Page 1 of 1
Trying to get to -0 or -1 on LG. Try Velocity or stick with 7Sage?
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2016 4:34 pm
by LSATKiller24
I love what 7Sage does with pretty much everything, and they've done a hell of a job helping me score into the low/mid 160s. That being said, I still average around -6 per LG section, and I wanted to see if bolstering 7Sage with some Velocity LG approaches may be a good idea to bring up my score. Anyone take Velocity to know how it stacks up against 7Sage? Are they compatible? I've read pretty damn good things about velocity's LG approach but I don't want it to completely throw me off from 7 sage's method... Thoughts? Thanks in advance for your input
Re: Trying to get to -0 or -1 on LG. Try Velocity or stick with 7Sage?
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2016 5:16 pm
by tsujimoto74
Not either of those things, but I used the PowerScore books for LG and got -1 on that section of my LSAT. tbh, that -1 was only wrong because it was the last question and I needed about 15 more seconds than allotted. I had whittled my choices down to 2, but I ran out of time and just had to guess between them and guessed wrong.
I never tried Velocity or 7Sage, so I can't vouch for either, but I recommend the PowerScore books highly.
Re: Trying to get to -0 or -1 on LG. Try Velocity or stick with 7Sage?
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2016 3:40 pm
by AbbeyS
The Cambridge bundles were extremely helpful for me because they have full games from like 35 early tests. I combined that with the 7Sage app...just watched his explanation videos for the games. Drill it again and again if you don't get it. Revisit it later on...
I consistently went -0 or -1 on my PTs before February using Cambridge bundles & the 7Sage free app. Just drill drill drill. Focus on his methods if you're lost & try to emulate. You'll eventually notice patterns between the games so much that some will look like repeats.
To compare, I literally got 9 wrong on my June '15 test so it really helped me grasp LG.