I did find a couple of people on LSN from last year who did not get their hold until March even though they applied in the fall.law_monkey wrote:It's not that people feel wronged in any way either. We're just confused because they seemed to place people on hold if they didn't have a decision for them yet, so we're surprised by the fact that there seems to be an unofficial hold. Status checkers add a little transparency to the process, and they at least help determine where you are in the process.subtle wrote:melamine wrote:before everyone starts freaking out... it's not their job to make decisions in such a way as to make their applicants happy. they have their system, and they'll make their decisions - they have a lot of sh** to deal with, and its unreasonable to expect their schedule to conform with what's going to make people happy.
I, for one, understand that. That said, it doesn't make it any less frustrating. I don't know about you, but I come here to vent with other people about how this whole process is driving me slightly batty.
Columbia 2011! Forum
-
sarahlawg

- Posts: 1001
- Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 5:59 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
- ahduth

- Posts: 2467
- Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 10:55 am
Re: Columbia 2011!
They also add that exotic feel of going to school in the 21st century.law_monkey wrote:It's not that people feel wronged in any way either. We're just confused because they seemed to place people on hold if they didn't have a decision for them yet, so we're surprised by the fact that there seems to be an unofficial hold. Status checkers add a little transparency to the process, and they at least help determine where you are in the process.
I think everyone's perfectly justified in being pissed off, unless they got a fee waiver. I paid like... 80 dollars or something for the honor of being put through this process.
- ArchRoark

- Posts: 1000
- Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2010 2:53 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
Rejected today, letter dated 02/01/11. Good luck to everyone still waiting!
- Ratchet Jackson

- Posts: 2701
- Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 6:41 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
Sorry to hear that. But if it's any consolation, your 'tar is $$$$$. One of the best albums I have ever heard.ArchRoark wrote:Rejected today, letter dated 02/01/11. Good luck to everyone still waiting!
- law_monkey

- Posts: 1709
- Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2010 5:25 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
If that's what happens to me I definitely won't be attending CLS just because I won't be at any of their ASWs or doing a campus visits before deposits. Not that that would offend them because obviously they're offering acceptances to the people they want, but the longer this is prolonged the less time I'll have to figure out a visit in the event that I would get accepted.sarahlawg wrote:I did find a couple of people on LSN from last year who did not get their hold until March even though they applied in the fall.law_monkey wrote:It's not that people feel wronged in any way either. We're just confused because they seemed to place people on hold if they didn't have a decision for them yet, so we're surprised by the fact that there seems to be an unofficial hold. Status checkers add a little transparency to the process, and they at least help determine where you are in the process.subtle wrote:melamine wrote:before everyone starts freaking out... it's not their job to make decisions in such a way as to make their applicants happy. they have their system, and they'll make their decisions - they have a lot of sh** to deal with, and its unreasonable to expect their schedule to conform with what's going to make people happy.
I, for one, understand that. That said, it doesn't make it any less frustrating. I don't know about you, but I come here to vent with other people about how this whole process is driving me slightly batty.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Ctgrapefruit

- Posts: 67
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2011 6:56 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
Did those people wait it out?sarahlawg wrote:I did find a couple of people on LSN from last year who did not get their hold until March even though they applied in the fall.law_monkey wrote:It's not that people feel wronged in any way either. We're just confused because they seemed to place people on hold if they didn't have a decision for them yet, so we're surprised by the fact that there seems to be an unofficial hold. Status checkers add a little transparency to the process, and they at least help determine where you are in the process.subtle wrote:melamine wrote:before everyone starts freaking out... it's not their job to make decisions in such a way as to make their applicants happy. they have their system, and they'll make their decisions - they have a lot of sh** to deal with, and its unreasonable to expect their schedule to conform with what's going to make people happy.
I, for one, understand that. That said, it doesn't make it any less frustrating. I don't know about you, but I come here to vent with other people about how this whole process is driving me slightly batty.
-
7ED

- Posts: 276
- Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 9:26 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
I am going to shoot them off a gentle e-mail inquiring about financial aid for students who havn't heard back yet (getting some aid is essential for me). Hopefully I might also be able to glean something about my admissions status.
- Non-Chalant1

- Posts: 852
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 1:54 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
Already did this around 4:55 PM today. It was too late by the time I thought of it. We'll know tomorrow I guess.7ED wrote:I am going to shoot them off a gentle e-mail inquiring about financial aid for students who havn't heard back yet (getting some aid is essential for me). Hopefully I might also be able to glean something about my admissions status.
-
lshamlet

- Posts: 120
- Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 8:46 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
No offense but you guys really love to overcomplicate this as much as possible. I don't quite understand why people are freaking out to know that CLS simply hasn't made a decision on some applicants. Did you all really expect them to have a decision for every applicant come Feb? Why overanalyze it?
-
Ctgrapefruit

