Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=277085
Okay, sounds like we're on the same page. Definitely check on 7sage on youtube, it's free and absolutely the best study resource for LG.conker wrote:Yes. Kind of like how someone might ask the same question about written LSAT study material, and one would probably point them to PowerScore books, and away from some other terrible ones, like Princeton Review.
So, I appreciate your contribution. I recall having heard the 7 Sage name thrown around before.
I'm not sure how useful solely listening to LG explanations will be if @Conker is planning on driving though, lol. Don't kill anyone (or yourself) by trying to LSAT and drive.Platopus wrote:Okay, sounds like we're on the same page. Definitely check on 7sage on youtube, it's free and absolutely the best study resource for LG.conker wrote:Yes. Kind of like how someone might ask the same question about written LSAT study material, and one would probably point them to PowerScore books, and away from some other terrible ones, like Princeton Review.
So, I appreciate your contribution. I recall having heard the 7 Sage name thrown around before.
How did these guys, with a 176 and 179, respectively end up at George Washington and UC Hastings???mtf612 wrote:The Thinking LSAT Podcast is an invaluable resource with well over 100 hours of material.
Well, Nathan talks a lot about his low uGPA. He also didn't really care to be an attorney. Ben, I'm not so certain. I'd imagine it was a mixture of cost, uGPA, location, etc.Platopus wrote:How did these guys, with a 176 and 179, respectively end up at George Washington and UC Hastings???mtf612 wrote:The Thinking LSAT Podcast is an invaluable resource with well over 100 hours of material.
Low GPA aside, unless we're talking sub 2.0, with those scores you can still pull lower end of T20 at full rides.mtf612 wrote:Well, Nathan talks a lot about his low uGPA. He also didn't really care to be an attorney. Ben, I'm not so certain. I'd imagine it was a mixture of cost, uGPA, location, etc.Platopus wrote:How did these guys, with a 176 and 179, respectively end up at George Washington and UC Hastings???mtf612 wrote:The Thinking LSAT Podcast is an invaluable resource with well over 100 hours of material.
Hell, a 179 might be enough to pull some full rides from T-14 like NorthwesternTWiiX wrote:Low GPA aside, unless we're talking sub 2.0, with those scores you can still pull lower end of T20 at full rides.mtf612 wrote:Well, Nathan talks a lot about his low uGPA. He also didn't really care to be an attorney. Ben, I'm not so certain. I'd imagine it was a mixture of cost, uGPA, location, etc.Platopus wrote:How did these guys, with a 176 and 179, respectively end up at George Washington and UC Hastings???mtf612 wrote:The Thinking LSAT Podcast is an invaluable resource with well over 100 hours of material.
Yeah in the mid 2.x range for sure. Even with a 2.0 flat and a 179 you'd still get into WUSTL with a full ridePlatopus wrote:Hell, a 179 might be enough to pull some full rides from T-14 like NorthwesternTWiiX wrote:Low GPA aside, unless we're talking sub 2.0, with those scores you can still pull lower end of T20 at full rides.mtf612 wrote:Well, Nathan talks a lot about his low uGPA. He also didn't really care to be an attorney. Ben, I'm not so certain. I'd imagine it was a mixture of cost, uGPA, location, etc.Platopus wrote:How did these guys, with a 176 and 179, respectively end up at George Washington and UC Hastings???mtf612 wrote:The Thinking LSAT Podcast is an invaluable resource with well over 100 hours of material.