The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread Forum
-
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2017 5:01 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
How nice of John Marshall Law School in Atlanta (first thought..."there's one in Atlanta too?") to send me an LSAT pack complete with 2 pencils, sharpener, eraser, and gallon bag. Just in time for....2 days after the test.
-
- Posts: 223
- Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2017 4:40 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
I thought it was already confirmed that some people had different orders of their LR experimentals?Zero Hedge wrote:That was my format and I haven’t heard of anyone who had that as well that didn’t have their experimental in the second LR.mmart207 wrote:I'm really hoping that this is not true. I had LR, RC, LR, LR, LG and I'm really hoping that the first section was the LR experimentalGnarMarBinx wrote:I know some people had a different LR experimental, but from what I remember I was under the impression that they were all in the third section. Not sure if that's true, though. Also, I do know that they were all LR, LG, LR, LR, RC in their format, although some had 2 26 question sections and some had 2 25 question sections.Zero Hedge wrote:I had the same as you but I do believe that others were given a completely different experimental LR. I'm not aware of whether they still had the same order (LR-RC-LR-LR-LG), but I have seen several LR questions mentioned on here/reddit that I didn't see on my experimental LR section.GnarMarBinx wrote:Anyone know whether the people after the Sept LSAT all had the same experimental section number for LR? I had three LR's in Sept and theee again for this test. In September, my 2nd LR (but third section) was experimental. Did anyone else have a different experimental LR section number than that, or did all the tests wth 3 LR sections have the 2nd LR as experimental?
- JamesBlahDeBlah
- Posts: 200
- Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2017 12:35 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
They got a hold of your test...you'll be needing those supplies later ;-pvikingrunner wrote:How nice of John Marshall Law School in Atlanta (first thought..."there's one in Atlanta too?") to send me an LSAT pack complete with 2 pencils, sharpener, eraser, and gallon bag. Just in time for....2 days after the test.
Last edited by JamesBlahDeBlah on Fri Jan 26, 2018 10:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- sabraph
- Posts: 158
- Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2017 2:55 am
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
secondedetramak wrote:Caligula can go to hell
- sabraph
- Posts: 158
- Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2017 2:55 am
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
best Christmas present everMediocreAtBest wrote:What’s frustrating is that LSAC used to regularly release December scores before Christmas. The past however many years have all been in January. Not to mention that September and June scores were only released a day before the projected date.
So don’t hold your breath for a December release, it’ll prob be on the projected date.
...but how cool would a Dec. 22 release be?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2017 5:01 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
pls no.JamesBlahDeBlah wrote:They got a hold of your test...you'll be needing those supplies later ;-pvikingrunner wrote:How nice of John Marshall Law School in Atlanta (first thought..."there's one in Atlanta too?") to send me an LSAT pack complete with 2 pencils, sharpener, eraser, and gallon bag. Just in time for....2 days after the test.
-
- Posts: 779
- Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2016 7:08 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
.
Last edited by littlewing67 on Fri Dec 08, 2017 5:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Zero Hedge
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2017 11:20 am
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
.
That was my format and I haven’t heard of anyone who had that as well that didn’t have their experimental in the second LR.[/quote]
I thought it was already confirmed that some people had different orders of their LR experimentals?[/quote]
Totally possible. I just haven't seen/heard of anyone who did, but I'll take your word for it. I know other's had LR-LG-LR-LR-RC and I believe their experimental was still the second LR. I assumed that perhaps this was where the different version of the experimental LR came in to play, albeit in the same position as our own. Mayors and tilapia are the key to figuring it out.
Edit: Broke quote my b
That was my format and I haven’t heard of anyone who had that as well that didn’t have their experimental in the second LR.[/quote]
I thought it was already confirmed that some people had different orders of their LR experimentals?[/quote]
Totally possible. I just haven't seen/heard of anyone who did, but I'll take your word for it. I know other's had LR-LG-LR-LR-RC and I believe their experimental was still the second LR. I assumed that perhaps this was where the different version of the experimental LR came in to play, albeit in the same position as our own. Mayors and tilapia are the key to figuring it out.
Edit: Broke quote my b
- GnarMarBinx
- Posts: 140
- Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2017 3:21 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
I thought it was already confirmed that some people had different orders of their LR experimentals?[/quote]Zero Hedge wrote:.
That was my format and I haven’t heard of anyone who had that as well that didn’t have their experimental in the second LR.
Totally possible. I just haven't seen/heard of anyone who did, but I'll take your word for it. I know other's had LR-LG-LR-LR-RC and I believe their experimental was still the second LR. I assumed that perhaps this was where the different version of the experimental LR came in to play, albeit in the same position as our own. Mayors and tilapia are the key to figuring it out.
Edit: Broke quote my b[/quote]
Yeah, I'm not sure. I had LR (25) RC LR (25) LR (26) LG and I'm still struggling to remember if the mayoral question and movie review question were in my first or second LR... It's weird because I thought before anyone told me they were in the same section, that the mayor prodevelopment question was in the first LR and the movie review was in the 2nd LR - but that's obviously false because they're both either in the first or 2nd LR. I'm so confused and just praying that my 2nd LR is the experimental because that's the one I felt the worst on (and people are saying it's likely the experimental).
