Page 1 of 3

LG-LR-RC-RC-LR

Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 3:49 pm
by Will_Imake_it
was third RC exp?

Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR

Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 3:50 pm
by bitsy
give us the topics, babycakes

Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR

Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 3:59 pm
by CyanIdes Of March
Can we post about the topics without getting in trouble with LSAC? There's some substantial links between me and this account so I have to be extra careful :| .

Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR

Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:01 pm
by bitsy
pretty sure that's alright, since weve splashed them all over the waiting thread.

Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR

Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:05 pm
by CyanIdes Of March
*Edited because I'm paranoid (but I have decent reason to be unfortunately).

Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR

Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:08 pm
by LionelHutzJD
Corridos was the real section. And I completely bombed it.

Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR

Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:08 pm
by bitsy
fourth was real, then.

i think the s4p3 was on enforcement of laws and a water bill tax solution

Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR

Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:09 pm
by carboncopyx
Cyanides, I think you're right. Except the comparative in Section 4 was about prosecutorial discretion/water bills. And I think that was the real one.

Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR

Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:11 pm
by trildog1091
Reading comp made me cry

Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR

Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:12 pm
by carboncopyx
trildog1091 wrote:Reading comp made me cry
Don't cryyyy. :( (And yes, I might be through with half a bottle of wine by now.)

Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR

Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:20 pm
by CyanIdes Of March
Wow. Someone just messaged me saying that the thread has been logged and that action may be taken? I sure hope it's someone trolling me (which would be the cruelest troll ever) but seriously...

Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR

Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:24 pm
by Will_Imake_it
i dont even remember the topics on the third RC, Because I was blank.. I hope the second RC was real.. isn't it suppose to be that the first three section always has the experimental?

Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR

Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:56 pm
by KingsBench
I got thrown off by having LG first, I'm pretty sure I bombed the section - got thrown off by the 3rd game. And I had this inkling that the first RC experimental - it seemed too easy. The second RC felt much harder overall.

Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR

Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:58 pm
by Scotchandsoda
The passage with Corrido was the real one.

Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR

Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:59 pm
by Will_Imake_it
KingsBench wrote:I got thrown off by having LG first, I'm pretty sure I bombed the section - got thrown off by the 3rd game. And I had this inkling that the first RC experimental - it seemed too easy. The second RC felt much harder overall.
game with articles was real as I have read so far.

Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR

Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 5:16 pm
by droppingby
please say the shaman/dualities one was the dummy, anyone please.

Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR

Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 5:36 pm
by happyshapy
droppingby wrote:please say the shaman/dualities one was the dummy, anyone please.
I don't remember that. The real one was mexican boarder lit/insects, plants/econ theory/waterbills

Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR

Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 5:45 pm
by 99.9luft
LionelHutzJD wrote:Corridos was the real section. And I completely bombed it.
fuck, seriously? but i loved Descartes so much....

Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR

Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 6:08 pm
by californiauser
The first LR killed me. I have no idea why. I felt like the games were the easiest complete section i've ever seen.

I had to guess on 4 LR questions when I usually finish with time, fuck.

Anyone else think LR1 was exceptionally hard or is it just me?

Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR

Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 6:12 pm
by Funkycrime
LR one was definitely harder than two, but still in the realm of average I would say. The 1st RC went so well, I was pretty pissed when I turned the page after the break to find another.

Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR

Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 6:44 pm
by happyshapy
Funkycrime wrote:LR one was definitely harder than two, but still in the realm of average I would say. The 1st RC went so well, I was pretty pissed when I turned the page after the break to find another.
same. I had a hard time finding my focus after that. The econ passage I found difficult because I really wasn't paying enough attention to understand it. Mex boarders and incests were pretty good, and the water bills was really easy, I just didn't enough time to answer with confidence.

I really have zero clue how I did. Anywhere from a 160 to 170.

Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR

Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 6:50 pm
by papercut
Hi all,

Do any of you guys (that had only real LRs) remember having a question about believing a report?

Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR

Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 6:51 pm
by californiauser
papercut wrote:Hi all,

Do any of you guys (that had only real LRs) remember having a question about believing a report?
Is that all you can remember about it? I'm fairly confident I can remember any question I had if you give me a little more to work with.

Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR

Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 6:55 pm
by Cellar-door
californiauser wrote:
papercut wrote:Hi all,

Do any of you guys (that had only real LRs) remember having a question about believing a report?
Is that all you can remember about it? I'm fairly confident I can remember any question I had if you give me a little more to work with.
I think they mean the Kids TV versus Museums question.

Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR

Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 6:56 pm
by californiauser
Cellar-door wrote:
californiauser wrote:
papercut wrote:Hi all,

Do any of you guys (that had only real LRs) remember having a question about believing a report?
Is that all you can remember about it? I'm fairly confident I can remember any question I had if you give me a little more to work with.
I think they mean the Kids TV versus Museums question.
Definitely had that one.