Page 1 of 1
Are tests 19-28 useful to study or too outdated?
Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 3:12 pm
by Rstein888
Some of the questions kind of have a different feel to them.
Re: Are tests 19-28 useful to study or too outdated?
Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 9:28 pm
by stray
Yea, they are useful. Sure, they are somewhat different in small ways (some of the games are pretty weird, and there are minor differences in the style of LR), but much of it is the same. If you have time, def use all of them (including 1-18).
Re: Are tests 19-28 useful to study or too outdated?
Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 9:30 pm
by ilikebaseball
The LR and RC is useful. The only change in the LR is that now there aren't "double" stimulus' (stimulus that account for 2 questions in a row).
LG seems much different and easier. But, IMHO, all of it is useful. Create good habits, and drill questions you've never seen before. Its better to do that than drill 50's PTs that you've already seen
Re: Are tests 19-28 useful to study or too outdated?
Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 9:40 pm
by DrSpaceman
Definitely still valuable. Anything that stretches your logic engine is good practice. Besides, some of the recent LG sections have thrown old-school curveballs anyway.
Re: Are tests 19-28 useful to study or too outdated?
Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 11:20 pm
by Clyde Frog
Everything is useful. Don't neglect the old LG games! Outdated games are appearing more and more in recent tests.
Re: Are tests 19-28 useful to study or too outdated?
Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2015 10:45 am
by ChemEng1642
Useful for drilling