I was in partial shock that it wasn't a weird game. I did my best to PWN those first three expecting to need ALL THE TIME IN THE WORLD to do the last one because it was going to be weird since I usually needed 2 extra minutes to go -0 when a weird game was thrown in on my PTs.dm1683 wrote:I was the exact opposite. I mouthed "Yes!!!" to myself as I saw the last game because I suck at weird games and knew it was likely that I would go -0/-1 in LG, which I think I did.devilsadvocatetroll wrote:I was literally waiting for the 4th game to be super experimental cause of all the time I had then when it wasn't I knew this test wasn't gonna go well.augustyyy wrote:same same same heredevilsadvocatetroll wrote:Games is my best section. Talent completely wasted on this joke of an LG section. Finished with 10 minutes to spare.
RC is my worst section. Got shat on by LSAC.
2 LRs were a joke, but the 25q LR which apparently was real was my 5th section and I got pwned by fatigue.
Is this thread the best support group for LSAC induced depression?
LG is always my best I was hoping for a hard one to push down the curve and to offset my mistakes in RC
guess not going to happen
June 2017 Waiters Thread- Grayday! -9 curve. GL all Forum
- Experiment626
- Posts: 811
- Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2017 9:43 am
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
- MediocreAtBest
- Posts: 632
- Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2017 2:51 pm
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
There were 2 good looking people at my test center today...they were both guys, so it didn't do much for me lol.dm1683 wrote:IDK either, but one of the hot guys had a Patriots jersey on. WE'RE IN WISCONSIN! Like WTF man?vtdelt wrote:I don't know if it's good or bad you had eye candy. I'm glad I only had 1 other person in the room with me and he was not even a drunk goggles/wasted face/blackout drunk fuckdm1683 wrote:No specific stories, but damn the guys who were taking the test at my center were surprisingly attractive, in a fratty douchebro sort of way. Most of the girls were also super pretty. I felt inadequate LOL.Walliums wrote:Oooh! Apparently some lady at the front of the building was confiscating highlighters. Scandal! One of our proctors had to go down and get a number of highlighters from her.roflsat wrote:Anybody have any fun test center stories/nightmares today?
There was also this one guy in my section who was just, oh my. I guess airhead would be a kind enough description.
- Experiment626
- Posts: 811
- Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2017 9:43 am
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
who says some of us aren't already back from getting wasted or in transition?Mikey wrote:You guys are still alive, congrats
Now get off TLS and go get wasted af
- Experiment626
- Posts: 811
- Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2017 9:43 am
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
Slippin' Jimmy wrote:Heading to the liquor store now, probably going Vodka tonight.Mikey wrote:You guys are still alive, congrats
Now get off TLS and go get wasted af
Already done bourbon and beer... Debating if I should be done since I've ate or should continue. I have tomorrow off from work because I planned for worst case scenario thinking I bombed and would get blackout but that didn't happen so I'm like do I keep drinking or just call it a night and get up and "surprise i'm working today bitches" to my co-workers tomorrow.
-
- Posts: 753
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2016 9:57 pm
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
Any attraction I had to him was nullified by his gross display of affection for an enemy team.MediocreAtBest wrote:There were 2 good looking people at my test center today...they were both guys, so it didn't do much for me lol.dm1683 wrote:IDK either, but one of the hot guys had a Patriots jersey on. WE'RE IN WISCONSIN! Like WTF man?vtdelt wrote:I don't know if it's good or bad you had eye candy. I'm glad I only had 1 other person in the room with me and he was not even a drunk goggles/wasted face/blackout drunk fuckdm1683 wrote:No specific stories, but damn the guys who were taking the test at my center were surprisingly attractive, in a fratty douchebro sort of way. Most of the girls were also super pretty. I felt inadequate LOL.Walliums wrote:Oooh! Apparently some lady at the front of the building was confiscating highlighters. Scandal! One of our proctors had to go down and get a number of highlighters from her.roflsat wrote:Anybody have any fun test center stories/nightmares today?
There was also this one guy in my section who was just, oh my. I guess airhead would be a kind enough description.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Experiment626
- Posts: 811
- Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2017 9:43 am
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
A. Nony Mouse wrote:People: if another mod posted this, sorry for the duplication, but because I've had to edit a bunch of posts already:
do NOT post anything about a specific answer you gave, including how many of whatever letter you had in a row
do NOT post anything about the nature of a question (like the kind of logical principle implicated or the kind of game). Topic is okay, but not the kind.
