A friend of mine is still waiting with a 175+ 3.9+, late November or early December submit...MachineLemon wrote:175+ and still waiting. Late October submit.bluenoser wrote:Anyone else with a 175 still waiting?
Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle) Forum
- Elendil

- Posts: 516
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2011 12:45 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
- WhiteGuy5

- Posts: 918
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 3:47 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I remember hearing that Columbia puts more emphasis on where you went to UG than most schools. If so, I went to a very low-on-prestige public school. I've always presumed that dimmed my chances at Columbia specifically.Nelson wrote:You'll probably get in. Columbia is very predictable and you're at the LSAT median/above the GPA median. I wouldn't worry yet, there haven't been that many people with numbers worse than yours get in up until now besides ED and URM so you're not being passed over.WhiteGuy5 wrote:I'm right under 3.87 =(thestillpoint wrote:Honestly, I have no idea. But if you search LSN for those with 172 and 3.87 - 3.91, you can find six who list a decision for Columbia. Only one was waitlisted. Three were accepted in Feb, one was accepted in January. One was accepted with no date given. Two received a $25,000 scholarship and one received a $30,000.
I don't know the logic, but, despite the small sample size, I've now remained hopeful for both an acceptance and even the possibility of some merit aid for those of us who haven't heard.
- Mr. Somebody

- Posts: 865
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 11:42 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Lol is anyone else still waiting who doesn't have auto admit numbers? 
-
likemike

- Posts: 68
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 1:20 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Mr. Somebody wrote:Lol is anyone else still waiting who doesn't have auto admit numbers?
Yup. 170/4.03
-
snehpets

- Posts: 1164
- Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
With your scholarship situation and strong interest in CLS, why didn't you ED? Just curious, not making a point or anything. I know there are a lot of reasons not to.WhiteGuy5 wrote:
I remember hearing that Columbia puts more emphasis on where you went to UG than most schools. If so, I went to a very low-on-prestige public school. I've always presumed that dimmed my chances at Columbia specifically.
Also, I really think you'll get in/be fine. I'm in a less than prestigious major at a less than prestigious undergrad and it doesn't seem to have mattered. I think a great undergrad can help you but I don't think a bad undergrad really hurts you.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Nelson

- Posts: 2058
- Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 12:43 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Interesting. I'd never heard that. Still, if there was ever a year to bend on that kind of stuff, this would be it since they're going to need all of the 172s they can get to hold the line on the median.WhiteGuy5 wrote:I remember hearing that Columbia puts more emphasis on where you went to UG than most schools. If so, I went to a very low-on-prestige public school. I've always presumed that dimmed my chances at Columbia specifically.
- catwomangirl

- Posts: 250
- Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 2:50 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I am non-auto, but with various soft type things going for me.likemike wrote:Mr. Somebody wrote:Lol is anyone else still waiting who doesn't have auto admit numbers?
Yup. 170/4.03
-
bluenoser

- Posts: 19
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 8:47 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Good to know I'm not the only one still waiting with higher numbers. I was beginning to think it might just be because I'm an international student. I can hyperventilate a little less now...Elendil wrote:A friend of mine is still waiting with a 175+ 3.9+, late November or early December submit...MachineLemon wrote:175+ and still waiting. Late October submit.bluenoser wrote:Anyone else with a 175 still waiting?
- JamMasterJ

- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
samezworykin wrote:176 count?bluenoser wrote:Anyone else with a 175 still waiting?
- kwais

- Posts: 1675
- Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 12:28 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
must say that this seems spot on. Everyone and their mom here went to Ivy + Berkeley etc.WhiteGuy5 wrote:I remember hearing that Columbia puts more emphasis on where you went to UG than most schools. If so, I went to a very low-on-prestige public school. I've always presumed that dimmed my chances at Columbia specifically.Nelson wrote:You'll probably get in. Columbia is very predictable and you're at the LSAT median/above the GPA median. I wouldn't worry yet, there haven't been that many people with numbers worse than yours get in up until now besides ED and URM so you're not being passed over.WhiteGuy5 wrote:I'm right under 3.87 =(thestillpoint wrote:Honestly, I have no idea. But if you search LSN for those with 172 and 3.87 - 3.91, you can find six who list a decision for Columbia. Only one was waitlisted. Three were accepted in Feb, one was accepted in January. One was accepted with no date given. Two received a $25,000 scholarship and one received a $30,000.
I don't know the logic, but, despite the small sample size, I've now remained hopeful for both an acceptance and even the possibility of some merit aid for those of us who haven't heard.
- Mr. Somebody