- eraserhead
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2017 12:02 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
Totally possible. I just haven't seen/heard of anyone who did, but I'll take your word for it. I know other's had LR-LG-LR-LR-RC and I believe their experimental was still the second LR. I assumed that perhaps this was where the different version of the experimental LR came in to play, albeit in the same position as our own. Mayors and tilapia are the key to figuring it out.GnarMarBinx wrote:I thought it was already confirmed that some people had different orders of their LR experimentals?Zero Hedge wrote:.
That was my format and I haven’t heard of anyone who had that as well that didn’t have their experimental in the second LR.
Edit: Broke quote my b[/quote]
Yeah, I'm not sure. I had LR (25) RC LR (25) LR (26) LG and I'm still struggling to remember if the mayoral question and movie review question were in my first or second LR... It's weird because I thought before anyone told me they were in the same section, that the mayor prodevelopment question was in the first LR and the movie review was in the 2nd LR - but that's obviously false because they're both either in the first or 2nd LR. I'm so confused and just praying that my 2nd LR is the experimental because that's the one I felt the worst on (and people are saying it's likely the experimental).[/quote]
It's not true that everyone's experimental was in the same section. I can speak to that. The ceo of power score spoke to that. Appealing to authority while it may not make sense in lr does make sense here. I had LR RC LR LR LG and my experimental was in LR1. I had the mayor question and the movie question in LR2. And tilapia in LR3. For me LR2/LR3 were real. LR 1 was not. I remember the mayor question after RC because I felt a lot better about the lr2 questions than I did lr1.
- GnarMarBinx
- Posts: 140
- Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2017 3:21 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
Yeah, I'm not sure. I had LR (25) RC LR (25) LR (26) LG and I'm still struggling to remember if the mayoral question and movie review question were in my first or second LR... It's weird because I thought before anyone told me they were in the same section, that the mayor prodevelopment question was in the first LR and the movie review was in the 2nd LR - but that's obviously false because they're both either in the first or 2nd LR. I'm so confused and just praying that my 2nd LR is the experimental because that's the one I felt the worst on (and people are saying it's likely the experimental).[/quote]eraserhead wrote:Totally possible. I just haven't seen/heard of anyone who did, but I'll take your word for it. I know other's had LR-LG-LR-LR-RC and I believe their experimental was still the second LR. I assumed that perhaps this was where the different version of the experimental LR came in to play, albeit in the same position as our own. Mayors and tilapia are the key to figuring it out.GnarMarBinx wrote:I thought it was already confirmed that some people had different orders of their LR experimentals?Zero Hedge wrote:.
That was my format and I haven’t heard of anyone who had that as well that didn’t have their experimental in the second LR.
Edit: Broke quote my b
It's not true that everyone's experimental was in the same section. I can speak to that. The ceo of power score spoke to that. Appealing to authority while it may not make sense in lr does make sense here. I had LR RC LR LR LG and my experimental was in LR1. I had the mayor question and the movie question in LR2. And tilapia in LR3. For me LR2/LR3 were real. LR 1 was not. I remember the mayor question after RC because I felt a lot better about the lr2 questions than I did lr1.[/quote]
Well, here's to hoping you're right about yourself, and my experimental was in the second section!
- GnarMarBinx
- Posts: 140
- Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2017 3:21 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
Kill it, and good luck, Lilwing!!littlewing67 wrote:I'm applying for jobs and have an interview today Wish me luck y'all.
-
- Posts: 223
- Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2017 4:40 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
Yeah, I'm not sure. I had LR (25) RC LR (25) LR (26) LG and I'm still struggling to remember if the mayoral question and movie review question were in my first or second LR... It's weird because I thought before anyone told me they were in the same section, that the mayor prodevelopment question was in the first LR and the movie review was in the 2nd LR - but that's obviously false because they're both either in the first or 2nd LR. I'm so confused and just praying that my 2nd LR is the experimental because that's the one I felt the worst on (and people are saying it's likely the experimental).[/quote]eraserhead wrote:Totally possible. I just haven't seen/heard of anyone who did, but I'll take your word for it. I know other's had LR-LG-LR-LR-RC and I believe their experimental was still the second LR. I assumed that perhaps this was where the different version of the experimental LR came in to play, albeit in the same position as our own. Mayors and tilapia are the key to figuring it out.GnarMarBinx wrote:I thought it was already confirmed that some people had different orders of their LR experimentals?Zero Hedge wrote:.
That was my format and I haven’t heard of anyone who had that as well that didn’t have their experimental in the second LR.
