 4:37 pm
by thalassocrat
boo_pragmatism wrote:
and the beast wrote:absolutely. you bring some soap and i'll bring some [strike]jello shots[/strike] VD.
FTFY
Hey now, s/he can bring both. Tis the season to give, after all.

Re: Rejected from my "SAFETY"

Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 4:43 pm
by daesonesb
Who cares? You're gonna be in at several other T-14's anyway. This just saves you the hassle of withdrawing later on.

Out of curiosity: No softs? Like, you put nothing on your resume? You could at least have volunteered at a few charitable organizations or tutored some freshmen or something.

Re: Rejected from my "SAFETY"

Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 4:52 pm
by 98234872348
kittenmittons wrote:WHAT GOT ME REJECTED: I am bland with no softs and I can't write good.
That is self evident, apparently...

Re: Rejected from my "SAFETY"

Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 4:56 pm
by daesonesb
boo_pragmatism wrote:
jayzon wrote:In many places, they are positively correlated.
Some might say a causal relationship exists. VD causes jello shots.
Both tend to cause temporary burning sensations, just in different regions of the body.

Re: Rejected from my "SAFETY"

Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 5:13 pm
by rcharles
Most people who shower together take jello shots.
All people who take jello shots have VD.
Some people who have VD don't use soap.
It is not the case that people with VD use wash cloths.

Assuming all information above is true, which of the following can be reasonably inferred:

A. All people with VD take jello shots.
B. A person who showers with another person will likely not use wash cloths.
C. Anyone who drinks Vodka has Herpes.
D. People with VD should be required to use soap.
E. Trojan and Jelo should launch a cooperative marketing campaign.

Re: Rejected from my "SAFETY"

Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 5:21 pm
by rcharles
boo_pragmatism wrote:I'll take F: Rcharles has a virulent strain of jello shot vd
This is not the credited response......I hope, I'll have to wait for the results.

Re: Rejected from my "SAFETY"

Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 5:24 pm
by Helmholtz
kittenmittons wrote:GPA 3.6 LSAT 175
URM: White as a saltine

NAME OF SAFETY: Cornell

OPTIONAL ESSAY: No. My question 16 answer was weak too.

WHAT GOT ME REJECTED: I am bland with no softs and I can't write good.
I'm amazed you have such good numbers, Cornell could probably see right through that smoke screen.

Re: Rejected from my "SAFETY"

Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 5:36 pm
by and the beast
rcharles wrote:Most people who shower together take jello shots.
All people who take jello shots have VD.
Some people who have VD don't use soap.
It is not the case that people with VD use wash cloths.

Assuming all information above is true, which of the following can be reasonably inferred:

A. All people with VD take jello shots.
B. A person who showers with another person will likely not use wash cloths.
C. Anyone who drinks Vodka has Herpes.
D. People with VD should be required to use soap.
E. Trojan and Jelo should launch a cooperative marketing campaign.
E. Slogan: We'll make you wiggle.

Re: Rejected from my "SAFETY"

Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 1:09 pm
by kittenmittons
Conflating VDs and a Cornell JD just feels right. Something about how the sting of both stays with you forever.

Re: Rejected from my "SAFETY"

Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 3:17 pm
by peyso
boo_pragmatism wrote:
jayzon wrote:In many places, they are positively correlated.
Some might say a causal relationship exists. VD causes jello shots.
I think i broke my computer b/c I spit water all over the monitor

Re: Rejected from my "SAFETY"

Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 3:21 pm
by Sauer Grapes
....