Top Law Schools

(Banner courtesy of JackelJ) Happy waiting!

BEFORE PARTICIPATING ITT PLEASE READ TLS' POST ON RULES HERE.

A thread on when we can discuss the questions: HERE.

Confirmed sections:
LG - Salary, Trees being planted in lots, Magazine slots & features
RC - Glass, videos in ethnography, morals & Immanuel Kant, judge's bias/recusal
LR - both sections had 25 questions. Confirmed real LR questions from either section: babbling babies, planet orbits, life on the moon, prosecutor choosing to press charges, farming and phases of the moon, rockets with long/short nozzles, tea/coffee health study, mate (that drink from paraguay), artist whose work was derivative of his mentor, farming co-ops and supermarkets

Poll Results:

How was the test overall?

..

Any word on what the official sections were? Did everybody get the games section where the last game was magazine spreads?

..

Just got done. Thought the games weren't too bad. Had an LR experimental and I hope it was section 3. I feel better coming out of the test than I thought I would. That could mean 175 it could also mean 165 or anywhere in between or outside of that range.

I thought the first game was more surprising than the last one. Most the last games questions were based on that conditional rule with finance and whatever.

..

I had trouble with the last one because of timing. I thought the rules were confusing.

Btw, here are the real sections. Somebody who had a better memory of it can expand ...

Games: magazine spread
lr1: babies babbling is linguistic act
lr2: can't remember ...
Reading: glass, video in ethnography, morals

Ok that wasn't super helpful for lr. Sorry.

.

..

What were the first three game topics in real section?

Rule my bad

zacboro wrote:As far as I'm concerned which LR sections were real doesn't matter too much because I never know which section I saw an LR question in- 75 questions is way too much to retain and categorize. How do u know baby's babbling is real?

Well, I only had 2 lr sections, but if they mix experimental questions with real questions then I guess I don't know.

cbbinnyc wrote:

zacboro wrote:As far as I'm concerned which LR sections were real doesn't matter too much because I never know which section I saw an LR question in- 75 questions is way too much to retain and categorize. How do u know baby's babbling is real?

Well, I only had 2 lr sections, but if they mix experimental questions with real questions then I guess I don't know.

They don't do that remember any questions?

Post removed.

..

The last game was extremely easy IMO. I can't say anything else about it except that there were so few rules that the questions flowed. I would be happy to discuss it more when we aren't banned from discussing the questions.

I tanked on RC. Thankfully I finished but there were a few that I wasn't sure on.

Same with LR. Guessing the third section was experimental. Didn't have time to check ANY of my answers.

All in all, expecting a 176-177. Retake likely in the air but I am not going to cancel my score.

Since there were only 100 questions, the curve will probably be more vicious. 99-100 for a 180, and one point per question until the low 170s.

Post removed.

RC was my first section and I did so good but it ended up being my experimental... so pissed but I think I did decent on the real RC which is usually my worst section so I'll take it

The LG was extremely easy bar the last game but I think I just didn't have enough time to understand exactly what the rules were saying so that sucks

LR was average for me

Overall I might retake in October we'll see


Also to note.... 121 people registered to take it at the test center I was at and only 68 of us showed up haha

I'm doneeeeeeee

.

TheWalkingDebt wrote:Stipend game was game one where EDIT

Was this in the question or something you had to solve for somehow?

..

A. Nony Mouse wrote:

TheWalkingDebt wrote:Stipend game was...

Was this in the question or something you had to solve for somehow?

This states a rule, it should be edited out

Post removed.