Old vs New LR questions Forum

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
Post Reply
User avatar
gnomgnomuch

Silver
Posts: 540
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 11:34 pm

Old vs New LR questions

Post by gnomgnomuch » Thu Feb 27, 2014 9:42 pm

I've been drilling the LR Cambridge packets currently, doing the questions from prep tests 1-39, and saving 40 and upwards for full length tests and whatnot, is this fine, because I've heard that the older tests LR are rather different than the newer tests LR sections.

User avatar
Jeffort

Gold
Posts: 1888
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 4:43 pm

Re: Old vs New LR questions

Post by Jeffort » Thu Feb 27, 2014 9:50 pm

The overall question type distributions per section and other stylistic stuff is different in older tests vs newer tests but the structure and logic of each of the question types/individual questions isn't much different except for some occasional odd/weird questions on many of the really old tests from the 1990s.

For drilling purposes, old LR is perfectly fine but for section/full test practice, older sections are not representative of current full sections. There are some stylistic differences with older vs newer questions, but that is true if you compare any LR sections that are 5 or more years different in age since the subtle styles are always slowly evolving/changing slightly over time.

There are several more significant differences in the layout of very recent modern LR sections compared to much older ones that are important to become aware of leading up to test day when in full timed PT mode for phase 3 but nothing that matters for drilling and learning the basics during phase 1 and 2 of prep.

Post Reply

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”