Top Law Schools

...

Yeah, I think that you have the right idea. Essentially, for the questions that you struggled with or got incorrect, you just deconstruct the question and make sure that you understand why the correct answer was correct, and why the other answer choices didn't 'fit' as well.

gottago wrote:what does reviewing a PT mean? what I do is look at questions I marked w/ ? or X and see what answer I picked, why I picked it, why wrong or right. Also look at right answer and

for LG, just redo the game
RC: find line reference
LR: how do you divine why a choice is right?

For Logical Reasoning, I've had some success reviewing with 7Sages "Blind Review" Method.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PPhj7pUi ... e=youtu.be (7Sage Blind Review Intro). He has like a 5-Video series of how to do it and taking it with a grain of salt and putting in some of your own twists it really helps in the LR Section.

For LG - I prefer Pithypike's Review Method...review what you do wrong immediately, waiting a day or two in between redoing the game. This really helped my ability in inference-making for solving games.

spam artist

next time do us a favor and don't quote it - only makes more work for us

...

gottago wrote:ok so you know why an answer is right or wrong.

what do you do with that knowledge?

apply it to your brain

Manhattan has an LR forum that has helpful explanations to LR questions here: http://www.manhattanlsat.com/blog/index ... planations

Also you can youtube LG video explanations, sometimes it's helpful to see how other people do them. 7sage and Velocity both have LG videos.

gottago wrote:ok so you know why an answer is right or wrong.

what do you do with that knowledge?

Put in perspective to other incorrect answers, perhaps? Or try and use it to notice patterns in the LR themselves.

.

gottago wrote:ok so you know why an answer is right or wrong.

what do you do with that knowledge?

First, noticing these things should help you develop a sense of the test. However, you're missing two huge questions you need to ask yourself during review:

1) What about the wrong answer made me think it was right?

This will let you know how the LSAT tricked you. There was something enticing about that answer choice; otherwise, you wouldn't have picked it. Figure out what enticed you. Then, don't fall for that same trick again.

2) What about the right answer made me think it was wrong?

This will let you know how the LSAT hid the right answer from you. You dismissed that answer for a reason; that reason wasn't a good reason to dismiss the AC. Figure out why you did it, and then don't do it again.