- Posts: 67
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2011 6:56 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
I am so offendedlshamlet wrote:No offense but you guys really love to overcomplicate this as much as possible. I don't quite understand why people are freaking out to know that CLS simply hasn't made a decision on some applicants. Did you all really expect them to have a decision for every applicant come Feb? Why overanalyze it?
- incompetentia

- Posts: 2277
- Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:57 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
shut up you're messing up my computational error calculationslshamlet wrote:No offense but you guys really love to overcomplicate this as much as possible. I don't quite understand why people are freaking out to know that CLS simply hasn't made a decision on some applicants. Did you all really expect them to have a decision for every applicant come Feb? Why overanalyze it?
- Non-Chalant1

- Posts: 852
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 1:54 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
They are considerably slower than comparable schools that's why. The lack of transparency is what is making people insane. It's all relative.lshamlet wrote:No offense but you guys really love to overcomplicate this as much as possible. I don't quite understand why people are freaking out to know that CLS simply hasn't made a decision on some applicants. Did you all really expect them to have a decision for every applicant come Feb? Why overanalyze it?
-
lshamlet

- Posts: 120
- Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 8:46 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
That's still not an excuse, I can understand being upset or worried that a school hasn't accepted you after people have begun to be accepted. That's fine, we all care. But a lot of people, especially in this thread, give off a really neurotic vibe, and I can just imagine them sitting there wringing their hands about "batches" and "waves" and "the forgotten" and "vomit-colored envelopes."Non-Chalant1 wrote:They are considerably slower than comparable schools that's why. The lack of transparency is what is making people insane. It's all relative.lshamlet wrote:No offense but you guys really love to overcomplicate this as much as possible. I don't quite understand why people are freaking out to know that CLS simply hasn't made a decision on some applicants. Did you all really expect them to have a decision for every applicant come Feb? Why overanalyze it?
Just seems like a lot of people can't divorce themselves from the process and take it way too personally.
Last edited by lshamlet on Mon Feb 07, 2011 9:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
7ED

- Posts: 276
- Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 9:26 pm
!
Your heresy will not go unpunished. Idolaters be damned!lshamlet wrote:No offense but you guys really love to overcomplicate this as much as possible. I don't quite understand why people are freaking out to know that CLS simply hasn't made a decision on some applicants. Did you all really expect them to have a decision for every applicant come Feb? Why overanalyze it?
- Non-Chalant1

- Posts: 852
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 1:54 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
I mean I hear you. Look at my username and you'll know how I feel about it at this point. I always say everyone in awhile TLS makes me scared of what Law school will be like.lshamlet wrote:That's still not an excuse, I can understand being upset or worried that a school hasn't accepted you after people have begun to be accepted. That's fine, we all care. But a lot of people, especially in this thread, give off a really neurotic vibe, and I can just imagine them sitting there wringing their hands about "batches" and "waves" and "the forgotten" and "vomit-colored envelopes."Non-Chalant1 wrote:They are considerably slower than comparable schools that's why. The lack of transparency is what is making people insane. It's all relative.lshamlet wrote:No offense but you guys really love to overcomplicate this as much as possible. I don't quite understand why people are freaking out to know that CLS simply hasn't made a decision on some applicants. Did you all really expect them to have a decision for every applicant come Feb? Why overanalyze it?
Just seems like a lot of people can't divorce themselves from the process and take it way too personally.
- NikaneOkie

- Posts: 222
- Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 12:39 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
neuroticism is hot.lshamlet wrote:That's still not an excuse, I can understand being upset or worried that a school hasn't accepted you after people have begun to be accepted. That's fine, we all care. But a lot of people, especially in this thread, give off a really neurotic vibe, and I can just imagine them sitting there wringing their hands about "batches" and "waves" and "the forgotten" and "vomit-colored envelopes."Non-Chalant1 wrote:They are considerably slower than comparable schools that's why. The lack of transparency is what is making people insane. It's all relative.lshamlet wrote:No offense but you guys really love to overcomplicate this as much as possible. I don't quite understand why people are freaking out to know that CLS simply hasn't made a decision on some applicants. Did you all really expect them to have a decision for every applicant come Feb? Why overanalyze it?
Just seems like a lot of people can't divorce themselves from the process and take it way too personally.
- Weirdlog

