How to stop falling for the equivocation flaw in RC?
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 8:35 am
I have noticed that while taking PTs, in the rush of time, I end up committing the equivocation flaw on answer choices ALOT.
Do you all have any tips on avoiding this? Upon slow, untimed review, my mistakes stick out like a sore thumb and I feel stupid. But in the rush of time, these falsely equivocated answers just seem so attractive.
Here is an example by what I mean. I committed the following mistake:
The answer choice said “To offer evidence that the behavior of tadpoles is unexplainable” and I equivocated that with “To offer support that the inclusive kin theory cannot explain certain behaviors of tadpoles”.
These two ideas are very different, but in the rush of time, I falsely equivocated them. As stated before, I do this alot on RC.
Any help is much appreciated!
Do you all have any tips on avoiding this? Upon slow, untimed review, my mistakes stick out like a sore thumb and I feel stupid. But in the rush of time, these falsely equivocated answers just seem so attractive.
Here is an example by what I mean. I committed the following mistake:
The answer choice said “To offer evidence that the behavior of tadpoles is unexplainable” and I equivocated that with “To offer support that the inclusive kin theory cannot explain certain behaviors of tadpoles”.
These two ideas are very different, but in the rush of time, I falsely equivocated them. As stated before, I do this alot on RC.
Any help is much appreciated!