Top Law Schools

Hi there,

I have already spent plenty of $$$ on LSAT prep (Blueprint course which unfortunately did pretty much nothing for me), LG Bible and Cambridge LG packets, so I am a wary of spending anything more. I'm planning to take the December 2014 LSAT. Last PT I did was Dec 2002, scored 167 (-10 LR, -2 LG, -5 RC). I think I have my approach down for LG and will just continue to drill, but I'd like to focus in on LR.

So, the question is, which is the better use of my remaining time and money, for LR specifically: the LSAT trainer or Manhattan LR? Any advice is appreciated!

Thanks!

PS I work full time so don't think I have time to do both! I would do both if I had the time. Thanks! Hoping to score 168+ in December.

They're both excellent and complement each other very well.

Dirigo wrote:They're both excellent and complement each other very well.

Second. Mike (author of the Trainer) helped create the Manhattan series so the teaching styles are very similar. Since you are fairly familiar with the LSAT and LR, the Trainer might suffice, but I thought that I improved more using Manhattan LR.