From after this message anyone posting these things will be banned. This is your only warning.
(For the record: TLS enforces this because LSAC monitors this site and will threaten cease-and-desist letters if we don't, and also you agreed not to disclose the test questions, and this is how LSAC understands it. Thanks.)
Thank you for letting us know. If I violated after this post, I didn't read this post yet as I was responding in real time as I was reading and catching up. I will do my best to try and edit my posts after this to remove, albeit drunk. Please don't ban me if I did between your post and this response....
Last edited by Experiment626 on Mon Jun 12, 2017 9:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 319
- Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2014 8:32 pm
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
.
Last edited by NavyNuke on Sun Nov 12, 2017 6:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Experiment626
- Posts: 811
- Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2017 9:43 am
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
NavyNuke wrote:When we get our scores do we get a breakdown by section?
Think the estimate was July 6th for results but apparently the trend has been earlier than the estimate.
- zkyggi
- Posts: 281
- Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2017 12:14 am
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
Finally done.
I had an experimental LG for my second section and damn near resigned myself to a retake. Luckily, the real LG was mind-numbingly easy compar d to the experimental. LR was good, I had enough time to take a bathroom break after finishing and come back with 2 mins left. RC is a toss up for me; could be a -0 or a -8 and I wouldn't be surprised.
Right now, anything above a 165 seems fair game. This wait will be brutal, but I'm glad it is over (for the time being).
I had an experimental LG for my second section and damn near resigned myself to a retake. Luckily, the real LG was mind-numbingly easy compar d to the experimental. LR was good, I had enough time to take a bathroom break after finishing and come back with 2 mins left. RC is a toss up for me; could be a -0 or a -8 and I wouldn't be surprised.
Right now, anything above a 165 seems fair game. This wait will be brutal, but I'm glad it is over (for the time being).
Last edited by zkyggi on Sat Jan 27, 2018 8:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Jack_Kelly
- Posts: 900
- Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2017 12:52 am
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
I don't think I ever got a breakdown by section for February? How do I see this? My response sheet is blankvtdelt wrote:NavyNuke wrote:When we get our scores do we get a breakdown by section?
Think the estimate was July 6th for results but apparently the trend has been earlier than the estimate.
- Mint-Berry_Crunch
- Posts: 5816
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2015 1:20 am
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
Feb doesn't give you a break down for all other test you see exactly what you put and what tcr isJack_Kelly wrote:I don't think I ever got a breakdown by section for February? How do I see this? My response sheet is blankvtdelt wrote:NavyNuke wrote:When we get our scores do we get a breakdown by section?
Think the estimate was July 6th for results but apparently the trend has been earlier than the estimate.
-
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Tue May 16, 2017 9:03 am
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
June you get the response sheet back as wellJack_Kelly wrote:I don't think I ever got a breakdown by section for February? How do I see this? My response sheet is blankvtdelt wrote:NavyNuke wrote:When we get our scores do we get a breakdown by section?
Think the estimate was July 6th for results but apparently the trend has been earlier than the estimate.
- Platopus
- Posts: 1507
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 11:20 pm
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
Really disappointed to find out which RC was real for me, damn. Shit was brutal. LR and LG was super easy though, so hopefully I can make up for it. RC was just a bear though.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- augustyyy
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2016 12:36 am
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
you get everything, the responses and correct answers and scans of your scantron and your writing sampleNavyNuke wrote:When we get our scores do we get a breakdown by section?
- Experiment626
- Posts: 811
- Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2017 9:43 am
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
Literally my score hinges on RC...Platopus wrote:Really disappointed to find out which RC was real for me, damn. Shit was brutal. LR and LG was super easy though, so hopefully I can make up for it. RC was just a bear though.
- Jack_Kelly
- Posts: 900
- Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2017 12:52 am
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
Ah, alright. Why is that exactly? I suspect I missed ~15 AR in Feb, would like to see.Mint-Berry_Crunch wrote:Feb doesn't give you a break down for all other test you see exactly what you put and what tcr isJack_Kelly wrote:I don't think I ever got a breakdown by section for February? How do I see this? My response sheet is blankvtdelt wrote:NavyNuke wrote:When we get our scores do we get a breakdown by section?
Think the estimate was July 6th for results but apparently the trend has been earlier than the estimate.