- Posts: 210
- Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 4:48 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
In the words of Michael Scott, "Business is always personal. It's the most personal thing in the world."lshamlet wrote:That's still not an excuse, I can understand being upset or worried that a school hasn't accepted you after people have begun to be accepted. That's fine, we all care. But a lot of people, especially in this thread, give off a really neurotic vibe, and I can just imagine them sitting there wringing their hands about "batches" and "waves" and "the forgotten" and "vomit-colored envelopes."Non-Chalant1 wrote:They are considerably slower than comparable schools that's why. The lack of transparency is what is making people insane. It's all relative.lshamlet wrote:No offense but you guys really love to overcomplicate this as much as possible. I don't quite understand why people are freaking out to know that CLS simply hasn't made a decision on some applicants. Did you all really expect them to have a decision for every applicant come Feb? Why overanalyze it?
Just seems like a lot of people can't divorce themselves from the process and take it way too personally.
I don't think any of us "take it personally" when a law school chooses not to accept us. But if our neuroticism can help us through the stressful and overall crappy process that is applying to law school--I'm all for it. It's harder for some of us to take the non-chalant attitude you seem to be advancing--and yes, this might be a personality flaw of ours.
But, to quote Kesha this time, "We R who we R"
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- arkansawyer

- Posts: 220
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2010 5:11 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
Hey guys, I got the email confirming my acceptance today, still no VCE though.
Submitted 11/18, fall grades request mid-January.
WHOOO HOO!!
Submitted 11/18, fall grades request mid-January.
WHOOO HOO!!
- Weirdlog

- Posts: 210
- Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 4:48 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
Excuse me, should be: "Ke$ha."Weirdlog wrote:
But, to quote Kesha this time, "We R who we R"
- arism87

- Posts: 1310
- Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2010 7:46 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
So.. on a scale of 1-10, how bad is it if I do?Weirdlog wrote: I don't think any of us "take it personally" when a law school chooses not to accept us.
Note: only if I'm over both medians. Lookin at you, CLS.
-
sarahlawg

- Posts: 1001
- Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 5:59 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
They were also given the 4/20something response date and were waitlisted like everyone else (well, most people).Ctgrapefruit wrote:Did those people wait it out?sarahlawg wrote:I did find a couple of people on LSN from last year who did not get their hold until March even though they applied in the fall.law_monkey wrote:It's not that people feel wronged in any way either. We're just confused because they seemed to place people on hold if they didn't have a decision for them yet, so we're surprised by the fact that there seems to be an unofficial hold. Status checkers add a little transparency to the process, and they at least help determine where you are in the process.subtle wrote:
I, for one, understand that. That said, it doesn't make it any less frustrating. I don't know about you, but I come here to vent with other people about how this whole process is driving me slightly batty.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
jerrymander

- Posts: 27
- Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 8:59 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
VCE today on West Coast, submitted 1/7, complete 1/20, postmarked 2/3. Index 4.4.
Good luck everyone!
Good luck everyone!
- ArchRoark

- Posts: 1000
- Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2010 2:53 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
Ha, its all good. I expected it.RJ127 wrote:Sorry to hear that. But if it's any consolation, your 'tar is $$$$$. One of the best albums I have ever heard.ArchRoark wrote:Rejected today, letter dated 02/01/11. Good luck to everyone still waiting!
But yah, DOOM is most definitely in the T6 of hip-hop. (Wow, I feel like a nerd for saying that)
-
smscat

- Posts: 88
- Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 6:58 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
Finally submitted my app!
Q: My LSAC Report has my transcript from last semester. Columbia was a last minute app because they just gave me a fee waiver. If I update my transcript, do I send it to them directly at this point or LSAC? Is it worth it? My GPA only went up .01, but I don't want them to think I'm not taking classes or something this semester.
Q: My LSAC Report has my transcript from last semester. Columbia was a last minute app because they just gave me a fee waiver. If I update my transcript, do I send it to them directly at this point or LSAC? Is it worth it? My GPA only went up .01, but I don't want them to think I'm not taking classes or something this semester.
-
tomwatts

- Posts: 1710
- Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 12:01 am
Re: Columbia 2011!
If I'm not mistaken, 1) They normally do have a pretty good record of deciding about most of the strong/weak candidates at least, so this "hold for people who would normally get in" business and "forgotten-about super-strong applicants" category are both sort of weird, and 2) TLS is based on overanalyzing everything (cf. my data-mining posts on 170+ scorers, YLS and SLS decision dates, etc.).lshamlet wrote:No offense but you guys really love to overcomplicate this as much as possible. I don't quite understand why people are freaking out to know that CLS simply hasn't made a decision on some applicants. Did you all really expect them to have a decision for every applicant come Feb? Why overanalyze it?
I don't know if someone has hypothesized this yet in nearly 300 pages of thread, but I'm starting to wonder if snow delays have affected not just snail mail but decision rate. That is, CLS admissions people may have been slowed by being snowed out and may not have gotten to all of the apps that they normally get to. Yale is a good 1-2 weeks behind schedule, as far as I can tell, so why not CLS, too? That might be the reason for the extended waves of admits.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login