.
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2023 9:15 pm
.
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=68&t=313913
This is not likely to happen. To over-simplify, the courts have ruled that CFPB's structure is unconstitutional but that its structural scheme in the statutes is severable from the remainder of CFPB's existence. The structure is unconstitutional but the existence is constitutional.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Feb 17, 2023 10:02 pmDepending on when you start, there may not be a CFPB at all.
Ok nerdAnonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Feb 21, 2023 11:31 amThis is not likely to happen. To over-simplify, the courts have ruled that CFPB's structure is unconstitutional but that its structural scheme in the statutes is severable from the remainder of CFPB's existence. The structure is unconstitutional but the existence is constitutional.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Feb 17, 2023 10:02 pmDepending on when you start, there may not be a CFPB at all.
If you're applying to the CFPB, you may as well get caught up by reading and analyzing all of this stuff. It's straight outta Con Law 1.
We run the world; just trying to help!Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Feb 21, 2023 1:01 pmOk nerdAnonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Feb 21, 2023 11:31 amThis is not likely to happen. To over-simplify, the courts have ruled that CFPB's structure is unconstitutional but that its structural scheme in the statutes is severable from the remainder of CFPB's existence. The structure is unconstitutional but the existence is constitutional.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Feb 17, 2023 10:02 pmDepending on when you start, there may not be a CFPB at all.
If you're applying to the CFPB, you may as well get caught up by reading and analyzing all of this stuff. It's straight outta Con Law 1.