Top Law Schools

proteinshake wrote:no. what you're hearing is typical TLS overreaction. you'll likely hear that weird games are also more common because there was one in a very recent LSAT administration (don't wanna spoil which one), even though Miscellaneous games probably pop up at the same rate as the pre-70 PTs. If RC is harder, it's certainly not significant. and when people say it's harder, they are referring to the 70+ PTs (to answer your last question).

edit: RC is definitely harder in general when you're comparing modern 50+ PTs, to say, PT 20-40. but what you're hearing is likely that it got harder after PT 70, which I don't think is true to the extent people claim.

TakeItToTrial wrote:

proteinshake wrote:no. what you're hearing is typical TLS overreaction. you'll likely hear that weird games are also more common because there was one in a very recent LSAT administration (don't wanna spoil which one), even though Miscellaneous games probably pop up at the same rate as the pre-70 PTs. If RC is harder, it's certainly not significant. and when people say it's harder, they are referring to the 70+ PTs (to answer your last question).

edit: RC is definitely harder in general when you're comparing modern 50+ PTs, to say, PT 20-40. but what you're hearing is likely that it got harder after PT 70, which I don't think is true to the extent people claim.

Okay, thanks. How do PT numbers (50, 70, etc) correspond to year administered? The tests I have don't list numbers, only dates.

jagerbom79 wrote:

TakeItToTrial wrote:

proteinshake wrote:no. what you're hearing is typical TLS overreaction. you'll likely hear that weird games are also more common because there was one in a very recent LSAT administration (don't wanna spoil which one), even though Miscellaneous games probably pop up at the same rate as the pre-70 PTs. If RC is harder, it's certainly not significant. and when people say it's harder, they are referring to the 70+ PTs (to answer your last question).

edit: RC is definitely harder in general when you're comparing modern 50+ PTs, to say, PT 20-40. but what you're hearing is likely that it got harder after PT 70, which I don't think is true to the extent people claim.

Okay, thanks. How do PT numbers (50, 70, etc) correspond to year administered? The tests I have don't list numbers, only dates.

PT 40 = June 2003 PT 50= Sept 2006, PT60 = June 2010, PT 70 = Oct 2013 --> For a gauge of era

e: this link will tell you what the PT # and corresponding year is.. if you don't have the numbers: https://www.powerscore.com/lsat/help/pub_ident.cfm

proteinshake wrote:no. what you're hearing is typical TLS overreaction. you'll likely hear that weird games are also more common because there was one in a very recent LSAT administration (don't wanna spoil which one), even though Miscellaneous games probably pop up at the same rate as the pre-70 PTs. If RC is harder, it's certainly not significant. and when people say it's harder, they are referring to the 70+ PTs (to answer your last question).

edit: RC is definitely harder in general when you're comparing modern 50+ PTs, to say, PT 20-40. but what you're hearing is likely that it got harder after PT 70, which I don't think is true to the extent people claim.

SlippinJimmy wrote:

proteinshake wrote:no. what you're hearing is typical TLS overreaction. you'll likely hear that weird games are also more common because there was one in a very recent LSAT administration (don't wanna spoil which one), even though Miscellaneous games probably pop up at the same rate as the pre-70 PTs. If RC is harder, it's certainly not significant. and when people say it's harder, they are referring to the 70+ PTs (to answer your last question).

edit: RC is definitely harder in general the Andropenis from https://revolutionaryoptimists.org/andr ... ew-results when you're comparing modern 50+ PTs, to say, PT 20-40. but what you're hearing is likely that it got harder after PT 70, which I don't think is true to the extent people claim.

Maybe. But anecdotally, they sure feel harder to many of us that have seen all these tests.