June 2016 - Waiter's (+170 or bust) GRAY DAY HAS AWOKEN FROM ITS SLUMBER Forum

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
Post Reply

WHATS THE FUCKING CURVE

-11
21
21%
wats a curve
8
8%
-10
5
5%
-11
16
16%
-15
4
4%
-7
6
6%
JOSÉ CURVE-O
33
33%
-12
8
8%
 
Total votes: 101

User avatar
pretzeltime

Gold
Posts: 1993
Joined: Sat May 07, 2016 6:57 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust) NOSCORE F, S, S, MONDAY??!!

Post by pretzeltime » Mon Jun 27, 2016 3:49 pm

forum_user wrote:
pretzeltime wrote:Bleghhhhhhh the LSAT ain't gonna change in time for any (or most) of us, so idk why it's a point of huge interest. It's like the drinking age law. Once you turn 21 you stop caring about how bullshit it is.

Would rather debate about burgers/tacos
Wait--what about burgers/burritos
We can do that.

I'd pick burgers for sure, altho I do love a breakfast burrito.

etramak

Silver
Posts: 747
Joined: Sun May 22, 2016 11:58 am

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust) NOSCORE F, S, S, MONDAY??!!

Post by etramak » Mon Jun 27, 2016 3:49 pm

aur wrote:
pretzeltime wrote:Bleghhhhhhh the LSAT ain't gonna change in time for any (or most) of us, so idk why it's a point of huge interest. It's like the drinking age law. Once you turn 21 you stop caring about how bullshit it is.

Would rather debate about burgers/tacos
That's like picking a favorite child
A-are you saying that's something most moms DON'T do? :(

User avatar
pretzeltime

Gold
Posts: 1993
Joined: Sat May 07, 2016 6:57 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust) NOSCORE F, S, S, MONDAY??!!

Post by pretzeltime » Mon Jun 27, 2016 3:50 pm

Smallville wrote:
pretzeltime wrote:Bleghhhhhhh the LSAT ain't gonna change in time for any (or most) of us, so idk why it's a point of huge interest. It's like the drinking age law. Once you turn 21 you stop caring about how bullshit it is.

Would rather debate about burgers/tacos
eh I know plenty of people who thought the same back when the drinking age was 18 (or buying tobacco was 18) until the drinking age changed and screwed them all over again (or people could finally buy cigarettes and then suddenly couldnt)
Are you like 50 years old, who are these people you're referring to? Or was it recently changed in some specific state?

User avatar
aur

New
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2016 11:20 am

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust) NOSCORE F, S, S, MONDAY??!!

Post by aur » Mon Jun 27, 2016 3:50 pm

Post-LSAT all I wanted was a strawberry margarita and chicken tacos from this place down the street. Literally had been planning it out for days. Then my boyfriend decided to go to the gym after work and didn't get home in time for happy hour and I lost my ID so no margarita for me ): I'm a little embarrassed about how upset I got over that.

User avatar
rska884

Silver
Posts: 618
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 11:01 am

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust) NOSCORE FRIDAY

Post by rska884 » Mon Jun 27, 2016 3:51 pm

forum_user wrote:
rska884 wrote:
forum_user wrote:
rska884 wrote: OK, so it's unofficial. What happens if they get it wrong? Do you get refunded?

How many people are they hiring to man those phones? Do they already have the staff to coordinate this, or are they going to be relying on enough people spending $100 for an extra few hour head start on nothing to fund part time salaries for a large number of people?

I'm with Bird, I don't get why there's any need to spend large amounts of money and potentially inconvenience people by reducing the number of test centers and/or increasing the cost of administration. Sure, there are very unique one-off situations, but making changes to accommodate those at the expense of everyone else seems like a bad idea to me.

As anxious as y'all are, you get absolutely no benefit from learning early. Use this extra time to go find some Xanax or something.
If it's just an automated system they would need very little manpower, like you just call the hotline, dial in your LSAC number, and they list off your score. Sure there's no material benefit, but clearly the emotional cost isn't nil--and we are customers, after all. Law schools are already accepting the GRE which drew the scorn of LSAC but the support of pretty much every other accredited law school. They're going to have to start acting like they exist in a competitive marketplace eventually.
...you're going to take the GRE instead because they didn't give you your score fast enough?
[+] Spoiler
hurr
I mean, it's not a strawman - it's literally your argument. You said they should provide scores early (for a fee) in order to keep people from going to their competitor.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
aur

New
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2016 11:20 am

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust) NOSCORE F, S, S, MONDAY??!!