- Posts: 865
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 11:42 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
That could be self selection - undergrad gunner = LS gunnerkwais wrote:
must say that this seems spot on. Everyone and their mom here went to Ivy + Berkeley etc.
If what WG said is true though, I'm screwed
-
maxpower430

- Posts: 419
- Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2010 9:16 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
still waiting here too, mid-November submit.
-
snehpets

- Posts: 1164
- Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
yeah, this. not only are people at prestigious undergrads perhaps more likely to get the grades/LSAT necessary to get into Columbia, they might also be the type to choose Columbia for the name. not all of them obviously, but certainly enough to give this impression.Mr. Somebody wrote:That could be self selection - undergrad gunner = LS gunnerkwais wrote:
must say that this seems spot on. Everyone and their mom here went to Ivy + Berkeley etc.
If what WG said is true though, I'm screwed
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- sn20

- Posts: 157
- Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 1:36 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
170/3.87 here. submitted 9/30likemike wrote:Mr. Somebody wrote:Lol is anyone else still waiting who doesn't have auto admit numbers?
Yup. 170/4.03
- emkay625

- Posts: 1988
- Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 11:31 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Yup. 3.23/173. I thought I would've gotten dinged weeks ago.Mr. Somebody wrote:Lol is anyone else still waiting who doesn't have auto admit numbers?
- zworykin

- Posts: 438
- Joined: Thu May 20, 2010 4:18 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Wait, though. He just said "prestige" without specifying how the school earned that prestige.Mr. Somebody wrote:That could be self selection - undergrad gunner = LS gunnerkwais wrote:
must say that this seems spot on. Everyone and their mom here went to Ivy + Berkeley etc.
If what WG said is true though, I'm screwed
I refer you to the definition of the term:
My undergrad institution is a veritable fixture on Playboy's annual top party schools list, with a win and several top-three finishes in the past decade. Surely this sort of prestige should count for something, yes?reputation or influence arising from success, achievement, rank, or other favorable attributes.
- tempur_three

- Posts: 59
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 11:14 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I didn't go to a prestigious undergrad. I also submitted in december if that helps anyone.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Genki

- Posts: 246
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 9:04 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
@tempure_three
I smile everytime I see your avatar.

I smile everytime I see your avatar.
- luxxe

- Posts: 830
- Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 11:12 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Hoping for the same. My school just made HuffPo's Socially Awkward Colleges listzworykin wrote: Wait, though. He just said "prestige" without specifying how the school earned that prestige.
I refer you to the definition of the term:My undergrad institution is a veritable fixture on Playboy's annual top party schools list, with a win and several top-three finishes in the past decade. Surely this sort of prestige should count for something, yes?reputation or influence arising from success, achievement, rank, or other favorable attributes.
-
pupperoni

- Posts: 60
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:48 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
columbia does in fact put a lot of emphasis on UG quality. people who get in with borderline numbers 170/171/~3.8 are mostly from ivy UGs or have unique work experiences.
- jwalterweatherman

- Posts: 45
- Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2011 7:07 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I'm 172/3.9, but I'm a baby JD (K-JD?). I think that puts me in this group.Mr. Somebody wrote:Lol is anyone else still waiting who doesn't have auto admit numbers?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- mikeylikesit

- Posts: 126
- Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 12:17 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
170/3.8. (But URM so who knows where that really puts me...)Mr. Somebody wrote:Lol is anyone else still waiting who doesn't have auto admit numbers?
- AmandaPB

- Posts: 430
- Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 1:37 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Still waiting here.
-
cgomez

- Posts: 40
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 10:17 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
still waiting, didn't break 170 and my gpa is also slightly below median. so everyday with no waitlist or rejection is a great day for me lol
- ScoutFinch

- Posts: 109
- Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 6:34 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Heeeyyy, I went to that school! I think we should get extra credit for managing >3.0 in that environmentzworykin wrote:Wait, though. He just said "prestige" without specifying how the school earned that prestige.Mr. Somebody wrote:That could be self selection - undergrad gunner = LS gunnerkwais wrote:
must say that this seems spot on. Everyone and their mom here went to Ivy + Berkeley etc.
If what WG said is true though, I'm screwed
I refer you to the definition of the term:My undergrad institution is a veritable fixture on Playboy's annual top party schools list, with a win and several top-three finishes in the past decade. Surely this sort of prestige should count for something, yes?reputation or influence arising from success, achievement, rank, or other favorable attributes.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login