yesCellar-door wrote:I think they mean the Kids TV versus Museums question.californiauser wrote:Is that all you can remember about it? I'm fairly confident I can remember any question I had if you give me a little more to work with.papercut wrote:Hi all,
Do any of you guys (that had only real LRs) remember having a question about believing a report?
LG-LR-RC-RC-LR
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 1:46 am
Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR
- CyanIdes Of March
- Posts: 700
- Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2012 1:57 pm
Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR
I 'think' as long as you don't talk about the answers or what you picked you're fine... but after the fear of God was put into me I'd be cautious lol.papercut wrote:No nothing about museums.
I remember more but I was afraid to write more.
It's about whether or not someone should believe a report. there was an answer about playing the lottery an answer about weather forecasts and about being sick.
I remember more but I'm not sure how much is okay to recall.
-
- Posts: 375
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 4:33 pm
Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR
I had nothing about the lottery, forecasts etc. So likely that was the experimental one.papercut wrote:No nothing about museums.
I remember more but I was afraid to write more.
It's about whether or not someone should believe a report. there was an answer about playing the lottery an answer about weather forecasts and about being sick.
I remember more but I'm not sure how much is okay to recall.
- papercut
- Posts: 1446
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 6:48 pm
Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR
Thanks. I hope so.Cellar-door wrote:I had nothing about the lottery, forecasts etc. So likely that was the experimental one.papercut wrote:No nothing about museums.
I remember more but I was afraid to write more.
It's about whether or not someone should believe a report. there was an answer about playing the lottery an answer about weather forecasts and about being sick.
I remember more but I'm not sure how much is okay to recall.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- happyshapy
- Posts: 190
- Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2010 11:41 pm
Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR
- papercut
- Posts: 1446
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 6:48 pm
Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR
- naillsat
- Posts: 146
- Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2011 11:48 pm
Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR
I feel very confident with the two LR sections, and had 3-4 minutes to spare for each, this never happened for my PTs. LG was not hard until I hit the fourth game-----had focus issue. I had 10 minutes left when I finished the third game, but just could not focus on the game, so had to guess 3-2 of the questions after eliminating a few answer choices.
Overall, I think the test PT 68 feels easier than PT 67, but I'll see. The curve could be -9 or -10. It was not as difficult as the June test PT 66. LSAC throws me RC twice as extra sections. I definitely hate RC.
- Poo-T
- Posts: 266
- Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2012 10:32 am
Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR
wow, are you me?naillsat wrote:Just had LG-LR-RC-RC-LR as well. The first RC was super easy and I thought I could go -2 on that one, however, I felt so pissed when I saw another RC after the break. The second RC, however, read more like LSAT. I don't know how well or how bad I did on it. The second RC had the folk song (sorry cannot be more specific), water bills, etc.
I feel very confident with the two LR sections, and had 3-4 minutes to spare for each, this never happened for my PTs. LG was not hard until I hit the fourth game-----had focus issue. I had 10 minutes left when I finished the third game, but just could not focus on the game, so had to guess 3-2 of the questions after eliminating a few answer choices.
Overall, I think the test PT 68 feels easier than PT 67, but I'll see. The curve could be -9 or -10. It was not as difficult as the June test PT 66. LSAC throws me RC twice as extra sections. I definitely hate RC.
-
- Posts: 64
- Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2012 9:52 pm
Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR
- naillsat
- Posts: 146
- Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2011 11:48 pm
Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR
hi you! lolPoo-T wrote:wow, are you me?naillsat wrote:Just had LG-LR-RC-RC-LR as well. The first RC was super easy and I thought I could go -2 on that one, however, I felt so pissed when I saw another RC after the break. The second RC, however, read more like LSAT. I don't know how well or how bad I did on it. The second RC had the folk song (sorry cannot be more specific), water bills, etc.
