xx
Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2014 1:10 pm
xx
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=238689
I have the BP LG book and it is significantly shorter than the PS Bible...hopeboaltberkeley wrote:So both the Manhattan and Blueprint guides are a lot less dry than PowerScore. In my opinion, Blueprint over does it and tries a bit too hard to be funny and attuned to pop-culture, whereas Manhattan is more easygoing about its sarcasm/humor.
However, the issue with with Manhattan is that a couple of its methods for grouping games are markedly different from both PowerScore's and Blueprint's. In my opinion, those methods are less intuitive than the approaches offered by the other two companies. (PowerScore has its downsides too with relative ordering games. I thought BluePrint effectively synthesized the best of PowerScore and Manhattan with regards to diagramming methods). That being said, Manhattan does have useful discussions on "front end" vs "back end" games.
A potential issue with BP and Manhattan is that they are about 150 pages longer than PowerScore. You realize reading them that some of the dryness of PowerScore was the company's attempt at being concise. But yeah, if you're looking for something less dry then the other books certainly are less dry.
Do you recommend it? Have you tried Manhattan?nlee10 wrote:I have the BP LG book and it is significantly shorter than the PS Bible...hopeboaltberkeley wrote:So both the Manhattan and Blueprint guides are a lot less dry than PowerScore. In my opinion, Blueprint over does it and tries a bit too hard to be funny and attuned to pop-culture, whereas Manhattan is more easygoing about its sarcasm/humor.
However, the issue with with Manhattan is that a couple of its methods for grouping games are markedly different from both PowerScore's and Blueprint's. In my opinion, those methods are less intuitive than the approaches offered by the other two companies. (PowerScore has its downsides too with relative ordering games. I thought BluePrint effectively synthesized the best of PowerScore and Manhattan with regards to diagramming methods). That being said, Manhattan does have useful discussions on "front end" vs "back end" games.
A potential issue with BP and Manhattan is that they are about 150 pages longer than PowerScore. You realize reading them that some of the dryness of PowerScore was the company's attempt at being concise. But yeah, if you're looking for something less dry then the other books certainly are less dry.
I have not tried LG from Manhattan but I presume they are good. I used Manhattan LR and found it much better than the PS LR Bible.dmarieb wrote: Do you recommend it? Have you tried Manhattan?
I am having a lot of trouble with the LG Powerscore Bible...
What edition do you have? My "The Blueprint for Logic Games" is from 2013 -- which I think is their latest -- and it is 553 pages long (not including the appendix). It could be that you have a different edition, or that they supply different material for people taking the class?nlee10 wrote: I have the BP LG book and it is significantly shorter than the PS Bible...
If you had to pick one, I'd say Blueprint. I prefer many aspects of Manhattan's book, but for me, some of their grouping games methods are the deal-breaker.dmarieb wrote:I have tried everywhere. It's like Blueprint buys every used copy they see so that you have to buy a new $50.00 copy!hopeboaltberkeley wrote:Have you tried craigslist?
So would you recommend Manhattan or Blueprint? I'm just going to buy one. Whatever.