adderall and LSAT
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 3:29 pm
please comment.
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=93186
AstuteTheWire wrote:The LSAT is extremely important...like for real. \
really?talibkweli wrote:and fix the spelling of the thread title. a dyxlexic 6 year old could have done a better job spelling "adderall."
Credited Response.TheWire wrote:I've been really interested on the topic but here is my two cents. The LSAT is extremely important...like for real. With that being said, it is not like other tests. Cramming a bunch of material in a brief period of time will probably do you no good. You need to become familiar with the question types/ comfortable with the way in which LSAT questions must be approached. So, unless you need to be up and focused for long,long hours, I feel that it may be more beneficial to learn to study in a non cracked out wat so that you can be "normal" during the LSAT...
But i also would like to see what others think; I recently took the LSAT in september and did really well but this debate definetely rattled in my mind for awhile...
Really? Don't you think that was a deliberate reach? Any dyxlexic 6 year old that can do a better job of spelling adderall needs to be reexamined.talibkweli wrote:Manash wrote:really?talibkweli wrote:and fix the spelling of the thread title. a dyxlexic 6 year old could have done a better job spelling "adderall."
uh....i meant to do that?
Calling you out? No quite. Just poking fun a bit. Did I make a mistake on the spelling? Well how about that...wasn't that what I was poking fun at? Ehhh the internet...so much gets lost in translation. I know how to spell the word but thought it was funny that you were knocking the guy for his spelling yet you had spelled the word incorrectly yourself while using a 6 year old as your example. Bah! lost humor.talibkweli wrote:I meant that i misspelled "dyslexic" and thought you were rightfully calling me out. but lo and behold, you've made the same mistake. so ha!Manash wrote:[quote="talibkweli
Really? Don't you think that was a deliberate reach? Any dyxlexic 6 year old that can do a better job of spelling adderall needs to be reexamined.
also, i maintain that adderall will not help you go from 160 to 180. not only will it destroy your reading comp performance, it'll make you overly confident in a way that'll leave you vulnerable to trap answers and stuff. plus, it will make it MUCH harder to get the toughest of the tough lr and rc questions that lsac uses to seperate the men (170+) from the boys (the 160-169 strivers)
Mall_cop$ wrote:You seem confident about this. Is this from personal experience or from a scientific study?talibkweli wrote: also, i maintain that adderall will ...not only will it destroy your reading comp performance, it'll make you overly confident in a way that'll leave you vulnerable to trap answers and stuff. plus, it will make it MUCH harder to get the toughest of the tough lr and rc questions that lsac uses to seperate the men (170+) from the boys (the 160-169 strivers)
I find it funny how bent out of shape some get over the perceived use of a drug.Evidence?talibkweli wrote:adderall helps dumb people do things like go from a140 to a 145. to score at the 170+ level, however, you need the kind of grasp of subtelty and nuanced language that being cracked out on adderall precludes. HTH!
talibkweli wrote:fix the spelling of the thread title.Irony?
let those of us who can spell well take care of this type of douchebaggery.talibkweli wrote:i suck at spelling and don't care to use spell check, this is true. i still wouldn't so blatantly misspell a thread title, however.
i'm not bent out of shape about this stuff. i'm smarter than the vast majority of lsat takes, and there is nothing in the world that anyone can injest that will change that.
ive tried adderall while taking a preptest, and am familiar with its physiological effects. moreover, i was refuting the common notion that adderall can do wonders for one's lsat performance. no need to dig up empricial studies in this context....this isn't a research paper, and i don't care all that much about helping you choose either way!
OWNAGE.superserial wrote:let those of us who can spell well take care of this type of douchebaggery.talibkweli wrote:i suck at spelling and don't care to use spell check, this is true. i still wouldn't so blatantly misspell a thread title, however.
i'm not bent out of shape about this stuff. i'm smarter than the vast majority of lsat takes, and there is nothing in the world that anyone can injest that will change that.
ive tried adderall while taking a preptest, and am familiar with its physiological effects. moreover, i was refuting the common notion that adderall can do wonders for one's lsat performance. no need to dig up empricial studies in this context....this isn't a research paper, and i don't care all that much about helping you choose either way!
bouakedojo wrote:Not to hijack this thread, Talib, but I thought it was hilarious when I read recently that Christian Bale's inspiration for the character in your tar was Tom Cruise.
Another one...talibkweli wrote:bouakedojo wrote:Not to hijack this thread, Talib, but I thought it was hilarious when I read recently that Christian Bale's inspiration for the character in your tar was Tom Cruise.
Really? Tom Cruise was actually going to play that role before Bale, and I think he would have been unintentionally hilarious.