Edit: Broke quote my b
It's not true that everyone's experimental was in the same section. I can speak to that. The ceo of power score spoke to that. Appealing to authority while it may not make sense in lr does make sense here. I had LR RC LR LR LG and my experimental was in LR1. I had the mayor question and the movie question in LR2. And tilapia in LR3. For me LR2/LR3 were real. LR 1 was not. I remember the mayor question after RC because I felt a lot better about the lr2 questions than I did lr1.[/quote]
I do not remember which sections I had the mayoral or tilapia. It's all a blur at this point. But I kind of feel like they weren't in my first section. Which I'm hoping because my first section (LR1) was my worst. I'm hoping the first section was my experimental as well
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- strawberryrhubarb
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Sun May 28, 2017 4:10 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
IT IS already confirmed. Not to be a prick because I know you're just nervous and are trying to be 100% sure about the placement of your experimental LR. But this person said they haven't heard of anyone who had the same section order and didn't have LR2 as experimental. You're going to law school-- someone saying they haven't heard of it, does not mean it isn't the case or can't be the case. You have to breathe! Hopefully for the last time, let's confirm ---> two people with the section order (ex LR RC LR LR LG) can and do have their experimental in a different section. People on this very forum have confirmed that as well as people on reddit. More importantly it's happened in past tests. I would say that if you're fairly confident that your experimental was LR1, take comfort in why you think that. If you're unsure, try to seek clarification but definitely don't base it on what people have or haven't heard.mmart207 wrote:I thought it was already confirmed that some people had different orders of their LR experimentals?Zero Hedge wrote:That was my format and I haven’t heard of anyone who had that as well that didn’t have their experimental in the second LR.mmart207 wrote:I'm really hoping that this is not true. I had LR, RC, LR, LR, LG and I'm really hoping that the first section was the LR experimentalGnarMarBinx wrote:I know some people had a different LR experimental, but from what I remember I was under the impression that they were all in the third section. Not sure if that's true, though. Also, I do know that they were all LR, LG, LR, LR, RC in their format, although some had 2 26 question sections and some had 2 25 question sections.Zero Hedge wrote:I had the same as you but I do believe that others were given a completely different experimental LR. I'm not aware of whether they still had the same order (LR-RC-LR-LR-LG), but I have seen several LR questions mentioned on here/reddit that I didn't see on my experimental LR section.GnarMarBinx wrote:Anyone know whether the people after the Sept LSAT all had the same experimental section number for LR? I had three LR's in Sept and theee again for this test. In September, my 2nd LR (but third section) was experimental. Did anyone else have a different experimental LR section number than that, or did all the tests wth 3 LR sections have the 2nd LR as experimental?
- Rupert Pupkin
- Posts: 2170
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:21 am
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
Good Luck! You got thisGnarMarBinx wrote:Kill it, and good luck, Lilwing!!littlewing67 wrote:I'm applying for jobs and have an interview today Wish me luck y'all.
-
- Posts: 779
- Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2016 7:08 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
.
Last edited by littlewing67 on Fri Dec 08, 2017 5:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 779
- Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2016 7:08 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
.
Last edited by littlewing67 on Fri Dec 08, 2017 5:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Rupert Pupkin
- Posts: 2170
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:21 am
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
lol WOW LSAC making moves....littlewing67 wrote:hmmm this should be interestingComing Sunday December 10th: a new look to your LSAC account!
- JamesBlahDeBlah
- Posts: 200
- Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2017 12:35 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
This...this could change grey day forever!Rupert Pupkin wrote:lol WOW LSAC making moves....littlewing67 wrote:hmmm this should be interestingComing Sunday December 10th: a new look to your LSAC account!
Last edited by JamesBlahDeBlah on Fri Jan 26, 2018 10:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Zero Hedge
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2017 11:20 am
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
Hypothetical: LSAC botches rollout of new site and can't find out how to properly display everyone's scores on grey day.JamesBlahDeBlah wrote:This...this could change grey day forever!Rupert Pupkin wrote:lol WOW LSAC making moves....littlewing67 wrote:hmmm this should be interestingComing Sunday December 10th: a new look to your LSAC account!
- Experiment626
- Posts: 811
- Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2017 9:43 am
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
Even better, everyone's previous data is lost.Zero Hedge wrote:Hypothetical: LSAC botches rollout of new site and can't find out how to properly display everyone's scores on grey day.JamesBlahDeBlah wrote:This...this could change grey day forever!Rupert Pupkin wrote:lol WOW LSAC making moves....littlewing67 wrote:hmmm this should be interestingComing Sunday December 10th: a new look to your LSAC account!
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2017 4:14 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
Are any of y'all canceling your December test? Why or why not LOL
- Experiment626
- Posts: 811
- Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2017 9:43 am
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
Nope. I may be nervous about my flub costing me 2 questions, but that's not a reason to cancel. Unless you're gunning for HYS or you had some super horrible test experience, why cancel. You already did it, get the score on record.damask_rain wrote:Are any of y'all canceling your December test? Why or why not LOL
-
- Posts: 491
- Joined: Mon May 08, 2017 1:16 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
GL everybody. Hope to see y'all in the c/o 2021 thread in January.
-
- Posts: 779
- Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2016 7:08 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
.
Last edited by littlewing67 on Fri Dec 08, 2017 5:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login