Which LR was experimental??

[Raz14]

I had the Socrates question and my experimental was RC.. so that section was real

Did you have multiple questions that were linked together and connected to only one stimulus?

[Croissant]

the number of ?'s for the LR sections was 24 - 26 - 25. do you remember how many ?'s were on your test?

I think I had 25 for all of them

I also had 25 for all three. That's really strange that they would make it uneven for other testtakers.

[idespisethelsat]

I had the Socrates question and my experimental was RC.. so that section was real

Did you have multiple questions that were linked together and connected to only one stimulus?

No.

[CCA]

I had the Socrates question and my experimental was RC.. so that section was real

Did you have multiple questions that were linked together and connected to only one stimulus?

Was that the same section that had the very long easy question about not increasing demand for something? I think that was 3 and the experimental.

[hous]

I had the Socrates question and my experimental was RC.. so that section was real

holla lulla!

I was most confident on that one.

I hope first was exper.

25LR 27RC 25LR 25LR 23LG

[moontavern22]

idespise, do you recall having a LR section with 26 questions?

[idespisethelsat]

idespise, do you recall having a LR section with 26 questions?

Yup, I did

[Raz14]

Yes. Which was section 3 for me. Section 1, with brains/computers and blood pressure, and 25 questions, was the real deal. Easier section 3 was not unfortunately.

[lsatcracker]

the 4th - socrates section, if convention holds is definately not experimental. and i had 1st - wth 25 question and 3rd wth 26 questions. so the question is whether the 1st wth 25 was experimental or the 3rd wth 26 questions was. i am hoping the 3rd with 26 questions is exp...

[hous]

I had the Socrates question and my experimental was RC.. so that section was real

Did you have multiple questions that were linked together and connected to only one stimulus?

I dont think I had a single one of these dual questions and I had 3 LR sections.

[hous]

the 3rd - socrates section, if convention holds is definately not experimental. and i had 1st - wth 25 question and 3rd wth 26 questions. so the question is whether the 1st wth 25 was experimental or the 3rd wth 26 questions was. i am hoping the 3rd with 26 questions is exp...

I didnt have any LR section with 26 questions, so that was your exper.

[jennifer1]

I don't remember which section Socrates was for me. Is it the one with the Newton/gravitational force question? Please tell me that was the real deal...

[Aimbo]

the blood pressure/anger/heart disease one was real unfortunately.

The section you guys had with multiple questions on a single stimulus must have been the experimental as this was not on my exam! Every question for the two sections that count in this exam had only one question per stimulus!

[Mikey1]

All of us have said that we had LR for 1, 3, and 4. Could it be, though, that the LSAC would switch around for some test-takes which LR is experimental or is it uniform across? In other words, some may have had LR1 be exp while others had LR3 be the experimental.

Definitely. The guy next to me started with a different section than I did, with LG, but I had LR for 1, 2, and 3, then LG, then RC.

[ObLaDiObLaDa]

My roommate and I are trying to figure this out.

The heart/blood pressure/psychological one was real. The brain/computer was real.

[rainmaker614]

I also had: 1. LR 2.RC 3.LR 4.LR 5.LG

Obviously, one of the first 2 LR's are experimental. The 2nd LR section (Section 3/5) was MUCH easier and "normal" than the first section. The Socrates section was the 4th/6 section and the first section was fairly odd. Some difficult questions were up at the begining (unusual) and one or a few parralel questions were up front too (I think). I hope the 1st section was experimental because it was a lot more time consuming. It was unusual so I hope that confirms it. As for the different forms, yes there are different forms but if someone has the 3 LR sections in the order that I stated above, then there is the sections are in the same order. I am also pretty sure that there are a few "odd ball" ordered tests but it seems like all of us have the standard forms. And none of my sections had the multiple questions per stimulus thing going on.

Which section was the heart/anger one?

(Please let the first section be experimental!!!)

Also, what do you guys think the grading scale will be? -10=170?

[CCA]

I also had: 1. LR 2.RC 3.LR 4.LR 5.LG

Obviously, one of the first 2 LR's are experimental. The 2nd LR section (Section 3/5) was MUCH easier and "normal" than the first section. The Socrates section was the 4th/6 section and the first section was fairly odd. Some difficult questions were up at the begining (unusual) and one or a few parralel questions were up front too (I think). I hope the 1st section was experimental because it was a lot more time consuming. It was unusual so I hope that confirms it. As for the different forms, yes there are different forms but if someone has the 3 LR sections in the order that I stated above, then there is the sections are in the same order. I am also pretty sure that there are a few "odd ball" ordered tests but it seems like all of us have the standard forms.

(Please let the first section be experimental!!!)

Also, what do you guys think the grading scale will be? -10=170?

The first was not the experimenetal. I was also hoping for that but the third was just too easy

[hous]

I also had: 1. LR 2.RC 3.LR 4.LR 5.LG

Obviously, one of the first 2 LR's are experimental. The 2nd LR section (Section 3/5) was MUCH easier and "normal" than the first section. The Socrates section was the 4th/6 section and the first section was fairly odd. Some difficult questions were up at the begining (unusual) and one or a few parralel questions were up front too (I think). I hope the 1st section was experimental because it was a lot more time consuming. It was unusual so I hope that confirms it. As for the different forms, yes there are different forms but if someone has the 3 LR sections in the order that I stated above, then there is the sections are in the same order. I am also pretty sure that there are a few "odd ball" ordered tests but it seems like all of us have the standard forms.

(Please let the first section be experimental!!!)

Also, what do you guys think the grading scale will be? -10=170?

The first was not the experimenetal. I was also hoping for that but the third was just too easy

Which were on the third, I dont remember. I remember it being easy though.

[pamplona]

I had blood pressure and brain computer, but no Newton/gravitational force.
1: LR 2: LR 3:RC 4:LR 5:LG (I think)

Was this a hard test? My brain is so dead I kinda can't even tell.

[MMaldonado]

Definitely. The guy next to me started with a different section than I did, with LG, but I had LR for 1, 2, and 3, then LG, then RC.

I will have a joy-gasm if I have 3 LR sections when I take the test in December. It IS brutal opening the test with all 3 LR sections though. I bet you felt like you were floating around in Purgatory at that point, didn't you?

[moontavern22]

nothing about Newton on mine...there seems to be consensus about a LR section with 26 questions, and for me that would be the 3rd section was the real one....I had LR RC LR LR LG...

[idespisethelsat]

Nothing about Newton for me as well. Again, RC was my experimental.

One of my LR's also had a formal logic question about poetry and originality or something that was the last question of a section (no.26 I believe)

[gk101]

I had LR, RC, LR, LR, LG ( my second worst nightmare come true) The second LR had 26 questions, please tell me that was the experimental.. I was not confident on that section

[gemadness]

I had LR in 1 3 and 4 also

I really thought 3 was experimental because the questions were really long and some were tough

[lsatcracker]

so if the 3rd section (2nd lr) is expr. then the 2 real lr sections had 25 questions each and 27rc and 23lg... so this was a 100 question test. do we agree?