Top Law Schools

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wx9GxXY ... 1360952499

Pretty self-explanatory. I am not asserting that that the shooting did or that the shooting did not occur. Though I guess if one is not acknowledging that the shooting did occur, they're acknowledging that it didn't, kind of. But yeah, that's neither here nor there, I am asking the bright minds of TLS what you think.

If you haven't even watched the entire video, please don't post.

I am SO glad that you have joined this community of internet heralds.

I haven't watched any of the video but I'm gonna post anyway. You're an idiot

PromisedLand wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wx9GxXY ... 1360952499

Pretty self-explanatory. I am not asserting that that the shooting did or that the shooting did not occur. Though I guess if one is not acknowledging that the shooting did occur, they're acknowledging that it didn't, kind of. But yeah, that's neither here nor there, I am asking the bright minds of TLS what you think.

If you haven't even watched the entire video, please don't post.

Is this a subtly veiled 'flaw in the reasoning' question? That's the only explanation I can think for this post since this is the LSAT forum.

Post your conspiracies here: --LinkRemoved-- You are guaranteed to find rich, scholarly discussion about your topic.

What's wrong with you?

ah, hour-long youtube videos, the favorite peer-reviewed journal of conspiracy theorists

fatduck wrote:ah, hour-long youtube videos, the favorite peer-reviewed journal of conspiracy theorists

This is true on so many different levels

dingbat wrote:What's wrong with you?

The investigative journalist makes solid points. And I'm not sure I understand your question.

Ludovico Technique wrote:I haven't watched any of the video but I'm gonna post anyway. You're an idiot

TITCR

I hope a mod doesn't ban us for being off-topic...

This should be moved to the Lounge so it doesnt pop up on the main thread.

PromisedLand wrote:

dingbat wrote:What's wrong with you?

The investigative journalist makes solid points. And I'm not sure I understand your question.

Do you think this has anything to go with LSAT prep?

AssumptionRequired wrote:This should be moved to the Lounge so it doesnt pop up on the main thread.

dingbat wrote:

PromisedLand wrote:

dingbat wrote:What's wrong with you?

The investigative journalist makes solid points. And I'm not sure I understand your question.

Do you think this has anything to go with LSAT prep?

But what if the next LSAT has a passage about it?!

In what way did OP think it was all appropriate to place this in the LSAT prep forum?

Also:

Ludovico Technique wrote:I haven't watched any of the video but I'm gonna post anyway. You're an idiot

No. I think it has something to do with 'discussion'. Though the forum isn't entitled 'LSAT Prep and LSAT Discussion,' I guess I should have implied that the discussion was limited to matters concerning the LSAT.

I would move it if I could.

Unfortunately, this isn't the first time I've heard someone ask or even assert this pile of horse shit.

PromisedLand wrote:No. I think it has something to do with 'discussion'. Though the forum isn't entitled 'LSAT Prep and LSAT Discussion,' I guess I should have implied that the discussion was limited to matters concerning the LSAT.

I would move it if I could.

you're gonna do great on LR

fatduck wrote:

PromisedLand wrote:No. I think it has something to do with 'discussion'. Though the forum isn't entitled 'LSAT Prep and LSAT Discussion,' I guess I should have implied that the discussion was limited to matters concerning the LSAT.

I would move it if I could.

you're gonna do great on LR

Hopefully so.

i'll make a deal with you, obvious troll OP. i can't watch your youtube video because i'm deaf. if you write out a complete transcript of the video, i'll refute all the arguments.

PromisedLand wrote:No. I think it has something to do with 'discussion'. Though the forum isn't entitled 'LSAT Prep and LSAT Discussion,' I guess I should have implied that the discussion was limited to matters concerning the LSAT.

I would move it if I could.

Wait, wait. You thought the title of this forum meant that it was for LSAT Prep and also general discussion about whatever you wanted to talk about?

PromisedLand wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wx9GxXY ... 1360952499

Pretty self-explanatory. I am not asserting that that the shooting did or that the shooting did not occur. Though I guess if one is not acknowledging that the shooting did occur, they're acknowledging that it didn't, kind of. But yeah, that's neither here nor there, I am asking the bright minds of TLS what you think.

If you haven't even watched the entire video, please don't post.

Fuck you. That video is offensive beyond belief. "Grieving families or Oscar winners?"

GET.THE.FUCK.OUT.

fatduck wrote:i'll make a deal with you, obvious troll OP. i can't watch your youtube video because i'm deaf. if you write out a complete transcript of the video, i'll refute all the arguments.

I'm not that concerned with your refutations, so I'm gonna pass on the transcript. I'm runnin' a 5k for deaf people near Gallaudet in March though, maybe you'll benefit from that.

JamesDean1955 wrote:

PromisedLand wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wx9GxXY ... 1360952499

Pretty self-explanatory. I am not asserting that that the shooting did or that the shooting did not occur. Though I guess if one is not acknowledging that the shooting did occur, they're acknowledging that it didn't, kind of. But yeah, that's neither here nor there, I am asking the bright minds of TLS what you think.

If you haven't even watched the entire video, please don't post.

Fuck you. That video is offensive beyond belief. "Grieving families or Oscar winners?"

GET.THE.FUCK.OUT.

lol.

edit: Her father laughed and then poorly got into character. I think the question is valid.

PromisedLand wrote:No. I think it has something to do with 'discussion'. Though the forum isn't entitled 'LSAT Prep and LSAT Discussion,' I guess I should have implied that the discussion was limited to matters concerning the LSAT.

This is one of the dumbest things I have read on TLS. It is awesomely ignorant. It's almost beautiful in its stupefying dimness.

PromisedLand wrote:

fatduck wrote:i'll make a deal with you, obvious troll OP. i can't watch your youtube video because i'm deaf. if you write out a complete transcript of the video, i'll refute all the arguments.

I'm not that concerned with your refutations, so I'm gonna pass on the transcript. I'm runnin' a 5k for deaf people near Gallaudet in March though, maybe you'll benefit from that.

The government was involved in the shooting to take away our guns and eventually lead a military-style take over on its citizens where they can't defend themselves and become slaves to the state? Damn.