Top Law Schools

.

papajohns wrote:I am thinking about suing this prep company because I think one of their artificial problems is wrong.

Problem
http://postimg.org/image/n2aigx1w1/]

Possible set up
http://postimg.org/image/5nlouwfdd/


For question 8, A is the correct answer. But if you look at my setup, both Ps can be on coin 1, an M on 2 and 4, along with a J each, and two Ts on 3. So there is no need for an M to be on coin 3.

Am I wrong?

As far as I can tell your set up doesn't violate any of the rules, and so yeah looks as if you are right.

But why would you sue them? Even LSAC has got questions wrong before - just let them know so they can change it in the next edition.

.

It's poorly worded, but I think they meant that T can't be on the same coin twice. Tough to tell without doing all the problems but maybe.

Actually looking this over, yeah this question is flawed. Guess that's why LSAC tests their questions before using them.

Better question:

Given that there are currently 76 (soon to be 77) official LSAT PTs available for prep, why are you using a book that contains fake LSAT games for prepping? LSAT prep books that contain fake LSAT materials as part of the curriculum instead of using real LSAT Qs and paying LSAC the licensing fees are all crappy.

Which 'off the shelf' book is that from? Barrons, Nova, Arco, LSAT for Dummies or one of the other cheap crappy ones (there's a new one on Amazon with a picture of a bottle of pepto bismal on the cover that looks pretty cheesy)? None of the quality prep companies use fake games as part of the curriculum in their self study prep books, although one company does publish some fake games for free on their website as extra practice for students that want more practice beyond the 300+ available real LSAT LGs along with the disclaimer that it's best to practice with real games and the fake ones are just for extra practice if you exhaust all the real stuff.

Whatever book it is, stop using it and getter better prep resources.

Clyde Frog wrote:Actually looking this over, yeah this question is flawed. Guess that's why LSAC tests their questions before using them.

Yea that was my first though after I looked at the question. The rule for "T" is what did it I think.

Hopefully you were just bored at Barnes and Noble one day while your boyfriend/girlfriend was looking for some book for thirty minutes, so you decided to pick up an LSAT strategy book that you knew that was crappy just to get a good laugh and you happened to get a good laugh indeed when you noticed that there was a legitimate glaring mistake in one of their shitty fake pointless logic games.