Top Law Schools

I feel like this question is poorly designed.

Out of all the evaluate questions from the Cambridge packet this one is giving me the most trouble... and it's a level 1

I don't see how (D) is the best answer.

The conclusion is - so you know, if you a buy a Bolter's you are buying a power hedge trimmer whose safety is assured. or wait? is this a sub con? Is the first sentence the conclusion?

What does (D) have to do with the safety being assured assuming the conclusion I designated is correct.

If the answer to (D) is "yes" there are safer ways to trim a hedge- what does that have to do with safety being assured with a Bolter's power hedge trimmer.

I didn't even pick answer choice (C) but now that I'm thinking about it- it seems most logical.

If the results as in answer choice (C) are awful than that destroys the argument. If the results are great then the conclusion is valid.

I originally picked answer choice E. After marking it wrong and reevaluating I picked answer choice (B).

Now I think it's (C)

But it's really (D)

screw this question- help :/

the answer *is* C

In my copy of PT10-S1-Q6, the answer is C. Double check your answer key?

I wouldn't worry too much about an evaluate question from an early PT.