Page 1 of 1
Retaking from 2010, what PTs are still relevant?
Posted: Mon May 15, 2017 9:14 am
by rahimali
I have the Powerscore books, the Manny Books and all of the old (10 more actual..) test books. I'm just wondering whether PT# 20-40 are still going to be helpful for me. I'm looking to take at least 25 PTs before I take the LSAT in December.
Thanks
Re: Retaking from 2010, what PTs are still relevant?
Posted: Mon May 15, 2017 9:31 am
by VeiledProtectorate
LG and LR are pretty different in the 19-28 book. I used them but I had done 40+ PTs by the time I got to them. 29-38 are pretty good though imo. However, if you're shooting for 25-30 full PTs there are better tests. I'd go through the 52-71 books, and the individual 72-80 tests before doing 29-38. I'd use 19-28 as drilling material.
Re: Retaking from 2010, what PTs are still relevant?
Posted: Mon May 15, 2017 9:59 am
by Mikey
All PTs are still relevant. Even if LR and RC has changed from older PTs, the old ones are still relevant for non-PT practice.
Get the most recent 25 though, I'd say.
Re: Retaking from 2010, what PTs are still relevant?
Posted: Mon May 15, 2017 11:34 am
by rahimali
thanks fellas.
Re: Retaking from 2010, what PTs are still relevant?
Posted: Tue May 16, 2017 3:03 pm
by hushpuppy
VeiledProtectorate wrote:LG and LR are pretty different in the 19-28 book. I used them but I had done 40+ PTs by the time I got to them. 29-38 are pretty good though imo. However, if you're shooting for 25-30 full PTs there are better tests. I'd go through the 52-71 books, and the individual 72-80 tests before doing 29-38. I'd use 19-28 as drilling material.
Are you guys talking about the PTs that you buy 10 at a time on Amazon, etc.? Like "10 Actual, Official LSAT PrepTests Volume V: PrepTests 62 through 71 (Lsat Series)?" Thanks!
Re: Retaking from 2010, what PTs are still relevant?
Posted: Tue May 16, 2017 3:04 pm
by maybeman
Mikey wrote:All PTs are still relevant.