Mercy From LSAC? Forum
-
- Posts: 172
- Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2015 4:25 pm
Mercy From LSAC?
What's this trend for the mid 60's PTs to give us all this room on LG? We barely had any room before and I remember one test where there was literally no room to diagram because it was like 8 or 9 questions?
-
- Posts: 183
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 5:05 pm
Re: Mercy From LSAC?
I'm confused as to what your question is. Starting in the mid to late 60s they introduced a different layout so as to provide more work space. That's how it has been formatted on all subsequent tests. It's much better!
- RZ5646
- Posts: 2391
- Joined: Fri May 30, 2014 1:31 pm
Re: Mercy From LSAC?
Personally, after practicing on old tests, I thought the extra space was distracting and a time waster, since you have to look back and forth a greater distance.
- Clearly
- Posts: 4189
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 4:09 pm
Re: Mercy From LSAC?
Thats why you do your diagram on the right page, so that once you finish the acceptability question you don't have to look back.RZ5646 wrote:Personally, after practicing on old tests, I thought the extra space was distracting and a time waster, since you have to look back and forth a greater distance.
-
- Posts: 172
- Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2015 4:25 pm
Re: Mercy From LSAC?
Oh, I'm not complaining. I like the extra room. I'm just curious as to what prompted it. As I said above, there were some tests where there was no room. They usually find ways to make things harder on us, not easier.SamuelDanforth wrote:I'm confused as to what your question is. Starting in the mid to late 60s they introduced a different layout so as to provide more work space. That's how it has been formatted on all subsequent tests. It's much better!
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login