- Mint-Berry_Crunch
- Posts: 5816
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2015 1:20 am
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
The worst thing for me is RC can be either -1 or -8
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 753
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2016 9:57 pm
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
Me too. I didn't have any questions where I was like "I know i'm getting this wrong" but there definitely were a few iffy ones. Especially in the second passage.zkyggi wrote:Finally done.
I had an experimental LG for my second section and damn near resigned myself to a retake. Luckily, the real LG was mind-numbingly easy compar d to the experimental. LR was good, I had enough time to take a bathroom break after finishing and come back with 2 mins left. RC is a toss up for me; could be a -0 or a -8 and I wouldn't be surprised.
Right now, anything above a 165 seems fair game. This wait will be brutal, but I'm glad it is over (for the time being).
There's no way you got 165 my friend. You were PTing at like 176 or something and you had like 7 section tests in there.
Overall it's pretty clear we're both overthinking and doubting our RC too much. Pretty standard for after tests. I think we'll be fine - you'll get your 177, I'll get my 173, and we'll be on our way to the t6!
- Mint-Berry_Crunch
- Posts: 5816
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2015 1:20 am
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
I think they reserve them for other tests they have to give, like for makeups or somethingJack_Kelly wrote:Ah, alright. Why is that exactly? I suspect I missed ~15 AR in Feb, would like to see.Mint-Berry_Crunch wrote:Feb doesn't give you a break down for all other test you see exactly what you put and what tcr isJack_Kelly wrote:I don't think I ever got a breakdown by section for February? How do I see this? My response sheet is blankvtdelt wrote:NavyNuke wrote:When we get our scores do we get a breakdown by section?
Think the estimate was July 6th for results but apparently the trend has been earlier than the estimate.
-
- Posts: 753
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2016 9:57 pm
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
Seems 'to be the consensus around here that performance on RC is uncertain. For me I know a couple answers were iffy, but I should come out OK.Mint-Berry_Crunch wrote:The worst thing for me is RC can be either -1 or -8
- Platopus
- Posts: 1507
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 11:20 pm
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
Yeah, same here, everything on RC just felt "uncertain", whereas I'm pretty sure I killed my RC experimental... I wouldn't be surprised if I scored either a 158 or a 178, I'd be really surprised if I scored 172-174dm1683 wrote:Me too. I didn't have any questions where I was like "I know i'm getting this wrong" but there definitely were a few iffy ones. Especially in the second passage.zkyggi wrote:Finally done.
I had an experimental LG for my second section and damn near resigned myself to a retake. Luckily, the real LG was mind-numbingly easy compar d to the experimental. LR was good, I had enough time to take a bathroom break after finishing and come back with 2 mins left. RC is a toss up for me; could be a -0 or a -8 and I wouldn't be surprised.
Right now, anything above a 165 seems fair game. This wait will be brutal, but I'm glad it is over (for the time being).
There's no way you got 165 my friend. You were PTing at like 176 or something and you had like 7 section tests in there.
Overall it's pretty clear we're both overthinking and doubting our RC too much. Pretty standard for after tests. I think we'll be fine - you'll get your 177, I'll get my 173, and we'll be on our way to the t6!
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- calmike
- Posts: 317
- Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2013 1:40 pm
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
I'm just glad I didn't get banned :.....)calmike wrote:I remember seeing that too. SighNtp73821 wrote:mod edit: don't talk about what answers you gave/had in a row
mod edit: is there a reason you thought it was a good idea to quote the mod-deleted post? don't talk about this
-
- Posts: 753
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2016 9:57 pm
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
It's probably not as bad as you think. I prefer to stay positive. In my opinion our worries about RC are likely overblown. You and I will be classmates at Chicago in 2018.Platopus wrote:Really disappointed to find out which RC was real for me, damn. Shit was brutal. LR and LG was super easy though, so hopefully I can make up for it. RC was just a bear though.
- Mint-Berry_Crunch
- Posts: 5816
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2015 1:20 am
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
I keep feeling insecure, but then I remember that when I did the section I was able to find support for most Qs....dm1683 wrote:Seems 'to be the consensus around here that performance on RC is uncertain. For me I know a couple answers were iffy, but I should come out OK.Mint-Berry_Crunch wrote:The worst thing for me is RC can be either -1 or -8
- Jack_Kelly
- Posts: 900
- Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2017 12:52 am
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
The LR I was hoping was real was experimental and vice versa. Fuck.
Last edited by Jack_Kelly on Mon Jun 12, 2017 9:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login