Post by aur » Mon Jun 27, 2016 3:52 pm

pretzeltime wrote:
forum_user wrote:
pretzeltime wrote:Bleghhhhhhh the LSAT ain't gonna change in time for any (or most) of us, so idk why it's a point of huge interest. It's like the drinking age law. Once you turn 21 you stop caring about how bullshit it is.

Would rather debate about burgers/tacos
Wait--what about burgers/burritos
We can do that.

I'd pick burgers for sure, altho I do love a breakfast burrito.
A good breakfast burrito is one of my favorite things ever. There's a place by me that only does them on weekends which is disappointing because they're practically life-changing.

brendanbcp

New
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2016 3:50 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust) NOSCORE F, S, S, MONDAY??!!

Post by brendanbcp » Mon Jun 27, 2016 3:52 pm

Keilz wrote:it's way too early to say it's not today, this is like not even the time it would go grey -_-
What time has it traditionally gone grey?

User avatar
pretzeltime

Gold
Posts: 1993
Joined: Sat May 07, 2016 6:57 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust) NOSCORE F, S, S, MONDAY??!!

Post by pretzeltime » Mon Jun 27, 2016 3:52 pm

brendanbcp wrote:
Keilz wrote:it's way too early to say it's not today, this is like not even the time it would go grey -_-
What time has it traditionally gone grey?
FFS

User avatar
Smallville

Gold
Posts: 4825
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2014 11:57 am

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust) NOSCORE F, S, S, MONDAY??!!

Post by Smallville » Mon Jun 27, 2016 3:53 pm

pretzeltime wrote:
Smallville wrote:
pretzeltime wrote:Bleghhhhhhh the LSAT ain't gonna change in time for any (or most) of us, so idk why it's a point of huge interest. It's like the drinking age law. Once you turn 21 you stop caring about how bullshit it is.

Would rather debate about burgers/tacos
eh I know plenty of people who thought the same back when the drinking age was 18 (or buying tobacco was 18) until the drinking age changed and screwed them all over again (or people could finally buy cigarettes and then suddenly couldnt)
Are you like 50 years old, who are these people you're referring to? Or was it recently changed in some specific state?
my age is irrelevant, point is just bc u reached the age where you can do specific things, doesn't mean that age restriction can't change when you "stop caring about how bullshit it is"

e: also yes obvi 50... what kind of person knows others older than themselves right?
Last edited by Smallville on Mon Jun 27, 2016 3:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
aur

New
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2016 11:20 am

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust) NOSCORE F, S, S, MONDAY??!!

Post by aur » Mon Jun 27, 2016 3:53 pm

etramak wrote:
aur wrote:
pretzeltime wrote:Bleghhhhhhh the LSAT ain't gonna change in time for any (or most) of us, so idk why it's a point of huge interest. It's like the drinking age law. Once you turn 21 you stop caring about how bullshit it is.

Would rather debate about burgers/tacos
That's like picking a favorite child
A-are you saying that's something most moms DON'T do? :(
I actually don't want to even think about parenting for at least 10 years

patttt

Silver
Posts: 516
Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2015 5:45 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust) NOSCORE F, S, S, MONDAY??!!

Post by patttt » Mon Jun 27, 2016 3:53 pm

brendanbcp wrote:
Keilz wrote:it's way too early to say it's not today, this is like not even the time it would go grey -_-
What time has it traditionally gone grey?
December was 4:30

User avatar
pretzeltime

Gold
Posts: 1993
Joined: Sat May 07, 2016 6:57 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust) NOSCORE F, S, S, MONDAY??!!

Post by pretzeltime » Mon Jun 27, 2016 3:54 pm

aur wrote:
pretzeltime wrote:
forum_user wrote:
pretzeltime wrote:Bleghhhhhhh the LSAT ain't gonna change in time for any (or most) of us, so idk why it's a point of huge interest. It's like the drinking age law. Once you turn 21 you stop caring about how bullshit it is.

