Top Law Schools

i know hard work can get you far, but how far really? If someone is dumb, then they're dumb, why tell them that a 170+ is possible for everyone and their grandma?

Just my 2 cents
This is the REAL world, not legally blonde

As for me, I'm getting a 175+

It's not possible for everyone to get over a 170. But if it's not possible for someone to break 170, they shouldn't go to law school.

itachiuchiha wrote:As for me, I'm getting a 175+

Are you trolling yourself?

TripTrip wrote:It's not possible for everyone to get over a 170. But if it's not possible for someone to break 170, they shouldn't go to law school.

That is like saying that if someone can't break 1300 on the SAT, they should not go to college. Here I am with a near 4.0. The LSAT is NOT a good indicator of how a person will do in school. Neither was the SAT or any standardized test.

itachiuchiha wrote:

TripTrip wrote:It's not possible for everyone to get over a 170. But if it's not possible for someone to break 170, they shouldn't go to law school.

That is like saying that if someone can't break 1300 on the SAT, they should not go to college. Here I am with a near 4.0. The LSAT is NOT a good indicator of how a person will do in school. Neither was the SAT or any standardized test.

terrible analogy. it has more to do with the type of school you'll get into than how you'll fare

TripTrip wrote:But if it's not possible for someone to break 170, they shouldn't go to law school.

loooool. Cute. Enjoy law school.

itachiuchiha wrote:

TripTrip wrote:It's not possible for everyone to get over a 170. But if it's not possible for someone to break 170, they shouldn't go to law school.

Here I am with a near 4.0.

lol what are you doing?

JamMasterJ wrote:

itachiuchiha wrote:

TripTrip wrote:It's not possible for everyone to get over a 170. But if it's not possible for someone to break 170, they shouldn't go to law school.

That is like saying that if someone can't break 1300 on the SAT, they should not go to college. Here I am with a near 4.0. The LSAT is NOT a good indicator of how a person will do in school. Neither was the SAT or any standardized test.

terrible analogy. it has more to do with the type of school you'll get into than how you'll fare

The dude just said that " if it's not possible for someone to break 170, they shouldn't go to law school."

DAMN, my highest was a 169, I guess Cooley is out of the question

itachiuchiha wrote:

JamMasterJ wrote:

itachiuchiha wrote:

TripTrip wrote:It's not possible for everyone to get over a 170. But if it's not possible for someone to break 170, they shouldn't go to law school.

That is like saying that if someone can't break 1300 on the SAT, they should not go to college. Here I am with a near 4.0. The LSAT is NOT a good indicator of how a person will do in school. Neither was the SAT or any standardized test.

terrible analogy. it has more to do with the type of school you'll get into than how you'll fare

The dude just said that " if it's not possible for someone to break 170, they shouldn't go to law school."

DAMN, my highest was a 169, I guess Cooley is out of the question

it is a general rule that a sub 170 won't likely net great options. Bils is obviously one exception

A → B ⊨ ¬B → ¬A wrote:

itachiuchiha wrote:

TripTrip wrote:It's not possible for everyone to get over a 170. But if it's not possible for someone to break 170, they shouldn't go to law school.

Here I am with a near 4.0.

lol what are you doing?

dual major in legal studies and poli sci

itachiuchiha wrote:

JamMasterJ wrote:

itachiuchiha wrote:

TripTrip wrote:It's not possible for everyone to get over a 170. But if it's not possible for someone to break 170, they shouldn't go to law school.

That is like saying that if someone can't break 1300 on the SAT, they should not go to college. Here I am with a near 4.0. The LSAT is NOT a good indicator of how a person will do in school. Neither was the SAT or any standardized test.

terrible analogy. it has more to do with the type of school you'll get into than how you'll fare

The dude just said that " if it's not possible for someone to break 170, they shouldn't go to law school."

DAMN, my highest was a 169, I guess Cooley is out of the question

Yield Protect

My lowest score is a 176. If you can't get a 180 then you are DUMB.