Page 1 of 1
Mercy From LSAC?
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2016 11:30 am
by LitigatingLiar
What's this trend for the mid 60's PTs to give us all this room on LG? We barely had any room before and I remember one test where there was literally no room to diagram because it was like 8 or 9 questions?
Re: Mercy From LSAC?
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2016 11:42 am
by SamuelDanforth
I'm confused as to what your question is. Starting in the mid to late 60s they introduced a different layout so as to provide more work space. That's how it has been formatted on all subsequent tests. It's much better!
Re: Mercy From LSAC?
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2016 1:06 pm
by RZ5646
Personally, after practicing on old tests, I thought the extra space was distracting and a time waster, since you have to look back and forth a greater distance.
Re: Mercy From LSAC?
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2016 1:19 pm
by Clearly
RZ5646 wrote:Personally, after practicing on old tests, I thought the extra space was distracting and a time waster, since you have to look back and forth a greater distance.
Thats why you do your diagram on the right page, so that once you finish the acceptability question you don't have to look back.
Re: Mercy From LSAC?
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2016 3:30 pm
by LitigatingLiar
SamuelDanforth wrote:I'm confused as to what your question is. Starting in the mid to late 60s they introduced a different layout so as to provide more work space. That's how it has been formatted on all subsequent tests. It's much better!
Oh, I'm not complaining. I like the extra room. I'm just curious as to what prompted it. As I said above, there were some tests where there was no room. They usually find ways to make things harder on us, not easier.