Would rather debate about burgers/tacos
Wait--what about burgers/burritos
We can do that.

I'd pick burgers for sure, altho I do love a breakfast burrito.
A good breakfast burrito is one of my favorite things ever. There's a place by me that only does them on weekends which is disappointing because they're practically life-changing.
I also eat Whole Foods bean and cheese freezer burritos for breakfast all the time. With a lil' avocado. Tasty, delightful, sorta lowcal, nutritious

User avatar
forum_user

Silver
Posts: 844
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2015 9:40 am

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust) NOSCORE F, S, S, MONDAY??!!

Post by forum_user » Mon Jun 27, 2016 3:54 pm

aur wrote:
pretzeltime wrote:
forum_user wrote:
pretzeltime wrote:Bleghhhhhhh the LSAT ain't gonna change in time for any (or most) of us, so idk why it's a point of huge interest. It's like the drinking age law. Once you turn 21 you stop caring about how bullshit it is.

Would rather debate about burgers/tacos
Wait--what about burgers/burritos
We can do that.

I'd pick burgers for sure, altho I do love a breakfast burrito.
A good breakfast burrito is one of my favorite things ever. There's a place by me that only does them on weekends which is disappointing because they're practically life-changing.
Actually not a huge fan of breakfast burritos but I think burritos might be my favorite food overall

But Pret don't breakfast burritos have... eggs?

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
BirdLawExpert

Gold
Posts: 3135
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2015 6:09 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust) NOSCORE F, S, S, MONDAY??!!

Post by BirdLawExpert » Mon Jun 27, 2016 3:55 pm

pretzeltime wrote:
Smallville wrote:
pretzeltime wrote:Bleghhhhhhh the LSAT ain't gonna change in time for any (or most) of us, so idk why it's a point of huge interest. It's like the drinking age law. Once you turn 21 you stop caring about how bullshit it is.

Would rather debate about burgers/tacos
eh I know plenty of people who thought the same back when the drinking age was 18 (or buying tobacco was 18) until the drinking age changed and screwed them all over again (or people could finally buy cigarettes and then suddenly couldnt)
Are you like 50 years old, who are these people you're referring to? Or was it recently changed in some specific state?
Unless your parents are 30, you, too, know people who remember when the drinking age was 18. For your own sake I hope your reading comprehension isn't actually that poor.

User avatar
Thelaw23

Silver
Posts: 794
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2015 8:23 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust) NOSCORE F, S, S, MONDAY??!!

Post by Thelaw23 » Mon Jun 27, 2016 3:55 pm

pretzeltime wrote:
Smallville wrote:
pretzeltime wrote:Bleghhhhhhh the LSAT ain't gonna change in time for any (or most) of us, so idk why it's a point of huge interest. It's like the drinking age law. Once you turn 21 you stop caring about how bullshit it is.

Would rather debate about burgers/tacos
eh I know plenty of people who thought the same back when the drinking age was 18 (or buying tobacco was 18) until the drinking age changed and screwed them all over again (or people could finally buy cigarettes and then suddenly couldnt)
Are you like 50 years old, who are these people you're referring to? Or was it recently changed in some specific state?

I'm 22 and in New York they actually changed the cigarette-purchasing age to 21 after I turned 18 and could have legally bought them.

It was extremely annoying.

User avatar
rska884

Silver
Posts: 618
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 11:01 am

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust) NOSCORE F, S, S, MONDAY??!!

Post by rska884 » Mon Jun 27, 2016 3:55 pm

pretzeltime wrote:
Smallville wrote:
pretzeltime wrote:Bleghhhhhhh the LSAT ain't gonna change in time for any (or most) of us, so idk why it's a point of huge interest. It's like the drinking age law. Once you turn 21 you stop caring about how bullshit it is.

Would rather debate about burgers/tacos
eh I know plenty of people who thought the same back when the drinking age was 18 (or buying tobacco was 18) until the drinking age changed and screwed them all over again (or people could finally buy cigarettes and then suddenly couldnt)
Are you like 50 years old, who are these people you're referring to? Or was it recently changed in some specific state?
Yeah, wtf Smallville, do you have parents or relatives or family friends or something? Weirdo.

User avatar
pretzeltime

Gold
Posts: 1993
Joined: Sat May 07, 2016 6:57 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust) NOSCORE F, S, S, MONDAY??!!

