Page 1 of 1
Feb 99 Hardest LSAT
Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2014 8:49 pm
by BillsFan9907
Just took the February 1999 test, otherwise known as preptest B or 20.5. It had a -4 curve for getting a 180!!! Has there ever been a harder or equally hard test?
Re: Feb 99 Hardest LSAT
Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2014 9:09 pm
by Colonel_funkadunk
Seoulless wrote:Just took the February 1999 test, otherwise known as preptest B or 20.5. It had a -4 curve for getting a 180!!! Has there ever been a harder or equally hard test?
I mean I think some of the tests w the -8 or -9 curve to get a 170 are just as hard to get a similar score to PT B which has a -15 curve. It's all relative
.
Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2014 9:18 pm
by Gray
.
Re: Feb 99 Hardest LSAT
Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2014 9:31 pm
by Colonel_funkadunk
Holy grey is an LSAT prodigy.
Yea but B is nbd
.
Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2014 9:33 pm
by Gray
.
Re: Feb 99 Hardest LSAT
Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2014 9:38 pm
by Colonel_funkadunk
Sup grey looks like we found another thread to chatter in
Re: Feb 99 Hardest LSAT
Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2014 9:50 pm
by BillPackets
Sup bill is in the party too
Re: Feb 99 Hardest LSAT
Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2014 9:54 pm
by BillPackets
IMHO this test was pretty hard idc what colonel says oh it's all relative yeah sure but that necessary assumption q bout tillage was basically a riddle
Re: Feb 99 Hardest LSAT
Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2014 10:06 pm
by Colonel_funkadunk
If I hear u say riddle one more time
Re: Feb 99 Hardest LSAT
Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2014 10:14 pm
by BillPackets
Colonel_funkadunk wrote: riddle
.
Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2014 10:18 pm
by Gray
.
Re: Feb 99 Hardest LSAT
Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2014 10:32 pm
by 03152016
the games are pretty tough
but not unreasonably so
the table game tends to throw people off
they usually set it up like a table
but it's better as a number line
Re: Feb 99 Hardest LSAT
Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2014 10:41 pm
by BillsFan9907
smccgrey wrote:Personally I found it super easy... I'm sure the curve had something to do with it. I have extolled the virtues of Superprep B in the September thread.
Really? What have u said?
Re: Feb 99 Hardest LSAT
Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2014 10:44 pm
by BillPackets
Seoulless wrote:smccgrey wrote:Personally I found it super easy... I'm sure the curve had something to do with it. I have extolled the virtues of Superprep B in the September thread.
Really? What have u said?
It was her second PT n she 178ed it like it's nbd
Re: Feb 99 Hardest LSAT
Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2014 10:50 pm
by BillsFan9907
Brut wrote:the games are pretty tough
but not unreasonably so
the table game tends to throw people off
they usually set it up like a table
but it's better as a number line
Yes absolutely. No reason not to treat it like a linear game... Just remember that 1 and 8 are next to each other.
Re: Feb 99 Hardest LSAT
Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2014 10:56 pm
by w0w
smccgrey wrote:BillPackets wrote:Colonel_funkadunk wrote: riddle
Sorry Seoulless... I hope we answered your question adequately before derailing this thread.
I think Superprep B has a -15 170, and I've seen a couple with -14 170. Don't think that makes it harder though.
I think last oct or dec was a -14.
Re: Feb 99 Hardest LSAT
Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2014 11:14 pm
by BillPackets
Seoulless wrote:Brut wrote:the games are pretty tough
but not unreasonably so
the table game tends to throw people off
they usually set it up like a table
but it's better as a number line
Yes absolutely. No reason not to treat it like a linear game... Just remember that 1 and 8 are next to each other.
Idk I set it up as an octagon. Setting up circular games linearly throws me off. I thought the contrapositives of the second game with biconditionals in the necessary was weird. Threw me off
Re: Feb 99 Hardest LSAT
Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2014 11:20 pm
by 03152016
BillPackets wrote:Seoulless wrote:Brut wrote:the games are pretty tough
but not unreasonably so
the table game tends to throw people off
they usually set it up like a table
but it's better as a number line
Yes absolutely. No reason not to treat it like a linear game... Just remember that 1 and 8 are next to each other.
Idk I set it up as an octagon. Setting up circular games linearly throws me off. I thought the contrapositives of the second game with biconditionals in the necessary was weird. Threw me off
the game places elements in a linear way (using numbers)
if all the rules were relative a table setup would work better
that's a good rule of thumb, not that you'll likely see a table game ever again or anything
Re: Feb 99 Hardest LSAT
Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 12:26 am
by Rigo
Brut wrote:BillPackets wrote:Seoulless wrote:Brut wrote:the games are pretty tough
but not unreasonably so
the table game tends to throw people off
they usually set it up like a table
but it's better as a number line
Yes absolutely. No reason not to treat it like a linear game... Just remember that 1 and 8 are next to each other.
Idk I set it up as an octagon. Setting up circular games linearly throws me off. I thought the contrapositives of the second game with biconditionals in the necessary was weird. Threw me off
the game places elements in a linear way (using numbers)
if all the rules were relative a table setup would work better
that's a good rule of thumb, not that you'll likely see a table game ever again or anything
Hope not. I'm a weirdo who finds circle games so fun for some odd reason. Much prefer them to pattern games of the other miscellaneous ones.