pt 28 lr section 3 q 16 Forum
- NuanceSpecialist
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 2:57 am
pt 28 lr section 3 q 16
I chose A since it passed the negation technique. It in fact hurt the conclusion but I am not sure why choice b can be better than choice a.
-
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:26 am
Re: pt 28 lr section 3 q 16
i had also chosen A, this is what i thought after finding out i chose the wrong answer: the hypothesis is that beethhoven's deafness was caused by venereal disease. the evidence they cite is that mercury was ingested in his time to treat VD. however what if everyone ingested mercury? the assumption is that there were people that did not ingest mercury because they did not have VD. so if there were people that did not ingest mercury because they did not have VD, this implies the trace of mercury would mean he was being treated for VD.
hope this makes sense, i'm not sure it does haha.
hope this makes sense, i'm not sure it does haha.
-
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 5:19 pm
Re: pt 28 lr section 3 q 16
bump...someone explain this please