Post by pretzeltime » Mon Jun 27, 2016 3:55 pm

Smallville wrote:
pretzeltime wrote:
Smallville wrote:
pretzeltime wrote:Bleghhhhhhh the LSAT ain't gonna change in time for any (or most) of us, so idk why it's a point of huge interest. It's like the drinking age law. Once you turn 21 you stop caring about how bullshit it is.

Would rather debate about burgers/tacos
eh I know plenty of people who thought the same back when the drinking age was 18 (or buying tobacco was 18) until the drinking age changed and screwed them all over again (or people could finally buy cigarettes and then suddenly couldnt)
Are you like 50 years old, who are these people you're referring to? Or was it recently changed in some specific state?
my age is irrelevant, point is just bc u reached the age where you can do specific things, doesn't mean that age restriction can't change when you "stop caring about how bullshit it is"

e: also yes obvi 50... what kind of person knows others older than themselves right?
I mean, of course it can change but I don't really see your point....

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
pretzeltime

Gold
Posts: 1993
Joined: Sat May 07, 2016 6:57 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust) NOSCORE F, S, S, MONDAY??!!

Post by pretzeltime » Mon Jun 27, 2016 3:56 pm

BirdLawExpert wrote:
pretzeltime wrote:
Smallville wrote:
pretzeltime wrote:Bleghhhhhhh the LSAT ain't gonna change in time for any (or most) of us, so idk why it's a point of huge interest. It's like the drinking age law. Once you turn 21 you stop caring about how bullshit it is.

Would rather debate about burgers/tacos
eh I know plenty of people who thought the same back when the drinking age was 18 (or buying tobacco was 18) until the drinking age changed and screwed them all over again (or people could finally buy cigarettes and then suddenly couldnt)
Are you like 50 years old, who are these people you're referring to? Or was it recently changed in some specific state?
Unless your parents are 30, you, too, know people who remember when the drinking age was 18. For your own sake I hope your reading comprehension isn't actually that poor.
Awk, I'm an orphan

User avatar
aur

New
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2016 11:20 am

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust) NOSCORE F, S, S, MONDAY??!!

Post by aur » Mon Jun 27, 2016 3:56 pm

pretzeltime wrote:
aur wrote:
pretzeltime wrote:
forum_user wrote:
pretzeltime wrote:Bleghhhhhhh the LSAT ain't gonna change in time for any (or most) of us, so idk why it's a point of huge interest. It's like the drinking age law. Once you turn 21 you stop caring about how bullshit it is.

Would rather debate about burgers/tacos
Wait--what about burgers/burritos
We can do that.

I'd pick burgers for sure, altho I do love a breakfast burrito.
A good breakfast burrito is one of my favorite things ever. There's a place by me that only does them on weekends which is disappointing because they're practically life-changing.
I also eat Whole Foods bean and cheese freezer burritos for breakfast all the time. With a lil' avocado. Tasty, delightful, sorta lowcal, nutritious
These ones have scrambled eggs, hash browns, cheese, and sausage, so I feel like I'm on the verge of a clogged artery after eating one but 10/10 definitely worth it.

User avatar
forum_user

Silver
Posts: 844
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2015 9:40 am

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust) NOSCORE FRIDAY

Post by forum_user » Mon Jun 27, 2016 3:56 pm

rska884 wrote:
forum_user wrote:
rska884 wrote:
forum_user wrote:
rska884 wrote: OK, so it's unofficial. What happens if they get it wrong? Do you get refunded?

How many people are they hiring to man those phones? Do they already have the staff to coordinate this, or are they going to be relying on enough people spending $100 for an extra few hour head start on nothing to fund part time salaries for a large number of people?

I'm with Bird, I don't get why there's any need to spend large amounts of money and potentially inconvenience people by reducing the number of test centers and/or increasing the cost of administration. Sure, there are very unique one-off situations, but making changes to accommodate those at the expense of everyone else seems like a bad idea to me.

