Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=243243
Can you answer the question?hereisonehand wrote:is this experimental poetry?
I don't think anyone canltowns1 wrote:Can you answer the question?hereisonehand wrote:is this experimental poetry?
Then please just go away, no need to be a bully. I just want my question answered thanks. No more,no less.hereisonehand wrote:I don't think anyone canltowns1 wrote:Can you answer the question?hereisonehand wrote:is this experimental poetry?
good luck
ETA: follow your dreams
if that is not beauty I don't know what isA conditional conclusion by ltowns1
In an argument with conditional reasoning
going to look to do somehing
to the necessary condition.
Strengthen, assumption!
Flaw, weaken.
I don't understand the question. What do you mean "do something to"?ltowns1 wrote:In an argument with conditional reasoning are we always going to look to do somehing to the necessary condition? Or does this depend on the question type (strengthen, assumption, flaw,weaken..etc.)
I think he means "rub gently"kaiser wrote:I don't understand the question. What do you mean "do something to"?ltowns1 wrote:In an argument with conditional reasoning are we always going to look to do somehing to the necessary condition? Or does this depend on the question type (strengthen, assumption, flaw,weaken..etc.)
Conditional Reasoning in Sufficient Questions by ltowns1
looking for condtionality
in suff. questions
looking for the something
in the conclusion
trigger the premises
sufficient statement
Condtionality answer choice in a necessary assumption by ltowns1
Every once N a while
answer choices
give conditionality
in assumption questions.
Is there ever a time
you should take
more than 2 seconds?
Lol LSAT by ltowns1
I tell them
there are four wrong answers
and one right answer for sure
(I took the LSAT in the early 80's!!!!!!)
SERIOUSLY SHUT THE BLANK UP
lol.
not now!!!!!
I FEEL SOOO MUCH BETTER NOW LOL
Method of argument questions by ltowns1
Treat it like an inference question
Like any other assumption family question
Lol LSAT (part II) by ltowns1
Back to the topic at hand
not ignorant statements made by
a select few
What makes it real bad is that
even if they did
Take the test
they would probably find a way to say.... lollll
Writing like this
for a purpose
btw.
Preptest 26 sec-3 #21 by ltowns1
Finding he weakness n
this argument
Look for the necessary
premise in the argument
Just trying to
find
the weakness
kaiser wrote:I don't understand the question. What do you mean "do something to"?ltowns1 wrote:In an argument with conditional reasoning are we always going to look to do somehing to the necessary condition? Or does this depend on the question type (strengthen, assumption, flaw,weaken..etc.)
Dirigo wrote:No offense, but your question really doesn't make any sense, so I guess the answer would be a simple no.
Maybe edit a fourth time to clarify?
(no title)
When I say
"do something"
I mean:
attack
(corresponding to the question type)
The only way to attack a necessary condition is to make it no longer necessary. But I think you just answered your own question: you would only attack it in a weaken question. Even then, you want to "attack" the argument (the premise to conclusion relationship), not just one part of the argument. Normally with conditionality, the question is looking for either a SA or NA, so you will need to provide an assumption.ltowns1 wrote:When I say "do something" I mean attack the necessary condition in the way corresponding to the question typekaiser wrote:I don't understand the question. What do you mean "do something to"?ltowns1 wrote:In an argument with conditional reasoning are we always going to look to do somehing to the necessary condition? Or does this depend on the question type (strengthen, assumption, flaw,weaken..etc.)
Dude, stop doing this. If you want to exercise your creativity in this way head over to the lounge. If you don't want to answer someone's question just ignore the thread.hereisonehand wrote:(no title)
When I say
"do something"
I mean:
attack
(corresponding to the question type)
But there can be situations where you can have it in a strengthening question as well right...Dirigo wrote:The only way to attack a necessary condition is to make it no longer necessary. But I think you just answered your own question: you would only attack it in a weaken question. Even then, you want to "attack" the argument (the premise to conclusion relationship), not just one part of the argument. Normally with conditionality, the question is looking for either a SA or NA, so you will need to provide an assumption.ltowns1 wrote:When I say "do something" I mean attack the necessary condition in the way corresponding to the question typekaiser wrote:I don't understand the question. What do you mean "do something to"?ltowns1 wrote:In an argument with conditional reasoning are we always going to look to do somehing to the necessary condition? Or does this depend on the question type (strengthen, assumption, flaw,weaken..etc.)
Yeah I have, I just like to ask questions up here...books can't respond back if you have a question, and im not taking a prep course.msp8 wrote:ltowns1, have you read any books on LR? You've posted a lot of questions on LR. It may be useful to pick up a book to get a firmer grasp of the fundamentals.
Can you provide me with an actual LSAT question that showcases what you are asking?ltowns1 wrote: But there can be situations where you can have it in a strengthening question as well right...
So for example, John plays basketball. Therfore, if he plays basketball he is smart?
Which answer strengthens this argument? I should be looking for something that supports the necessary condition right???
You should check out the Manhattan forums. They're pretty good for explanations.ltowns1 wrote:Yeah I have, I just like to ask questions up here...books can't respond back if you have a question, and im not taking a prep course.msp8 wrote:ltowns1, have you read any books on LR? You've posted a lot of questions on LR. It may be useful to pick up a book to get a firmer grasp of the fundamentals.