Why do people on here just assume that anyone can get 170+ Forum
-
- Posts: 908
- Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2012 9:59 pm
Why do people on here just assume that anyone can get 170+
i know hard work can get you far, but how far really? If someone is dumb, then they're dumb, why tell them that a 170+ is possible for everyone and their grandma?
Just my 2 cents
This is the REAL world, not legally blonde
As for me, I'm getting a 175+
Just my 2 cents
This is the REAL world, not legally blonde
As for me, I'm getting a 175+
- TripTrip
- Posts: 2767
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:52 am
Re: Why do people on here just assume that anyone can get 170+
It's not possible for everyone to get over a 170. But if it's not possible for someone to break 170, they shouldn't go to law school.
-
- Posts: 592
- Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 5:32 pm
Re: Why do people on here just assume that anyone can get 170+
Are you trolling yourself?itachiuchiha wrote:As for me, I'm getting a 175+
-
- Posts: 908
- Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2012 9:59 pm
Re: Why do people on here just assume that anyone can get 170+
That is like saying that if someone can't break 1300 on the SAT, they should not go to college. Here I am with a near 4.0. The LSAT is NOT a good indicator of how a person will do in school. Neither was the SAT or any standardized test.TripTrip wrote:It's not possible for everyone to get over a 170. But if it's not possible for someone to break 170, they shouldn't go to law school.
- JamMasterJ
- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: Why do people on here just assume that anyone can get 170+
terrible analogy. it has more to do with the type of school you'll get into than how you'll fareitachiuchiha wrote:That is like saying that if someone can't break 1300 on the SAT, they should not go to college. Here I am with a near 4.0. The LSAT is NOT a good indicator of how a person will do in school. Neither was the SAT or any standardized test.TripTrip wrote:It's not possible for everyone to get over a 170. But if it's not possible for someone to break 170, they shouldn't go to law school.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Bildungsroman
- Posts: 5529
- Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 2:42 pm
Re: Why do people on here just assume that anyone can get 170+
loooool. Cute. Enjoy law school.TripTrip wrote:But if it's not possible for someone to break 170, they shouldn't go to law school.
-
- Posts: 592
- Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 5:32 pm
Re: Why do people on here just assume that anyone can get 170+
lol what are you doing?itachiuchiha wrote:Here I am with a near 4.0.TripTrip wrote:It's not possible for everyone to get over a 170. But if it's not possible for someone to break 170, they shouldn't go to law school.
-
- Posts: 908
- Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2012 9:59 pm
Re: Why do people on here just assume that anyone can get 170+
The dude just said that " if it's not possible for someone to break 170, they shouldn't go to law school."JamMasterJ wrote:terrible analogy. it has more to do with the type of school you'll get into than how you'll fareitachiuchiha wrote:That is like saying that if someone can't break 1300 on the SAT, they should not go to college. Here I am with a near 4.0. The LSAT is NOT a good indicator of how a person will do in school. Neither was the SAT or any standardized test.TripTrip wrote:It's not possible for everyone to get over a 170. But if it's not possible for someone to break 170, they shouldn't go to law school.
DAMN, my highest was a 169, I guess Cooley is out of the question
- JamMasterJ
- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: Why do people on here just assume that anyone can get 170+
it is a general rule that a sub 170 won't likely net great options. Bils is obviously one exceptionitachiuchiha wrote:The dude just said that " if it's not possible for someone to break 170, they shouldn't go to law school."JamMasterJ wrote:terrible analogy. it has more to do with the type of school you'll get into than how you'll fareitachiuchiha wrote:That is like saying that if someone can't break 1300 on the SAT, they should not go to college. Here I am with a near 4.0. The LSAT is NOT a good indicator of how a person will do in school. Neither was the SAT or any standardized test.TripTrip wrote:It's not possible for everyone to get over a 170. But if it's not possible for someone to break 170, they shouldn't go to law school.
DAMN, my highest was a 169, I guess Cooley is out of the question
-
- Posts: 908
- Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2012 9:59 pm
Re: Why do people on here just assume that anyone can get 170+
dual major in legal studies and poli sciA → B ⊨ ¬B → ¬A wrote:lol what are you doing?itachiuchiha wrote:Here I am with a near 4.0.TripTrip wrote:It's not possible for everyone to get over a 170. But if it's not possible for someone to break 170, they shouldn't go to law school.
- dingbat
- Posts: 4974
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 9:12 pm
Re: Why do people on here just assume that anyone can get 170+
Yield Protectitachiuchiha wrote:The dude just said that " if it's not possible for someone to break 170, they shouldn't go to law school."JamMasterJ wrote:terrible analogy. it has more to do with the type of school you'll get into than how you'll fareitachiuchiha wrote:That is like saying that if someone can't break 1300 on the SAT, they should not go to college. Here I am with a near 4.0. The LSAT is NOT a good indicator of how a person will do in school. Neither was the SAT or any standardized test.TripTrip wrote:It's not possible for everyone to get over a 170. But if it's not possible for someone to break 170, they shouldn't go to law school.
DAMN, my highest was a 169, I guess Cooley is out of the question
- dowu
- Posts: 8298
- Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2012 9:47 pm
Re: Why do people on here just assume that anyone can get 170+
My lowest score is a 176. If you can't get a 180 then you are DUMB.
- nygrrrl
- Posts: 4434
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 1:01 am
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login