I feel very confident with the two LR sections, and had 3-4 minutes to spare for each, this never happened for my PTs. LG was not hard until I hit the fourth game-----had focus issue. I had 10 minutes left when I finished the third game, but just could not focus on the game, so had to guess 3-2 of the questions after eliminating a few answer choices.
Overall, I think the test PT 68 feels easier than PT 67, but I'll see. The curve could be -9 or -10. It was not as difficult as the June test PT 66. LSAC throws me RC twice as extra sections. I definitely hate RC.
- naillsat
- Posts: 146
- Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2011 11:48 pm
Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR
second this wishful thinkingJUburton wrote:I'm hoping that those games were harder in general than people may think here because everyone is so well prepared and we get a - 12 and I sneak by with a 170.
-
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Mon May 07, 2012 10:12 pm
Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR
it was hard, in pts I always finish with 2-3 minutes to spare, on that one had to guess in the end on 2-3californiauser wrote:The first LR killed me. I have no idea why. I felt like the games were the easiest complete section i've ever seen.
I had to guess on 4 LR questions when I usually finish with time, fuck.
Anyone else think LR1 was exceptionally hard or is it just me?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Mon May 07, 2012 10:12 pm
Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR
PT 67 Games were way harder, but this time around the RC was killer.naillsat wrote:
Overall, I think the test PT 68 feels easier than PT 67, but I'll see. The curve could be -9 or -10. It was not as difficult as the June test PT 66. LSAC throws me RC twice as extra sections. I definitely hate RC.
-
- Posts: 64
- Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2012 9:52 pm
Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR
I thought PT67s games were easier. And that 67s RC was harder.
- nygrrrl
- Posts: 4434
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 1:01 am
Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR
Just so that everyone knows: this is very, very close to the line. VERY close.papercut wrote:No nothing about museums.
I remember more but I was afraid to write more.
It's about whether or not someone should believe a report. there was an answer about playing the lottery an answer about weather forecasts and about being sick.
I remember more but I'm not sure how much is okay to recall.
-
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 1:57 am
Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 9:19 pm
Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR
- VUSisterRayVU
- Posts: 162
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2012 2:57 pm
Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR
-
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 11:12 am
Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR
Glad to see everyone is more optimistic about this one than the horrible Oct. test. I LOVED LG on this test. I initially thought I had an exp. games because it was so easy. But I agree with others, I had to guess on the last 2 because of the 3rd game which is fine with me after having taken that October Logic Games section. (zones still brings me nightmares)
The 3rd section - RC (exp.) was perfect. I breezed through missing very few, if any. But of course it was experimental. After I came back from break and saw another RC section, I crashed. This 4th section was not too bad but it was just the fact that I thought I had RC covered for the test. Also, oddly enough I had NO A's for answers in this section, which was clearly wrong but oh well.
Args were cool. I had trouble staying focused during the 2nd arg section but still made it to the end. In all, this test was definitely a better performance, I feel, than my last LSAT.
-
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 10:57 pm
Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- red52
- Posts: 108
- Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 1:28 am
Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR
easy question.... dont quite remember what LR it was on though. probably real... but i had exp LR so who knowslampshade0520 wrote:anyone remember a crying and hormones question? please tell me that's real
- carboncopyx
- Posts: 565
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 10:30 am
Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR
If you're talking about LR, it was real.lampshade0520 wrote:anyone remember a crying and hormones question? please tell me that's real
-
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 10:57 pm
Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR
-
- Posts: 64
- Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2012 9:52 pm
Re: LG-LR-RC-RC-LR
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Senior Level Tax Attorney
USA-MD-RockvilleMaryland Boutique Tax firm seeks Senior Level Tax Attorney. Want to be part of a special team? Qualifi... read more
-
Associate Attorney
USA-VA-DullesSalary $70,000 - $75,000 a year Job Type Full-time Qualifications Experience: lega... read more
-
Summer Internship
USA-VA-SterlingSummer Internship The intern may be asked to do a variety of things, including day-to-day office work such as... read more