Page 1 of 1

.

Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2013 5:38 pm
by 10052014
.

.

Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2013 11:38 pm
by 10052014
.

Re: Anyone try drilling with BP LG?

Posted: Sat Sep 14, 2013 12:04 am
by Dr.Zer0
I've read both books, and tbh I would recommend just sticking with BP LG. Their diagram methods are more intuitive than PS LG. But if you are adamant about doing both, I would do BP LG first and drill after every chapter using the Cambridge packets. Then I would skim over PS LG. The only thing the PS LG has over the BP book is that PS has a chapter dedicated to Misc./Neither games.

.

Posted: Sat Sep 14, 2013 12:24 am
by 10052014
.

Re: Anyone try drilling with BP LG?

Posted: Sat Sep 14, 2013 2:34 am
by haus
I sampled both books, and opted to read BP for LG. In the samples I looked at, I seemed to grasp the material more readily from the BP book.

.

Posted: Sat Sep 14, 2013 11:16 am
by 10052014
.

Re: Anyone try drilling with BP LG?

Posted: Sat Sep 14, 2013 6:05 pm
by Cambridge LSAT
This chart will give you a good starting point. The classifications don't always line up neatly (especially for Assignment games), but it should help for drilling.

.

Posted: Sat Sep 14, 2013 7:48 pm
by 10052014
.

Re: Anyone try drilling with BP LG?

Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 2:05 pm
by Erickt26
jaylawyer09 wrote:
Cambridge LSAT wrote:This chart will give you a good starting point. The classifications don't always line up neatly (especially for Assignment games), but it should help for drilling.
Wow!
thanks

I will begin the drilling with the BP book tmrw
I think 7sages method to approaching games is more time efficient. I took blueprint and they have a great method for balanced unbalanced games.