As anxious as y'all are, you get absolutely no benefit from learning early. Use this extra time to go find some Xanax or something.
If it's just an automated system they would need very little manpower, like you just call the hotline, dial in your LSAC number, and they list off your score. Sure there's no material benefit, but clearly the emotional cost isn't nil--and we are customers, after all. Law schools are already accepting the GRE which drew the scorn of LSAC but the support of pretty much every other accredited law school. They're going to have to start acting like they exist in a competitive marketplace eventually.
...you're going to take the GRE instead because they didn't give you your score fast enough?
[+] Spoiler
hurr
I mean, it's not a strawman - it's literally your argument. You said they should provide scores early (for a fee) in order to keep people from going to their competitor.
Of which one step would be more convenient score reporting. Jeez recognize a shift

User avatar
pretzeltime

Gold
Posts: 1993
Joined: Sat May 07, 2016 6:57 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust) NOSCORE F, S, S, MONDAY??!!

Post by pretzeltime » Mon Jun 27, 2016 3:57 pm

forum_user wrote:
aur wrote:
pretzeltime wrote:
forum_user wrote:
pretzeltime wrote:Bleghhhhhhh the LSAT ain't gonna change in time for any (or most) of us, so idk why it's a point of huge interest. It's like the drinking age law. Once you turn 21 you stop caring about how bullshit it is.

Would rather debate about burgers/tacos
Wait--what about burgers/burritos
We can do that.

I'd pick burgers for sure, altho I do love a breakfast burrito.
A good breakfast burrito is one of my favorite things ever. There's a place by me that only does them on weekends which is disappointing because they're practically life-changing.
Actually not a huge fan of breakfast burritos but I think burritos might be my favorite food overall

But Pret don't breakfast burritos have... eggs?
The eggs in brekky burritos are very manageable for me because there is so much else going on in there and hot sauce and they're wrapped in a carb etc etc

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


Mikey

Platinum
Posts: 8046
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust) NOSCORE F, S, S, MONDAY??!!

Post by Mikey » Mon Jun 27, 2016 3:58 pm

Omg the amount of lurkers!!

User avatar
aur

New
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2016 11:20 am

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust) NOSCORE F, S, S, MONDAY??!!

Post by aur » Mon Jun 27, 2016 3:59 pm

forum_user wrote:Actually not a huge fan of breakfast burritos but I think burritos might be my favorite food overall
I wasn't a fan of breakfast in general before coming to college. I'm glad that I've been enlightened though.

User avatar
rska884

Silver
Posts: 618
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 11:01 am

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust) NOSCORE FRIDAY

Post by rska884 » Mon Jun 27, 2016 3:59 pm

forum_user wrote:
rska884 wrote:
forum_user wrote:
rska884 wrote:
forum_user wrote: If it's just an automated system they would need very little manpower, like you just call the hotline, dial in your LSAC number, and they list off your score. Sure there's no material benefit, but clearly the emotional cost isn't nil--and we are customers, after all. Law schools are already accepting the GRE which drew the scorn of LSAC but the support of pretty much every other accredited law school. They're going to have to start acting like they exist in a competitive marketplace eventually.
...you're going to take the GRE instead because they didn't give you your score fast enough?
[+] Spoiler
hurr
I mean, it's not a strawman - it's literally your argument. You said they should provide scores early (for a fee) in order to keep people from going to their competitor.
Of which one step would be more convenient score reporting. Jeez recognize a shift
lol

User avatar
forum_user

Silver
Posts: 844
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2015 9:40 am

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust) NOSCORE F, S, S, MONDAY??!!

Post by forum_user » Mon Jun 27, 2016 3:59 pm

pretzeltime wrote:
BirdLawExpert wrote:
pretzeltime wrote:
Smallville wrote:
pretzeltime wrote:Bleghhhhhhh the LSAT ain't gonna change in time for any (or most) of us, so idk why it's a point of huge interest. It's like the drinking age law. Once you turn 21 you stop caring about how bullshit it is.

Would rather debate about burgers/tacos
eh I know plenty of people who thought the same back when the drinking age was 18 (or buying tobacco was 18) until the drinking age changed and screwed them all over again (or people could finally buy cigarettes and then suddenly couldnt)
Are you like 50 years old, who are these people you're referring to? Or was it recently changed in some specific state?
Unless your parents are 30, you, too, know people who remember when the drinking age was 18. For your own sake I hope your reading comprehension isn't actually that poor.
Awk, I'm an orphan
Wouldn't exactly refer to my parents as "plenty of people" tho

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”