Page 1 of 1
LR-LG-LR(exp)-LR-RC OR LR(exp)-LG-LR-LR-RC? forDec 2013 LSAT
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 6:35 pm
by dreamofNYC
Anyone?
I am hoping LR-LG-LR(exp)-LR-RC
Re: LR-LG-LR(exp)-LR-RC OR LR(exp)-LG-LR-LR-RC? forDec 2013 LSAT
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 6:36 pm
by jcccc
People are saying the 2nd one.
I hope so
Re: LR-LG-LR(exp)-LR-RC OR LR(exp)-LG-LR-LR-RC? forDec 2013 LSAT
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 6:40 pm
by Hoping4Happiness
well if its of any importance i know the first LR was 25, and the next two were 26.... so I'm guessing the experimental one was the one that had the 2 instances where there were 1 stimulus for 2 questions.... once i noticed that i assumed it was the experimental and i know this is frowned upon but I just went through it at a relaxed speed... and was out of time by question 20 so ya if it turns out thats NOT the experimental l need to cancel.... lol
Re: LR-LG-LR(exp)-LR-RC OR LR(exp)-LG-LR-LR-RC? forDec 2013 LSAT
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 6:46 pm
by dreamofNYC
Hoping4Happiness wrote:well if its of any importance i know the first LR was 25, and the next two were 26.... so I'm guessing the experimental one was the one that had the 2 instances where there were 1 stimulus for 2 questions.... once i noticed that i assumed it was the experimental and i know this is frowned upon but I just went through it at a relaxed speed... and was out of time by question 20 so ya if it turns out thats NOT the experimental l need to cancel.... lol
Interesting, I didn't even think of that. Indeed, the first LR had 25 Q whereas LR2 the presumably experimental one had 26. I would expect one section of 25Q and the other of 26Q vs. both 26Q.

Fingers crossed!
Re: LR-LG-LR(exp)-LR-RC OR LR(exp)-LG-LR-LR-RC? forDec 2013 LSAT
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 6:56 pm
by AJB
I thought it was 25-25-26? Not 25-26-26
Re: LR-LG-LR(exp)-LR-RC OR LR(exp)-LG-LR-LR-RC? forDec 2013 LSAT
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 6:58 pm
by dreamofNYC
AJB wrote:I thought it was 25-25-26? Not 25-26-26
Hmm you may be right.
LR-LG-LR(exp)-LR-RC!! has been confirmed for Dec 2013!!
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 7:24 pm
by dreamofNYC
LR-LG-LR(exp)-LR-RC!! has been confirmed for Dec 2013!!
Re: LR-LG-LR(exp)-LR-RC OR LR(exp)-LG-LR-LR-RC? forDec 2013 LSAT
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 7:33 pm
by A. Nony Mouse
People, there is extensive discussion of this in the waiters' thread, we don't need a bunch of individual posts rehashing it.
http://top-law-schools.com/forums/viewt ... 6&t=220914